作者查詢 / yauhh
作者 yauhh 在 PTT [ logic ] 看板的留言(推文), 共386則
限定看板:logic
看板排序:
全部Soft_Job2172Master_D1344Tokusatsu1142JingXingBoys948C_and_CPP649Programming615logic386Lomo364Coffee298Visual_Basic231Cloud197PeopleSeries128Emergency124AndroidDev121Prob_Solve119Little-Games117photo102gallantry87CSSE78PLT78ComeHere77C_Sharp72book56CTV46Python44ShiauLiang42poem39Gossiping35L_TalkandCha35CodeJob28Ajax26L_LifeJob24magic_silver23Inference22Guolun20FJU-STAT95B19NCYU_BE_96b19NDHU-phy10119NIU-ECE94b19Isayama17LaTeX17soho15KingofPop12RealPlaying12TKU_EW94B12Linux10NTU-IPH9610NUK_AC9810share10Translate-CS10AfterPhD9NCKU-BEH959Christianity8FLAT_CLUB8NCCUflamenco8NCHU_CsHsnu8SYSOP8Viator98Bing8W-Philosophy8NUU-EE-97A7sky7SSSH-16th-Fk7GameDesign6JinYong6media-chaos6Ptt-Charity6TaiwanDrama6ai-photo5GossipPicket5HCHS933145KS93-3165XiangSheng5CYCU_Chem92b4CYCU_ICE90AB4Emulator4HSNU_11464Interdiscip4JP_Entertain4Militarylife4NCCU05_GIDS4NCCU_PFBASE4NCHU-Wind4NDHU-Ch994Notebook4NTPU-CSIE954NTUEE_Speech4NTUST-EE-B934PhD4PttLaw4Starbucks4Windows4Boy-Girl3Buddhism3FinalFantasy3Gamesale3Google3HarryPotter3Hate3HCSHch13_3113Keelung3KUAS_CSIE3NCCU3NCTU_CS_EDA3NDSH_6th3143NSwitch3NSYSU-Chem993OOAD3paranormal3PhotoCritic3Salary3Sijhih3SSSH-16th3093STREET_BALL3Tech_Job3TigerBlue3Violation3army_53-2T2B97A013XX2comm_and_RF2CS95WISDOM2Dragonica2Ecophilia2Education2EmailYang2FJU_JCS112Folklore2HHSH2HK-movie2java2Jeans2KOTDFansClub2KS98-3022MCU_Talk2Men5432MUSTMIS2NARUTO2NCHU-AGR052NCHU-MEgradu2NCHU-Mount2NCHU_MBA972NCNUEM2NDHU-phy1022NewAge2NKUTEE2NSYSU_EE95-12ntnuch95c2NTOU-EBFS932NTPU-CSIE982NTUEE_LAB2062NTUST-TX-B962Patent2Peter_EN2PHP2PttHistory2PublicServan2PushDoll2SayLove2SuperBike2Tainan2THU_BA20002transgender2Yup-mwgc2Yup03-042About_Life1AD_NCCU_VB1Ancient1Android1Anti-ramp1ASHS-93-li1AU_Talk1Aviation1B98A013XX1Badminton1Beauty1BigSanchung1bookhouse1Browsers1Bus1Butterfly1C_ChatBM1CareerLady1ChangHua1Cheer1Childhood1CHSH-96-3101Civil1ck46th3311ck47th3201ck55th3071ck55th3201ck57th3211ck58th3241cksh82nd3211clmusic1Comic1consumer1CPSHS10th3031Cross_Life1CrossGate1CSI1CSMU-D991customers1dance1DIABLO1digger1DJ_fightman1DummyHistory1Editor1Employee1EuropeTravel1Facebook1facelift1Fiction1FishShrimp1FJU-Family1Fooyin1GuildWars1GUNNM1HanDian1HRM1HSNU_10351HSNU_10651HSNU_10951HSNU_11421Hualien1ILSH-973091Instant_Mess1japanavgirls1jhs_30_51JOJO1joke1kawaii1KERORO1KingdomHuang1KNU1KS90-3111KS92-3161KS93-3171KS94-3121KS95-3211KS96-3151KS97-3101KS97-3131KS97-3181KS97-3201KS_PMAC1Lifeismoney1Lineage1LTK1M_Manson1marvel1meditation1MIT1Modchip1MRT1Nantou1NatureSeeker1Navy1NBAEasyChat1NCCU-YP1NCCU06_JAPAN1NCCU08_LawB1NCCU_PubLaw1NCCU_SEED1NCHU-FS981NCHU-MKT991NCKU_CSIE931NCKU_MEPhC1NCTU_HARCLUB1NCU97ME-B1NDHU1NDHU_ACC_5TH1NKNU_Phy0981NPUST1NSYSU_MSOE991NTHU_EDA2231NTHU_HIS971NTHU_IEEM-941NTHUTL981NTNU-HISBK1NTNUMasSport1NTPU-COECO951NTPU-CSIE961NTPU-STAT951NTU1NTUGIEE_RFIC1NTUMBA-981NTUphy971NTUST_Talk1NTUT_ME495A1NYUST00_FING1Old-Games1PCCU_Talk1peianyang1PingTung1Printer_scan1PttLifeLaw1RO1Rock_OE1RPGMaker1RumikoTWorld1SailorMoon1ScienceNote1SCU_Law101D1Seiya1ShowOff1SHU-JourM981Shu-Lin1ShuangHe1SongShan1SOS1Spain1SSSH-09th1141StoneAge1SuperHeroes1Supermission1Supernatural1SWORD1TA_AN1Taipei1tajen1TamShui1Taoism1TFSHS61st3211TFSHS67th3211TFSHS68th3211Tin-Ha1TNFSH98th1translator1TTU-AFL1TTU-talk1TY_Research1TypeMoon1Volleyball1WarHammer1Wego5-yi1WorkanTravel1WorkinChina1YUGIOH1YZU_EE96B1YZU_MLSB1YZUfinGrad961ZQ-Physics1<< 收起看板(343)
1F推:我想差別是,丐題是邏輯謬誤; 但不曉得有沒有人說套套邏輯是07/07 03:15
2F→:毫無謬誤的?07/07 03:15
6F→:不是,tautology的定義是恆真句當然大家都知道,但許多丐題07/07 12:10
7F→:也可以忽視謬誤而直接說它是恆真句啊! 但在tautology這邊,07/07 12:11
8F→:我沒看過所謂先必須是無謬誤的,再是必須是恆真的定義,07/07 12:12
9F→:起碼Wikipedia沒看到相關的談論. 而恆真和謬誤並不是互斥..07/07 12:13
1F→:全台灣......06/28 07:41
3F→:不,現在這樣也算是有些科學家是聰明的06/17 21:14
6F→:樓上,你要知道邏輯學中所說的論述是怎麼一回事...07/01 14:16
7F→:第三條是結論,第二條是小前提,於是不會有由二,三知的這回事.07/01 14:17
1F推:「要」釐清烏鴉是黑的這件事嗎? 命題不就說"烏鴉->黑"了04/22 09:32
2F→:另外,是命題提出來,由現有的事物列舉來指其真偽啊,就像你所04/22 09:33
3F→:說的,一樣一樣檢查是否都說明命題為真04/22 09:33
4F→:另外,我覺得如果你想把事情談清楚,最好不要像這樣一行一行04/22 09:34
5F→:切割的辯論. 或許你以為每一段都要駁到對,但是在每個對之間04/22 09:34
6F→:很容易顯露出前後文不一,而不證自明自己言之無理04/22 09:35
7F推:因為短短言論中,我不知道你的世界觀實情,而你也不知道我的04/22 09:37
8F→:世界觀實情,而若你要用你所認真的細節來駁回我認知的細節,04/22 09:38
9F→:是不公平的. 此外你拋出問題不就是要意見? 卻要把意見全打回04/22 09:38
10F→:那就別談好了.04/22 09:38
68F推:喔對啊第三題,記得蠟筆小新卡通的娃娃車是左開門的04/14 13:26
6F推:回樓上,邏輯是講形式,套套邏輯是一種型式,要附加褒貶則是看01/18 12:03
7F→:使用的場合. 基本上,一般人會因白痴二字感到被羞辱,但是不會01/18 12:04
8F→:因為套套邏輯四字感到被羞辱,甚至"對啊,本來就是套套邏輯."01/18 12:06
1F推:考慮實例反而麻煩,容易讓人分心11/11 09:45
3F推:不,這樣的說法明明是特殊化了11/11 18:37
5F推:一般化應是指抽象;你用舉實例方式討論是特殊化11/12 22:57
6F→:用集合外延的確可以一般化,但是,你並沒有做到,就不該說11/12 22:58
7F推:哦,更正我的說辭,外延一詞就是指特殊化;如本篇的例子,你只11/13 10:49
8F→:定義滿足p的case都滿足q,然而在原式p->q中,滿足p的case11/13 10:50
9F→:不一定要滿足q --- 這才是一般化.11/13 10:50
10F→:至於簡潔嘛,你的例子除了要想什麼是->之外,還要想<或>=這些11/13 10:52
11F→:關係,對新手的負擔太重. 我認為以實例主導容易導致分心.11/13 10:53
1F推:Thank you for the insightful description.11/10 22:54
1F推:哦,那麼有趣的是如何用一套邏輯證明本身是錯了11/02 23:23
15F推:上帝無限快的訊息只是一種超然描述,說明甲可以觀察乙鐘,乙也10/27 07:31
22F推:我覺得元波為了批判,前置的描述不客觀10/27 17:08