[討論]現在的攻防規則真的對進攻者很有利嗎?
最近幾年有不少老球星出來說,現在的規則對進攻方很有利
如果是用現在的規則來對付巔峰的喬神, 喬神可以單場得100分
如果是當年72勝的公牛隊,套用現在的比賽規則,可以拿到78勝
如果是巴爵士時代的太陽隊,可以打敗現在14連勝的無敵勇士
雖然零容忍之後,有些球星有出現摸毛犯規
但是難道90年代球星當年比賽時,套用現在的攻防規則,
就可以大幅提高他們的命中率跟平均得分嗎?
像柯瑞這種常得超過30分 平均命中率又破50%的人,就算用90年代的比賽規則,
命中率跟得分應該也差不了多少吧?
請問現在的攻防規則真的對進攻者很有利嗎?
謝謝
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 114.25.31.111
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/NBA/M.1448097908.A.FBC.html
※ 編輯: godiegroup (114.25.31.111), 11/21/2015 17:25:44
→
11/21 17:26, , 1F
11/21 17:26, 1F
推
11/21 17:26, , 2F
11/21 17:26, 2F
推
11/21 17:30, , 3F
11/21 17:30, 3F
推
11/21 17:32, , 4F
11/21 17:32, 4F
推
11/21 17:33, , 5F
11/21 17:33, 5F
→
11/21 17:33, , 6F
11/21 17:33, 6F
→
11/21 17:33, , 7F
11/21 17:33, 7F
推
11/21 17:36, , 8F
11/21 17:36, 8F
→
11/21 17:37, , 9F
11/21 17:37, 9F
推
11/21 17:38, , 10F
11/21 17:38, 10F
推
11/21 17:48, , 11F
11/21 17:48, 11F
推
11/21 17:49, , 12F
11/21 17:49, 12F
推
11/21 17:50, , 13F
11/21 17:50, 13F
→
11/21 17:50, , 14F
11/21 17:50, 14F
→
11/21 17:50, , 15F
11/21 17:50, 15F
→
11/21 17:51, , 16F
11/21 17:51, 16F
推
11/21 17:54, , 17F
11/21 17:54, 17F
推
11/21 17:57, , 18F
11/21 17:57, 18F
推
11/21 18:01, , 19F
11/21 18:01, 19F
推
11/21 18:05, , 20F
11/21 18:05, 20F
→
11/21 18:06, , 21F
11/21 18:06, 21F
推
11/21 18:06, , 22F
11/21 18:06, 22F
→
11/21 18:07, , 23F
11/21 18:07, 23F
→
11/21 18:08, , 24F
11/21 18:08, 24F
→
11/21 18:09, , 25F
11/21 18:09, 25F
→
11/21 18:09, , 26F
11/21 18:09, 26F
→
11/21 18:09, , 27F
11/21 18:09, 27F
→
11/21 18:10, , 28F
11/21 18:10, 28F
推
11/21 18:13, , 29F
11/21 18:13, 29F
→
11/21 18:16, , 30F
11/21 18:16, 30F
推
11/21 18:18, , 31F
11/21 18:18, 31F
→
11/21 18:19, , 32F
11/21 18:19, 32F
→
11/21 18:22, , 33F
11/21 18:22, 33F
推
11/21 18:53, , 34F
11/21 18:53, 34F
→
11/21 18:54, , 35F
11/21 18:54, 35F
→
11/21 18:54, , 36F
11/21 18:54, 36F
→
11/21 18:55, , 37F
11/21 18:55, 37F
→
11/21 18:56, , 38F
11/21 18:56, 38F
→
11/21 18:57, , 39F
11/21 18:57, 39F
還有 41 則推文
→
11/21 20:38, , 81F
11/21 20:38, 81F
→
11/21 20:38, , 82F
11/21 20:38, 82F
→
11/21 20:39, , 83F
11/21 20:39, 83F
→
11/21 20:40, , 84F
11/21 20:40, 84F
→
11/21 20:40, , 85F
11/21 20:40, 85F
→
11/21 20:41, , 86F
11/21 20:41, 86F
推
11/21 20:59, , 87F
11/21 20:59, 87F
推
11/21 20:59, , 88F
11/21 20:59, 88F
噓
11/21 21:03, , 89F
11/21 21:03, 89F
推
11/21 21:05, , 90F
11/21 21:05, 90F
→
11/21 21:05, , 91F
11/21 21:05, 91F
→
11/21 21:05, , 92F
11/21 21:05, 92F
推
11/21 21:29, , 93F
11/21 21:29, 93F
→
11/21 21:31, , 94F
11/21 21:31, 94F
→
11/21 21:40, , 95F
11/21 21:40, 95F
→
11/21 21:40, , 96F
11/21 21:40, 96F
推
11/21 21:40, , 97F
11/21 21:40, 97F
→
11/21 21:41, , 98F
11/21 21:41, 98F
→
11/21 21:42, , 99F
11/21 21:42, 99F
推
11/21 21:46, , 100F
11/21 21:46, 100F
→
11/21 21:46, , 101F
11/21 21:46, 101F
噓
11/21 21:55, , 102F
11/21 21:55, 102F
噓
11/21 22:40, , 103F
11/21 22:40, 103F
→
11/21 22:40, , 104F
11/21 22:40, 104F
→
11/21 22:49, , 105F
11/21 22:49, 105F
→
11/21 22:49, , 106F
11/21 22:49, 106F
→
11/21 22:49, , 107F
11/21 22:49, 107F
→
11/21 22:49, , 108F
11/21 22:49, 108F
→
11/21 22:49, , 109F
11/21 22:49, 109F
→
11/21 22:49, , 110F
11/21 22:49, 110F
→
11/21 22:49, , 111F
11/21 22:49, 111F
→
11/21 22:49, , 112F
11/21 22:49, 112F
→
11/21 23:48, , 113F
11/21 23:48, 113F
推
11/22 00:57, , 114F
11/22 00:57, 114F
→
11/22 00:59, , 115F
11/22 00:59, 115F
→
11/22 00:59, , 116F
11/22 00:59, 116F
→
11/22 01:10, , 117F
11/22 01:10, 117F
→
11/22 01:10, , 118F
11/22 01:10, 118F
→
11/22 01:10, , 119F
11/22 01:10, 119F
推
11/22 23:32, , 120F
11/22 23:32, 120F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文:
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 9 篇):