Re: [問題] 民進黨真的廢
推
05/15 16:35,
05/15 16:35
→
05/15 16:35,
05/15 16:35
→
05/15 16:36,
05/15 16:36
→
05/15 16:51,
05/15 16:51
→
05/15 16:54,
05/15 16:54
→
05/15 16:54,
05/15 16:54
→
05/15 16:54,
05/15 16:54
要談尊嚴可以,實力先拿出來,無論如何,只有有實力才會受到尊重。民進黨
執政最讓人失望的地方,正式他們根本沒有辦法增加台灣任何方面的實力,只能
藉由不斷的到處灑錢來遮掩、美化自己的無能。
台灣人注重經濟並非是不要尊嚴,而是經濟是台灣最大的後盾,國際間台灣最
容易加入的組織,不是什麼軍事同盟、不是什麼政治同盟,而是經濟組織,這是
因為台灣的經濟實力不容忽視,才能獲得的相對待遇。當經濟砸鍋的那一刻,台
灣什麼也不必談了。
你有聽過一個人被欺負時,跟對方說「我受到憲法保障,擁有不可剝奪的天賦
人權」這種廢話有用嗎?民進黨搞公投要向國際「發聲」,搞得就是這一套;然
後除了高唱中國即將崩潰的論調外,對兩岸的經濟局勢沒有任何作為,這才是他
們被人民唾棄的最主要理由。
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 122.118.230.76
推
05/15 19:41, , 1F
05/15 19:41, 1F
→
05/15 19:42, , 2F
05/15 19:42, 2F
推
05/15 19:48, , 3F
05/15 19:48, 3F
推
05/15 19:49, , 4F
05/15 19:49, 4F
→
05/15 19:49, , 5F
05/15 19:49, 5F
推
05/15 19:51, , 6F
05/15 19:51, 6F
→
05/15 19:52, , 7F
05/15 19:52, 7F
推
05/15 20:42, , 8F
05/15 20:42, 8F
→
05/15 20:44, , 9F
05/15 20:44, 9F
→
05/15 20:45, , 10F
05/15 20:45, 10F
推
05/15 21:38, , 11F
05/15 21:38, 11F
推
05/16 01:31, , 12F
05/16 01:31, 12F
→
05/16 01:31, , 13F
05/16 01:31, 13F
→
05/16 01:32, , 14F
05/16 01:32, 14F
推
05/16 01:40, , 15F
05/16 01:40, 15F
→
05/16 01:41, , 16F
05/16 01:41, 16F
→
05/16 01:41, , 17F
05/16 01:41, 17F
→
05/16 01:42, , 18F
05/16 01:42, 18F
→
05/16 23:25, , 19F
05/16 23:25, 19F
推
05/16 23:33, , 20F
05/16 23:33, 20F
推
05/16 23:35, , 21F
05/16 23:35, 21F
推
05/16 23:36, , 22F
05/16 23:36, 22F
推
05/16 23:37, , 23F
05/16 23:37, 23F
推
05/16 23:38, , 24F
05/16 23:38, 24F
→
05/16 23:38, , 25F
05/16 23:38, 25F
→
05/16 23:39, , 26F
05/16 23:39, 26F
→
05/16 23:39, , 27F
05/16 23:39, 27F
→
05/16 23:40, , 28F
05/16 23:40, 28F
→
05/16 23:41, , 29F
05/16 23:41, 29F
→
05/16 23:41, , 30F
05/16 23:41, 30F
→
05/16 23:42, , 31F
05/16 23:42, 31F
還有 33 則推文
→
05/16 23:54, , 65F
05/16 23:54, 65F
→
05/16 23:54, , 66F
05/16 23:54, 66F
→
05/16 23:54, , 67F
05/16 23:54, 67F
→
05/16 23:54, , 68F
05/16 23:54, 68F
→
05/16 23:54, , 69F
05/16 23:54, 69F
→
05/16 23:55, , 70F
05/16 23:55, 70F
推
05/17 00:02, , 71F
05/17 00:02, 71F
推
05/17 00:04, , 72F
05/17 00:04, 72F
推
05/17 00:04, , 73F
05/17 00:04, 73F
→
05/17 00:05, , 74F
05/17 00:05, 74F
→
05/17 00:05, , 75F
05/17 00:05, 75F
→
05/17 00:06, , 76F
05/17 00:06, 76F
→
05/17 00:07, , 77F
05/17 00:07, 77F
推
05/17 00:16, , 78F
05/17 00:16, 78F
→
05/17 00:17, , 79F
05/17 00:17, 79F
推
05/17 00:18, , 80F
05/17 00:18, 80F
→
05/17 00:18, , 81F
05/17 00:18, 81F
→
05/17 00:19, , 82F
05/17 00:19, 82F
→
05/17 00:19, , 83F
05/17 00:19, 83F
→
05/17 00:19, , 84F
05/17 00:19, 84F
→
05/17 00:20, , 85F
05/17 00:20, 85F
→
05/17 00:20, , 86F
05/17 00:20, 86F
推
05/17 00:21, , 87F
05/17 00:21, 87F
→
05/17 00:22, , 88F
05/17 00:22, 88F
推
05/17 00:22, , 89F
05/17 00:22, 89F
推
05/17 00:23, , 90F
05/17 00:23, 90F
→
05/17 00:23, , 91F
05/17 00:23, 91F
→
05/17 00:24, , 92F
05/17 00:24, 92F
→
05/17 00:26, , 93F
05/17 00:26, 93F
→
05/17 00:26, , 94F
05/17 00:26, 94F
推
05/17 00:29, , 95F
05/17 00:29, 95F
→
05/17 00:30, , 96F
05/17 00:30, 96F
推
05/17 13:48, , 97F
05/17 13:48, 97F
→
05/17 13:49, , 98F
05/17 13:49, 98F
→
05/17 13:51, , 99F
05/17 13:51, 99F
→
05/17 13:52, , 100F
05/17 13:52, 100F
→
05/17 13:52, , 101F
05/17 13:52, 101F
→
05/17 13:53, , 102F
05/17 13:53, 102F
推
05/17 13:56, , 103F
05/17 13:56, 103F
推
05/19 12:20, , 104F
05/19 12:20, 104F
討論串 (同標題文章)
本文引述了以下文章的的內容:
問題
7
74
以下文章回應了本文:
問題
12
27
完整討論串 (本文為第 15 之 20 篇):
問題
8
12
問題
13
34
問題
11
16
問題
12
27
問題
26
104
問題
8
24
問題
5
12
問題
7
74