[新聞] 一卡通上北捷引起議論 管碧玲:議員搞錯
自由時報電子報
http://news.ltn.com.tw/news/politics/breakingnews/1436079
2015-09-06 16:53
〔記者王榮祥/高雄報導〕立委管碧玲今在臉書指出,針對一卡通上北捷、開記者會批北
市府的議員都搞錯了﹗
管碧玲指出,其實北捷優惠八折和公車轉乘,本來就是鼓勵乘客用卡不用票,優惠對象不
限台北市民。一卡通持卡人也不只高雄市民。
如果台北市民沒悠遊卡只有一卡通,現行制度下同樣不優惠(亦即不補助),所以這件事
和城市無關、和卡有關,因為根本就是優惠「人」、而不是補貼「卡的公司」,開記者會
的議員都搞錯了!
過去北捷封鎖其他所有票證,只准悠遊卡進出,等於逼迫其他票證持有人,必須多買一張
悠遊卡,等於是替悠遊卡促銷,不是保護台北市民權益,因為沒卡、台北市民一樣免談,
有卡、任何縣市的人都補助!
管碧玲肯定台北市交通局長腦筋清楚,說出最關鍵的概念!
圖片
http://news.ltn.com.tw/photo/politics/breakingnews/1436079_1
立委管碧玲今在臉書指出,針對一卡通上北捷、開記者會批北市府的議員都搞錯了﹗(資
料照,記者梁珮綺攝)
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 182.234.73.168
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/MRT/M.1441532374.A.A96.html
※ charlesgreen:轉錄至看板 IC-Card 09/06 17:39
→
09/06 17:42, , 1F
09/06 17:42, 1F
推
09/06 17:42, , 2F
09/06 17:42, 2F
→
09/06 17:44, , 3F
09/06 17:44, 3F
推
09/06 17:46, , 4F
09/06 17:46, 4F
推
09/06 18:04, , 5F
09/06 18:04, 5F
→
09/06 18:09, , 6F
09/06 18:09, 6F
→
09/06 18:09, , 7F
09/06 18:09, 7F
推
09/06 18:09, , 8F
09/06 18:09, 8F
→
09/06 18:09, , 9F
09/06 18:09, 9F
推
09/06 18:10, , 10F
09/06 18:10, 10F
推
09/06 18:10, , 11F
09/06 18:10, 11F
→
09/06 18:10, , 12F
09/06 18:10, 12F
推
09/06 18:13, , 13F
09/06 18:13, 13F
→
09/06 18:14, , 14F
09/06 18:14, 14F
推
09/06 18:14, , 15F
09/06 18:14, 15F
推
09/06 18:17, , 16F
09/06 18:17, 16F
→
09/06 18:17, , 17F
09/06 18:17, 17F
→
09/06 18:18, , 18F
09/06 18:18, 18F
有沒有優惠
之前我發的新聞有提到
可以往前爬文這一篇
#1Lt2-zzM (MRT)
(截錄內容)
至於悠遊卡去高雄捷運刷卡有沒有優惠的問題,柯文哲轉述交通部意思,目前高雄的一卡
通沒有補助折扣,所以持悠遊卡到高雄刷票也沒辦法享有8折優惠。(是8折還是85折?)
不過實際上有無悠遊卡優惠.等明年開通前就知道了
搭高雄公車(一卡通第三次起免費.悠遊卡第三次之後繼續以原價計費)
搭高雄渡輪(一卡通有優惠.悠遊卡以原價計費)
所以.悠遊卡搭高雄捷運會不會有優惠.我猜可能很難吧....@@
推
09/06 18:34, , 19F
09/06 18:34, 19F
→
09/06 18:34, , 20F
09/06 18:34, 20F
→
09/06 18:34, , 21F
09/06 18:34, 21F
北捷抵制悠遊卡?
※ 編輯: charlesgreen (182.234.73.168), 09/06/2015 18:36:28
→
09/06 18:37, , 22F
09/06 18:37, 22F
→
09/06 18:39, , 23F
09/06 18:39, 23F
→
09/06 18:42, , 24F
09/06 18:42, 24F
推
09/06 18:55, , 25F
09/06 18:55, 25F
→
09/06 18:56, , 26F
09/06 18:56, 26F
→
09/06 18:57, , 27F
09/06 18:57, 27F
→
09/06 18:58, , 28F
09/06 18:58, 28F
推
09/06 19:02, , 29F
09/06 19:02, 29F
推
09/06 19:05, , 30F
09/06 19:05, 30F
噓
09/06 19:05, , 31F
09/06 19:05, 31F
→
09/06 19:06, , 32F
09/06 19:06, 32F
→
09/06 19:07, , 33F
09/06 19:07, 33F
→
09/06 19:08, , 34F
09/06 19:08, 34F
→
09/06 19:08, , 35F
09/06 19:08, 35F
→
09/06 19:09, , 36F
09/06 19:09, 36F
推
09/06 19:09, , 37F
09/06 19:09, 37F
→
09/06 19:11, , 38F
09/06 19:11, 38F
→
09/06 19:12, , 39F
09/06 19:12, 39F
推
09/06 19:12, , 40F
09/06 19:12, 40F
→
09/06 19:12, , 41F
09/06 19:12, 41F
→
09/06 19:13, , 42F
09/06 19:13, 42F
→
09/06 19:32, , 43F
09/06 19:32, 43F
→
09/06 19:32, , 44F
09/06 19:32, 44F
→
09/06 19:35, , 45F
09/06 19:35, 45F
→
09/06 19:35, , 46F
09/06 19:35, 46F
推
09/06 20:04, , 47F
09/06 20:04, 47F
→
09/06 21:28, , 48F
09/06 21:28, 48F
推
09/06 21:42, , 49F
09/06 21:42, 49F
→
09/06 21:44, , 50F
09/06 21:44, 50F
推
09/06 21:49, , 51F
09/06 21:49, 51F
推
09/06 21:52, , 52F
09/06 21:52, 52F
→
09/06 21:52, , 53F
09/06 21:52, 53F
推
09/07 01:30, , 54F
09/07 01:30, 54F
推
09/07 01:52, , 55F
09/07 01:52, 55F
推
09/07 02:11, , 56F
09/07 02:11, 56F
推
09/08 13:49, , 57F
09/08 13:49, 57F
討論串 (同標題文章)
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 3 篇):