Re: [轉錄][新聞]真的這麼準?自由時報應公布民調方法
※ 引述《einstean (台北捷運世界一流)》之銘言:
: 標題: Re: [轉錄][新聞]真的這麼準?自由時報應公布民調方法
: 時間: Wed Dec 13 21:15:15 2006
:
: ※ 引述《doggyinside (語言障礙)》之銘言:
: : 這篇文章=中時民調組的推託之詞
:
: 奇怪?沒人看懂他想表達什麼嗎?他是在質疑自由的民調造假啊!
: 真是神奇了,怎麼沒有人懷疑自由民調的真實性?
: 說的更明白一點,我怎麼知道那些數據是不是自由隨便亂掰的?
:
: 不過自由的臉皮還真是厚,上次台北縣長的民調那麼不準,好像
: 也沒有聽到他們出來解釋一下,現在民調(真的有做民調嗎?)
: 變準了就開始大肆宣傳......
:
: 推 einstean:原來「批評自由」=「替中時護航」XD 12/14 20:37
: → einstean:還是說在這個板只能批評中時,但是不能批評自由?XD 12/14 20:38
批自由的文章很多,請自己多翻前文,不要懶成這樣XD
會噓你是因為你批評的很沒道理XD..
因為自由這次的民調是最準的,你批評頂多是針對羅文嘉選舉哪一次,
但是這一次,你沒評沒劇就說自由的數據亂掰,只能顯示你心胸很狹隘,
見不得別人準XD
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 140.116.91.49
推
12/14 21:38, , 1F
12/14 21:38, 1F
→
12/14 21:38, , 2F
12/14 21:38, 2F
→
12/14 21:39, , 3F
12/14 21:39, 3F
→
12/14 21:40, , 4F
12/14 21:40, 4F
→
12/14 21:41, , 5F
12/14 21:41, 5F
推
12/14 21:41, , 6F
12/14 21:41, 6F
→
12/14 21:42, , 7F
12/14 21:42, 7F
→
12/14 22:56, , 8F
12/14 22:56, 8F
→
12/14 23:00, , 9F
12/14 23:00, 9F
→
12/14 23:20, , 10F
12/14 23:20, 10F
→
12/14 23:21, , 11F
12/14 23:21, 11F
→
12/14 23:50, , 12F
12/14 23:50, 12F
→
12/15 00:21, , 13F
12/15 00:21, 13F
→
12/15 00:24, , 14F
12/15 00:24, 14F
→
12/15 00:24, , 15F
12/15 00:24, 15F
推
12/15 00:26, , 16F
12/15 00:26, 16F
→
12/15 00:27, , 17F
12/15 00:27, 17F
→
12/15 00:27, , 18F
12/15 00:27, 18F
→
12/15 00:28, , 19F
12/15 00:28, 19F
→
12/15 00:29, , 20F
12/15 00:29, 20F
推
12/15 00:31, , 21F
12/15 00:31, 21F
推
12/15 00:33, , 22F
12/15 00:33, 22F
→
12/15 00:34, , 23F
12/15 00:34, 23F
→
12/15 00:35, , 24F
12/15 00:35, 24F
→
12/15 00:36, , 25F
12/15 00:36, 25F
→
12/15 00:37, , 26F
12/15 00:37, 26F
→
12/15 00:37, , 27F
12/15 00:37, 27F
推
12/15 00:38, , 28F
12/15 00:38, 28F
→
12/15 00:38, , 29F
12/15 00:38, 29F
推
12/15 00:40, , 30F
12/15 00:40, 30F
推
12/15 00:56, , 31F
12/15 00:56, 31F
→
12/15 10:58, , 32F
12/15 10:58, 32F
→
12/15 13:13, , 33F
12/15 13:13, 33F
→
12/15 13:16, , 34F
12/15 13:16, 34F
推
12/15 13:57, , 35F
12/15 13:57, 35F
推
12/16 03:05, , 36F
12/16 03:05, 36F
討論串 (同標題文章)