Re: [討論] 有些錯誤邏輯推論 台灣主權
看板PublicIssue作者n3oanderson (wake up ...)時間9年前 (2015/04/16 22:43)推噓4(4推 0噓 7→)留言11則, 4人參與討論串5/14 (看更多)
i.imgur.com/s6owP4v.png
http://history.state.gov/historicaldocuments/frus1955-57v23p1/d89
時間: 1956年
(美國)國務卿(Dulles)提醒 Shigemitsu 千島群島和琉球群島在投降條約(surrender
terms)裡是以相同的方式處理, 而且美國同意依條約日本對琉球仍有剩餘主權, 依
第26條條款如果日本給與蘇聯更好的條件我們可以依約要求同樣的條件. 那表示如果
日本承認蘇聯對千島群島有完整的主權(full sovereignty)我們認為我們同樣擁有對
琉球群島的完整主權(full sovereignty).
The Secretary reminded Mr. Shigemitsu that the Kuriles and Ryukyus were
handled in the same manner under the surrender terms and that while the
United States had by the peace treaty agreed that residual sovereignty to
the Ryukyus might remain with Japan, we had also stipulated by Article 26
that if Japan gave better terms to Russia we could demand the same terms
for ourselves. That would mean that if Japan recognized that the Soviet
Union was entitled to full sovereignty over the Kuriles we would assume
that we were equally entitled to full sovereignty over the Ryukyus.
http://digicoll.library.wisc.edu/cgi-bin/FRUS/FRUS-idx?type=turn&id=
FRUS.FRUS195254v14p2&entity=FRUS.FRUS195254v14p2.p0266&isize=text&q1=
residual
依據和平條約第二款, 日本放棄對韓國, 福爾摩沙, 千島群島, 庫頁島 ... 的
權利. 那可以被推論日本對那些同意託管的群島擁有最終的主權是被承認的.這
個想法是被 Dulles 和英國代表 Younger (勉強)承認(conceded). Dulles 提到
目前日本的形勢(position)如同"剩餘主權".
In Article 2 of the Peace Treaty, Japan renounced right, title
and claim to Korea, Formosa, the Kuriles, Sakhalin, the Mandated
Islands, Antarctic area, the Spratly Islands and the Paracel Is-
lands. It may be inferred that ultimate Japanese sovereignty was
recognized over the islands she agreed to place in trusteeship. This
conception was conceded by Mr. Dulles (page 78, Dept. State Publi-
cation 4392) 8 and by Mr. Younger, the U.K. delegate (page 93,
Dept. State Publication 4392). Mr. Dulles speaks of the current Jap-
anese position as "residual sovereignty".
http://law.justia.com/cases/federal/district-courts/FSupp/123/145/1509376/
面對同盟國不同的意見, 美國覺得最好的處置方法(formula)是允許日本擁有剩餘主
權...
In the face of this division of Allied opinion, the United States felt that
the best formula would be to permit Japan to retain residual sovereignty...
日本, 而不是美國, 有 Okinawa 的 de jure soverengity 由於條約(SFPT)的承認,
...
Japan, and not the United States, having "de jure sovereignty" over Okinawa
since the ratification of the Treaty of Peace, ...
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 111.243.119.25
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/PublicIssue/M.1429195380.A.085.html
※ 編輯: n3oanderson (111.243.119.25), 04/16/2015 22:44:34
推
04/16 22:44, , 1F
04/16 22:44, 1F
→
04/16 22:44, , 2F
04/16 22:44, 2F
※ 編輯: n3oanderson (111.243.119.25), 04/16/2015 22:45:02
→
04/16 22:45, , 3F
04/16 22:45, 3F
→
04/16 22:46, , 4F
04/16 22:46, 4F
→
04/16 22:47, , 5F
04/16 22:47, 5F
→
04/16 22:47, , 6F
04/16 22:47, 6F
推
04/16 22:49, , 7F
04/16 22:49, 7F
※ 編輯: n3oanderson (111.243.119.25), 04/16/2015 23:11:41
推
04/16 23:12, , 8F
04/16 23:12, 8F
→
04/16 23:14, , 9F
04/16 23:14, 9F
※ 編輯: n3oanderson (111.243.119.25), 04/16/2015 23:32:08
※ 編輯: n3oanderson (111.243.119.25), 04/16/2015 23:54:42
※ 編輯: n3oanderson (111.243.119.25), 04/16/2015 23:56:52
※ 編輯: n3oanderson (111.243.119.25), 04/16/2015 23:58:16
推
04/17 12:32, , 10F
04/17 12:32, 10F
→
04/17 12:33, , 11F
04/17 12:33, 11F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文：
完整討論串 (本文為第 5 之 14 篇)：