Re: [討論] 這筆交易對道奇其實沒那麼糟吧
忍不住回個文
交易本來就是需要個一兩年才能看出結果
目前紅襪就是要薪資空間
道奇看來就是要衝擊冠軍
在這邊為了爭這交易道奇輸紅襪贏爭的面紅耳赤
有必要嗎?
你管他吃了256M薪水,把四個人丟去給紅襪
只要這兩三年,道奇靠著他們拿到總冠軍,就是道奇贏了
在那邊分析什C.C打擊三圍一定要來個3/4/5
北極要來個200IP ERA3以下
道奇才會賺,有必要嗎?
就算北極場場完封,尻佛場場安打,拿不到冠軍有屁用?
這個交易蠢只單純蠢在科科提這個XX花最多的錢去賭而已
你可以罵科科提蠢,事實上我也是覺得他真的超蠢
不過只要道奇這兩三年拿下總冠軍,就是科科提贏了
只是贏的方式很白癡而已
看到一些人為了莫名的數據、薪資之類的爭的面紅耳赤
就覺得在爭這個要未來才能下定論的結果很...只能說大家時間蠻多的
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 36.229.86.70
→
08/26 23:06, , 1F
08/26 23:06, 1F
推
08/26 23:06, , 2F
08/26 23:06, 2F
推
08/26 23:07, , 3F
08/26 23:07, 3F
推
08/26 23:08, , 4F
08/26 23:08, 4F
→
08/26 23:08, , 5F
08/26 23:08, 5F
→
08/26 23:09, , 6F
08/26 23:09, 6F
推
08/26 23:09, , 7F
08/26 23:09, 7F
→
08/26 23:09, , 8F
08/26 23:09, 8F
推
08/26 23:10, , 9F
08/26 23:10, 9F
推
08/26 23:11, , 10F
08/26 23:11, 10F
→
08/26 23:12, , 11F
08/26 23:12, 11F
→
08/26 23:13, , 12F
08/26 23:13, 12F
→
08/26 23:13, , 13F
08/26 23:13, 13F
推
08/26 23:13, , 14F
08/26 23:13, 14F
推
08/26 23:16, , 15F
08/26 23:16, 15F
→
08/26 23:16, , 16F
08/26 23:16, 16F
→
08/26 23:16, , 17F
08/26 23:16, 17F
推
08/26 23:17, , 18F
08/26 23:17, 18F
推
08/26 23:18, , 19F
08/26 23:18, 19F
→
08/26 23:18, , 20F
08/26 23:18, 20F
推
08/26 23:19, , 21F
08/26 23:19, 21F
→
08/26 23:19, , 22F
08/26 23:19, 22F
→
08/26 23:19, , 23F
08/26 23:19, 23F
→
08/26 23:20, , 24F
08/26 23:20, 24F
→
08/26 23:20, , 25F
08/26 23:20, 25F
→
08/26 23:20, , 26F
08/26 23:20, 26F
→
08/26 23:20, , 27F
08/26 23:20, 27F
→
08/26 23:21, , 28F
08/26 23:21, 28F
推
08/26 23:22, , 29F
08/26 23:22, 29F
推
08/26 23:23, , 30F
08/26 23:23, 30F
→
08/26 23:23, , 31F
08/26 23:23, 31F
→
08/26 23:23, , 32F
08/26 23:23, 32F
→
08/26 23:24, , 33F
08/26 23:24, 33F
→
08/26 23:24, , 34F
08/26 23:24, 34F
→
08/26 23:24, , 35F
08/26 23:24, 35F
→
08/26 23:25, , 36F
08/26 23:25, 36F
推
08/26 23:25, , 37F
08/26 23:25, 37F
→
08/26 23:25, , 38F
08/26 23:25, 38F
→
08/26 23:26, , 39F
08/26 23:26, 39F
→
08/26 23:26, , 40F
08/26 23:26, 40F
→
08/26 23:27, , 41F
08/26 23:27, 41F
→
08/26 23:27, , 42F
08/26 23:27, 42F
→
08/26 23:27, , 43F
08/26 23:27, 43F
→
08/26 23:27, , 44F
08/26 23:27, 44F
→
08/26 23:27, , 45F
08/26 23:27, 45F
→
08/26 23:28, , 46F
08/26 23:28, 46F
→
08/26 23:28, , 47F
08/26 23:28, 47F
→
08/26 23:29, , 48F
08/26 23:29, 48F
→
08/26 23:29, , 49F
08/26 23:29, 49F
→
08/26 23:29, , 50F
08/26 23:29, 50F
→
08/26 23:30, , 51F
08/26 23:30, 51F
→
08/26 23:31, , 52F
08/26 23:31, 52F
→
08/26 23:31, , 53F
08/26 23:31, 53F
→
08/26 23:38, , 54F
08/26 23:38, 54F
推
08/26 23:39, , 55F
08/26 23:39, 55F
推
08/26 23:41, , 56F
08/26 23:41, 56F
推
08/26 23:50, , 57F
08/26 23:50, 57F
時間哪有樓上這位大大多y只會躲在推文拿不出好論點出來
推
08/26 23:53, , 58F
08/26 23:53, 58F
→
08/27 00:04, , 59F
08/27 00:04, 59F
推
08/27 00:04, , 60F
08/27 00:04, 60F
→
08/27 00:05, , 61F
08/27 00:05, 61F
→
08/27 00:06, , 62F
08/27 00:06, 62F
→
08/27 00:08, , 63F
08/27 00:08, 63F
推
08/27 00:11, , 64F
08/27 00:11, 64F
推
08/27 00:17, , 65F
08/27 00:17, 65F
推
08/27 00:47, , 66F
08/27 00:47, 66F
推
08/27 01:27, , 67F
08/27 01:27, 67F
推
08/27 01:30, , 68F
08/27 01:30, 68F
→
08/27 01:37, , 69F
08/27 01:37, 69F
→
08/27 01:38, , 70F
08/27 01:38, 70F
推
08/27 04:17, , 71F
08/27 04:17, 71F
推
08/27 12:13, , 72F
08/27 12:13, 72F
推
08/27 12:37, , 73F
08/27 12:37, 73F
→
08/27 12:37, , 74F
08/27 12:37, 74F
→
08/27 12:42, , 75F
08/27 12:42, 75F
→
08/27 12:43, , 76F
08/27 12:43, 76F
→
08/27 12:44, , 77F
08/27 12:44, 77F
→
08/27 12:44, , 78F
08/27 12:44, 78F
→
08/27 14:06, , 79F
08/27 14:06, 79F
→
08/27 14:08, , 80F
08/27 14:08, 80F
推
08/27 14:12, , 81F
08/27 14:12, 81F
推
08/27 15:41, , 82F
08/27 15:41, 82F
推
08/27 16:12, , 83F
08/27 16:12, 83F
→
08/27 19:06, , 84F
08/27 19:06, 84F
→
08/27 19:06, , 85F
08/27 19:06, 85F
→
08/27 19:07, , 86F
08/27 19:07, 86F
→
08/27 19:07, , 87F
08/27 19:07, 87F
→
08/27 19:08, , 88F
08/27 19:08, 88F
→
08/27 19:08, , 89F
08/27 19:08, 89F
→
08/27 23:28, , 90F
08/27 23:28, 90F
推
08/28 00:14, , 91F
08/28 00:14, 91F
※ 編輯: gyarados 來自: 36.229.86.101 (08/28 17:12)
討論串 (同標題文章)
完整討論串 (本文為第 6 之 13 篇):
討論
72
228