Re: [新聞] 謝依涵殺人 媽媽嘴老闆判共賠368萬消失
這就是一個社會風險分擔的概念
立法者預設原告都是孤苦無依
被告兩手攤一攤說沒錢
這時候被告的老闆最有錢
就找老闆要，老闆再找被告要
或者由保險公司分擔
如此一來，弱勢的原告可以填補損害，雇主的損失也可以藉由保險賠償
算是把風險平均分攤予社會
適用本條的前提是有客觀僱傭關係且執行職務中
最常舉的例子是公司司機送貨撞到人
至於本案，要是謝依涵在上班的時候就開始下藥，不就該當執行職務時所為的侵權行為
如果法沒有一致性，以後頂X司機載著垃圾油撞到人，充充只要說我都選F1車手來當司機
，所以盡選任監督義務，然後被害人家屬就準備燒炭囉
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 27.242.70.180
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/Gossiping/M.1497590664.A.229.html
→
06/16 13:26, , 1F
06/16 13:26, 1F
→
06/16 13:26, , 2F
06/16 13:26, 2F
推
06/16 13:26, , 3F
06/16 13:26, 3F
推
06/16 13:27, , 4F
06/16 13:27, 4F
推
06/16 13:28, , 5F
06/16 13:28, 5F
噓
06/16 13:29, , 6F
06/16 13:29, 6F
→
06/16 13:30, , 7F
06/16 13:30, 7F
→
06/16 13:30, , 8F
06/16 13:30, 8F
→
06/16 13:31, , 9F
06/16 13:31, 9F
噓
06/16 13:31, , 10F
06/16 13:31, 10F
→
06/16 13:31, , 11F
06/16 13:31, 11F
→
06/16 13:32, , 12F
06/16 13:32, 12F
→
06/16 13:32, , 13F
06/16 13:32, 13F
→
06/16 13:32, , 14F
06/16 13:32, 14F
→
06/16 13:33, , 15F
06/16 13:33, 15F
→
06/16 13:36, , 16F
06/16 13:36, 16F
推
06/16 13:37, , 17F
06/16 13:37, 17F
推
06/16 13:38, , 18F
06/16 13:38, 18F
噓
06/16 13:39, , 19F
06/16 13:39, 19F
→
06/16 13:39, , 20F
06/16 13:39, 20F
推
06/16 13:39, , 21F
06/16 13:39, 21F
→
06/16 13:39, , 22F
06/16 13:39, 22F
→
06/16 13:39, , 23F
06/16 13:39, 23F
→
06/16 13:40, , 24F
06/16 13:40, 24F
推
06/16 13:41, , 25F
06/16 13:41, 25F
→
06/16 13:41, , 26F
06/16 13:41, 26F
→
06/16 13:42, , 27F
06/16 13:42, 27F
→
06/16 13:42, , 28F
06/16 13:42, 28F
→
06/16 13:43, , 29F
06/16 13:43, 29F
噓
06/16 13:49, , 30F
06/16 13:49, 30F
噓
06/16 14:15, , 31F
06/16 14:15, 31F
噓
06/16 15:44, , 32F
06/16 15:44, 32F
→
06/16 16:01, , 33F
06/16 16:01, 33F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文 (最舊先)：
完整討論串 (本文為第 7 之 22 篇)：