作者查詢 / oodh

總覽項目: 發文 | 留言 | 暱稱
作者 oodh 在 PTT [ politics ] 看板的留言(推文), 共3296則
限定看板:politics
看板排序:
全部Policy8596politics3296Tokusatsu1397GreenParty837Ecophilia755tutor717Education651DPP461Urban_Plan426media-chaos372KMT338SMSlife207IA135MRT126gay123poem107Economics101NTUDalawasao93Facebook74Inference70Geography61RealPlaying52W-Philosophy50Old-Games43StupidClown38CrossStrait37Management35HatePolitics28PoliticLaw25PublicAffair25joke24JinYong23museum20TA_AN18puzzle17CultureShock16Road16RootsnShoots16LegalTheory15Volunteer15Christianity13pts13TW-language13Architecture10BBSmovie10Feminism10juniorhigh10Agriculture8Detective8PushDoll8Hualien7Teacher7Koei6L_Block6medache6CH7th3105drawing5emprisenovel5FJU-ACCR945IC-Card5India5NCCU_SEED5SuperHeroes5a-diane4Buzz_Service4Catholic4Doctor-Info4EarthScience4NEW_ROC4TigerBlue4Aboriginal3B96305XXX3CTSH91-3023Gintama3I-Lan3ID_Multi3KS94-3073l9763NTPUyouthCOM3NTUmed913SOUNDFILM3TTU-I90B3ADS2ascii_wanted2Bon_Jovi2ck_17_3012CSMU-AC922FJU_JCS112HCU2HK-movie2Horror2HSNU_11462Hunter2KS94-3202KS96-3052KS97-3082L_HappyLivin2LAW2Little-Games2medstudent2NCCU00_DIP2NCHU-AGR022NCUECON962NDHU-His1012NEHS19th42NH11th3053092ntnuch95c2NTUE-LAW2NTUEE_LAB2062NTUPP-872NUK_AC1002NUMB3RS2Paradox2PH-sea2PoliticBM2PublicBM2scu_transfer2SMHS91_3062soho2Steam2VET_942Vocal2Wikipedia2Azumanga1Bioindustry1Biology1BLEACH1CCSH_88_3041CCUfinGrad931China1CHITEE4UD90A1CHSH-93-3041CHSH-94-3191CJCU1ck53rd3051ck54th3301ck57th3201ck57th3291ck58th3071ck58th3171CKCMGuitar141cksh83rd1161cksh83rd3101cksh84th3021CMU_M481CoolGroove1CPU_CP7311CSMU-D951CSMU-MED901CSMU-MED941CSMU-MED951CSMU-NT_BALL1CSMU-OP941CSMU-OT941CYCU_CE92B1CYCU_EE_07A1CYCU_MIS_93A1CYCUEL95A1D_Fin_Law_921D_Fin_Law_971Daan26th3161DYU1FarRadio1FCU-PF20061FHSH-89-3161FJU-ACC90a1FJU-ACCR931FJU_CPSY1FJU_OT2nd1FJUecobasket1FLAT_CLUB1FSHS-95-3011Geotecheng961GirlE_MiliW1Hamster1HisShark1HSNU_11151HSNU_11351HSNU_11421ILSH-973091ILSH-973131ISUEE93A1killercorp1KS87-3021KS91-3021KS91-3191KS93-3201KS94-3211KS96-3031KS96-3121KS98-3021LHU1LTSH-963111MIRAGE_LAB1MrFullswing1NanMen-Talk1NCCU05_MBA1NCCU05_PF1NCCU06_HISTO1NCCU_ICE1NCCU_SignLan1NCCUEcoSport1NCHU-FS1001NCHU-giip1NCU95IE1NCUFingrad031NCUSYBBI971NDHU-His981NDHU-MBA951NDHU-phy931NDHU_OECLab1NDMC-M1031NDMC-PH231NHFC1NTHU-MSE091NTNUgeoR961NTNUHumanism1NTPU-COECO921NTPU-LAND90B1NTPU-SOCM961NTPU-STAT951NTU-OMIH991NTUBIME-1021NTUCL-BASKET1NTUdent951NTUdent961NTUE-CS-BKB1NTUEE_POWER1NTUEE_VAL1NTUHorti961NTUST-TX-B921NTUTO1NUK_AC981NUU_IM1OLD_STAR1Orzhong97cl1Ourmovies1pal1PC26th3181PCCU-CS1PeopleSeries1PT-931Queer_drama1Railway1RSSH90_1061RSSH92_3041RSSH93_3021S.H.E1Simcity1SSSH-13th3111StarWars1STDM-97-303B1SWORD1TamShui1TFSHS62th3051TFSHS65th3201TFSHS66th3191THU_BA20001THUAS_931TKU-ChemSB1TKU-GITS941TKU-IE941TKU-Strategy1TKU_CE94C1TKU_EW94B1TKU_trans1Toy1TYSH48-3011TYSH50-3031Unique_Mika1USC1VibWang1WuLing46-3171YiGo3111YMU_bioMed961Yunlin1Yup98-091YZU_MBA941<< 收起看板(278)
Re: [請益] 韓非子五蠹論ECFA
[ politics ]34 留言, 推噓總分: +5
作者: bluebugi - 發表於 2011/07/18 08:46(13年前)
2Foodh:和鑑之前,台積電就流出了一個「中芯」現在還114.136.122.248 07/18 09:45
3Foodh:是中國最大的晶圓廠咧…… 個案都有個案的特114.136.122.248 07/18 09:45
4Foodh:色,藉古也未必適合諷今; 這陣子政治板很多114.136.122.248 07/18 09:46
5Foodh:文章,都是先設定了馬政府做的好或不好,展開114.136.122.248 07/18 09:46
6Foodh:的演繹,卻都不著墨在為什麼馬政府做的好或不114.136.122.248 07/18 09:47
7Foodh:好,那爭論這個也就無法倒因為果回頭推論馬政114.136.122.248 07/18 09:48
8Foodh:府及其政策的適合存續與否;翻古文出來,先忽114.136.122.248 07/18 09:48
9Foodh:略古文的時空和部份文意,再忽略現今台灣的時114.136.122.248 07/18 09:49
11Foodh:空和部份歷史經驗,要把二者湊在一起也就不難114.136.122.248 07/18 09:49
12Foodh:只是拼貼勞作而已114.136.122.248 07/18 09:50
14Foodh:http://0rz.tw/OxEZs 你說不行就不行?114.136.122.248 07/18 09:52
15Foodh:人家不但是中國龍頭,這兩天還把台籍幹部換了114.136.122.248 07/18 09:52
17Foodh:這才是中國取得台灣技術的最好例子114.136.122.248 07/18 09:52
27Foodh:斷章取義,人家是說中科的人事要穩定下來114.136.122.248 07/19 00:20
28Foodh:跟「中科不行了」差十萬八千里, dpp立委說再114.136.122.248 07/19 00:21
29Foodh:炒下去dpp會分裂,可以得證「dpp分裂了」嗎?114.136.122.248 07/19 00:21
30Foodh:自爽...114.136.122.248 07/19 00:21
31Foodh:無庸置疑中芯現在就是龍頭,而只也不是一路114.136.122.248 07/19 00:22
32Foodh:衰敗,只是剛死了個領導階層114.136.122.248 07/19 00:22
提供不分區名單
[ politics ]12 留言, 推噓總分: +5
作者: JohnMash - 發表於 2011/07/17 20:43(13年前)
7Foodh:理想家不等於暴衝者,曾巨威在稅改開始沒多久114.136.122.248 07/17 23:43
8Foodh:就暴衝離席,簡的主張也過於激進 ,近些人都114.136.122.248 07/17 23:43
10Foodh:沒能力實踐理想,只能靠衝撞來累積社會關注114.136.122.248 07/17 23:44
11Foodh:嚴長壽對蘇花和澎湖也是除了反建設沒什麼幫助114.136.122.248 07/17 23:45
如何救高鐵?
[ politics ]14 留言, 推噓總分: +9
作者: JohnMash - 發表於 2011/07/15 11:58(13年前)
2Foodh:..............114.136.122.248 07/15 12:04
Re: [閒聊] 健忘的自由時報
[ politics ]43 留言, 推噓總分: +3
作者: Ecclestone - 發表於 2011/07/09 18:23(13年前)
5Foodh:雖然是六七年前,不過我有次在台南聽到一個老111.80.193.248 07/09 19:25
6Foodh:闆娘和朋友聊天 說他不舍服去藥房拿藥吃111.80.193.248 07/09 19:25
7Foodh:朋友問 為什麼不去大醫院檢查,他說「那些醫111.80.193.248 07/09 19:26
8Foodh:院都國民黨開的,哪可以去」 我才知道有些思111.80.193.248 07/09 19:26
9Foodh:維邏輯是真實存在的。111.80.193.248 07/09 19:27
10Foodh:其實也不用多南部,我爸去理髮時就和老闆聊說111.80.193.248 07/09 19:28
14Foodh:健保漲價就是要拿老百姓的錢去蓋捷運,台北捷111.80.193.248 07/09 19:29
15Foodh:運馬英九不知道污了多少 -- 好迂迴的邏輯,我111.80.193.248 07/09 19:30
19Foodh:爸很少出門,除了房間電視鎖定民視三立外111.80.193.248 07/09 19:30
21Foodh:我也猜不到他是從來聽到材料想得出這些的……111.80.193.248 07/09 19:30
Re: [閒聊] 蔡英文:『當選後 推動農業基本法』
[ politics ]26 留言, 推噓總分: +3
作者: kevinjl - 發表於 2011/07/06 00:36(13年前)
24Foodh:台灣稻米自給率高達九十,是需求減少才減產的42.73.62.243 07/06 10:35
Re: [閒聊] 蔡英文:『當選後 推動農業基本法』
[ politics ]34 留言, 推噓總分: +8
作者: oodh - 發表於 2011/07/05 22:15(13年前)
21Foodh:我質疑的很簡單,你休率地不拿來種糧食就不可42.73.62.243 07/06 10:33
22Foodh:能拉高糧食自給率,什麼理由也一樣,這道理42.73.62.243 07/06 10:34
23Foodh:就跟不多生 生育率就不會高一樣簡單42.73.62.243 07/06 10:34
24Foodh:當然,坑一些人,把分母變小這我是沒考慮啦42.73.62.243 07/06 10:36
[建議] 尊重及多元的政治
[ politics ]29 留言, 推噓總分: +8
作者: kuca - 發表於 2011/07/04 15:57(13年前)
14Foodh:正所謂情場如戰場114.136.106.97 07/04 19:54
Re: 關於shouri大:"台積電非核電不能用!" 此一謬述 …
[ politics ]577 留言, 推噓總分: +41
作者: STEM - 發表於 2011/07/04 03:01(13年前)
420Foodh:b大沒仔細看,文中 中國用電池的那個連結提到42.72.120.136 07/04 09:53
421Foodh:「這將是第一個mw級電池儲電站」 人家要蓋的42.72.120.136 07/04 09:54
422Foodh:是一個可以儲入以mw為單位電能的電池,42.72.120.136 07/04 09:54
423Foodh:你還在說「哪來這麼大的電池」就是有啊42.72.120.136 07/04 09:55
424Foodh:綠能不能當基載電力,它的作用通常就是在42.72.120.136 07/04 09:55
425Foodh:透過儲電才能達到「削峰調谷」42.72.120.136 07/04 09:57
Re: [閒聊] 我對教育的主張
[ politics ]15 留言, 推噓總分: +3
作者: stevegreat08 - 發表於 2011/07/04 01:05(13年前)
3Foodh:今天電視在說隋棠小時候也留學波蘭吶42.72.120.136 07/04 01:44
4Foodh:她還說自己在那學到很多42.72.120.136 07/04 01:44
Re: 關於shouri大:"台積電非核電不能用!" 此一謬述 …
[ politics ]351 留言, 推噓總分: +57
作者: MoneyMonkey - 發表於 2011/07/03 21:36(13年前)
1Foodh:有哪個擁核人士支持不要圍阻體(不用戴安全帽)42.72.120.136 07/03 21:40
2Foodh:錢放銀行很安全不會被偷? 很安全的話為什麼42.72.120.136 07/03 21:41
3Foodh:要有厚厚的庫房 為什麼要有保全要有鋼板、鎖42.72.120.136 07/03 21:42
4Foodh:同學,就是有這這些才安全的42.72.120.136 07/03 21:42
5Foodh:你這篇文章的邏輯根本有問題42.72.120.136 07/03 21:42