Re: [爆卦] 勞動部轉彎了消失
休息日加班需取得勞工同意,那勞工只同意加一小,剩下三小不同意還要請假嗎?
一小既然已有加班事實,就是應該給加班費四小啊。還要請假要不要扣全勤扣考績啊?
DPP真的很容易給人看破手腳耶,既然是表姐的意思,我看英大總統的意思也八九不離十
了。
黨工說有第五點可以避免雇主濫用勞工請假的理由規避加班費,我就呵呵了。勞基法幾年
了?勞檢幾年了?有查完嗎?這解釋只是更方便老闆省加班費鑽漏洞而已。原本一例一休不
就是希望以價制量減少加班?現在這解釋一出,有效果嗎?
看來看去,只有砍七天假是真的。
吱吱是不是不懂請假要老闆同意啊?既然同意員工請假,那原本真的有必要加到4小嗎?真
的又急又重要老闆是緊急找另一個能加4小的員工還是找那個做1小的員工剩下3小老闆跳
下去做?不急不重要,那員工幹嘛去加班?
實務上最常出現的狀況吱吱都在裝傻。老闆:"你來公司找一下檔案,我忘記放哪裡了。剩
下三小時記得拿假單給我簽。"勞檢?等抓到再說囉。
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 27.147.6.77
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/Gossiping/M.1489680047.A.F1F.html
噓
03/17 00:01, , 1F
03/17 00:01, 1F
推
03/17 00:03, , 2F
03/17 00:03, 2F
推
03/17 00:03, , 3F
03/17 00:03, 3F
推
03/17 00:04, , 4F
03/17 00:04, 4F
※ 編輯: gina31126 (27.147.6.77), 03/17/2017 00:08:49
→
03/17 00:05, , 5F
03/17 00:05, 5F
推
03/17 00:05, , 6F
03/17 00:05, 6F
→
03/17 00:05, , 7F
03/17 00:05, 7F
→
03/17 00:06, , 8F
03/17 00:06, 8F
→
03/17 00:06, , 9F
03/17 00:06, 9F
推
03/17 00:07, , 10F
03/17 00:07, 10F
→
03/17 00:07, , 11F
03/17 00:07, 11F
噓
03/17 00:08, , 12F
03/17 00:08, 12F
→
03/17 00:08, , 13F
03/17 00:08, 13F
哪裡有照算?請病價的加班費被扣掉了啊?
推
03/17 00:08, , 14F
03/17 00:08, 14F
推
03/17 00:08, , 15F
03/17 00:08, 15F
噓
03/17 00:10, , 16F
03/17 00:10, 16F
推
03/17 00:10, , 17F
03/17 00:10, 17F
→
03/17 00:11, , 18F
03/17 00:11, 18F
→
03/17 00:11, , 19F
03/17 00:11, 19F
→
03/17 00:11, , 20F
03/17 00:11, 20F
推
03/17 00:12, , 21F
03/17 00:12, 21F
推
03/17 00:13, , 22F
03/17 00:13, 22F
推
03/17 00:14, , 23F
03/17 00:14, 23F
推
03/17 00:14, , 24F
03/17 00:14, 24F
→
03/17 00:15, , 25F
03/17 00:15, 25F
噓
03/17 00:15, , 26F
03/17 00:15, 26F
※ 編輯: gina31126 (27.147.6.77), 03/17/2017 00:17:35
噓
03/17 00:16, , 27F
03/17 00:16, 27F
噓
03/17 00:16, , 28F
03/17 00:16, 28F
推
03/17 00:17, , 29F
03/17 00:17, 29F
噓
03/17 00:17, , 30F
03/17 00:17, 30F
噓
03/17 00:18, , 31F
03/17 00:18, 31F
你看一下公文第四點好不好?3小時在哪裡?
推
03/17 00:18, , 32F
03/17 00:18, 32F
→
03/17 00:18, , 33F
03/17 00:18, 33F
→
03/17 00:19, , 34F
03/17 00:19, 34F
噓
03/17 00:20, , 35F
03/17 00:20, 35F
※ 編輯: gina31126 (27.147.6.77), 03/17/2017 00:21:54
→
03/17 00:21, , 36F
03/17 00:21, 36F
→
03/17 00:21, , 37F
03/17 00:21, 37F
→
03/17 00:22, , 38F
03/17 00:22, 38F
推
03/17 00:25, , 39F
03/17 00:25, 39F
推
03/17 00:27, , 40F
03/17 00:27, 40F
推
03/17 00:28, , 41F
03/17 00:28, 41F
※ 編輯: gina31126 (27.147.6.77), 03/17/2017 00:44:19
推
03/17 00:38, , 42F
03/17 00:38, 42F
噓
03/17 00:39, , 43F
03/17 00:39, 43F
→
03/17 00:40, , 44F
03/17 00:40, 44F
→
03/17 00:44, , 45F
03/17 00:44, 45F
→
03/17 00:44, , 46F
03/17 00:44, 46F
推
03/17 00:45, , 47F
03/17 00:45, 47F
批評的就是這個函釋,原本勞動部公告的就是因休息日出勤未獲得充分休息,所以4小時
內按4小時算。現在這函釋就是打臉,只來一小時,通勤成本和被破壞的假期成本依然在
依然打擾休息日的完整性。本來就應該有最低起跳價,多了請假機制就是走後門沒錯。
※ 編輯: gina31126 (27.147.6.77), 03/17/2017 00:52:20
噓
03/17 00:50, , 48F
03/17 00:50, 48F
推
03/17 00:54, , 49F
03/17 00:54, 49F
推
03/17 01:06, , 50F
03/17 01:06, 50F
→
03/17 01:07, , 51F
03/17 01:07, 51F
→
03/17 01:08, , 52F
03/17 01:08, 52F
推
03/17 01:09, , 53F
03/17 01:09, 53F
推
03/17 01:09, , 54F
03/17 01:09, 54F
→
03/17 01:21, , 55F
03/17 01:21, 55F
→
03/17 01:21, , 56F
03/17 01:21, 56F
→
03/17 01:21, , 57F
03/17 01:21, 57F
就扣掉的部分按休假標準辦理啊,請事假不就扣2小時全薪?原法規就是規定來一小給四小
。
※ 編輯: gina31126 (27.147.6.77), 03/17/2017 01:37:47
→
03/17 01:45, , 58F
03/17 01:45, 58F
→
03/17 01:45, , 59F
03/17 01:45, 59F
→
03/17 01:45, , 60F
03/17 01:45, 60F
→
03/17 01:45, , 61F
03/17 01:45, 61F
→
03/17 01:45, , 62F
03/17 01:45, 62F
噓
03/17 08:06, , 63F
03/17 08:06, 63F
噓
03/17 08:06, , 64F
03/17 08:06, 64F
推
03/17 08:45, , 65F
03/17 08:45, 65F
推
03/17 10:52, , 66F
03/17 10:52, 66F
→
03/17 10:53, , 67F
03/17 10:53, 67F
→
03/17 14:00, , 68F
03/17 14:00, 68F
推
03/17 14:08, , 69F
03/17 14:08, 69F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文:
爆卦
4
24
完整討論串 (本文為第 16 之 65 篇):
爆卦
-1
15
爆卦
4
11
爆卦
6
45
爆卦
-3
28
爆卦
3
10
爆卦
-1
23
爆卦
54
199
爆卦
6
13
爆卦
2
64