[問卦] 美國當初真的有必要丟兩顆原子彈嗎消失
二戰末期
日本根本已是強弩之末 太平洋戰爭失利後
科技被超越 航母被打爆 東亞領土幾乎被同盟國佔領
還被照三餐空襲 根本過沒多久 日本就會自己投降了吧
後世的教科書都說美國打敗日本德國大壞蛋
兩顆原子彈拯救了萬千同胞於苦海
但原子彈真的有必要嗎
有八卦否
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 49.159.236.20
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/Gossiping/M.1494659769.A.3F0.html
→
05/13 15:16, , 1F
05/13 15:16, 1F
推
05/13 15:16, , 2F
05/13 15:16, 2F
推
05/13 15:16, , 3F
05/13 15:16, 3F
推
05/13 15:16, , 4F
05/13 15:16, 4F
噓
05/13 15:16, , 5F
05/13 15:16, 5F
推
05/13 15:17, , 6F
05/13 15:17, 6F
噓
05/13 15:17, , 7F
05/13 15:17, 7F
推
05/13 15:17, , 8F
05/13 15:17, 8F
每年都在哭邀叫日德為二戰道歉 結果米國幹出這種事 卻不用道歉
呵呵 果然勝者為王
噓
05/13 15:17, , 9F
05/13 15:17, 9F
→
05/13 15:17, , 10F
05/13 15:17, 10F
→
05/13 15:17, , 11F
05/13 15:17, 11F
推
05/13 15:17, , 12F
05/13 15:17, 12F
推
05/13 15:18, , 13F
05/13 15:18, 13F
→
05/13 15:18, , 14F
05/13 15:18, 14F
→
05/13 15:18, , 15F
05/13 15:18, 15F
噓
05/13 15:18, , 16F
05/13 15:18, 16F
→
05/13 15:19, , 17F
05/13 15:19, 17F
推
05/13 15:19, , 18F
05/13 15:19, 18F
推
05/13 15:19, , 19F
05/13 15:19, 19F
推
05/13 15:19, , 20F
05/13 15:19, 20F
第一 你是丟在城市 大多是手無寸鐵的平民百姓
第二 輻射太大 影響數十年 有必要?
你去空襲日本軍營 還比較合理吧
→
05/13 15:19, , 21F
05/13 15:19, 21F
推
05/13 15:20, , 22F
05/13 15:20, 22F
→
05/13 15:20, , 23F
05/13 15:20, 23F
→
05/13 15:20, , 24F
05/13 15:20, 24F
推
05/13 15:20, , 25F
05/13 15:20, 25F
日本就沒死人?
→
05/13 15:20, , 26F
05/13 15:20, 26F
→
05/13 15:20, , 27F
05/13 15:20, 27F
→
05/13 15:20, , 28F
05/13 15:20, 28F
也是啦 神風特攻根本低能戰術
推
05/13 15:21, , 29F
05/13 15:21, 29F
→
05/13 15:21, , 30F
05/13 15:21, 30F
推
05/13 15:21, , 31F
05/13 15:21, 31F
→
05/13 15:21, , 32F
05/13 15:21, 32F
→
05/13 15:22, , 33F
05/13 15:22, 33F
真的QQ 自己抵死不從 孫女哈洋屌
推
05/13 15:23, , 34F
05/13 15:23, 34F
還有 202 則推文
還有 5 段內文
推
05/13 18:54, , 237F
05/13 18:54, 237F
推
05/13 18:55, , 238F
05/13 18:55, 238F
推
05/13 19:09, , 239F
05/13 19:09, 239F
噓
05/13 19:10, , 240F
05/13 19:10, 240F
推
05/13 19:19, , 241F
05/13 19:19, 241F
推
05/13 19:24, , 242F
05/13 19:24, 242F
→
05/13 19:24, , 243F
05/13 19:24, 243F
噓
05/13 19:31, , 244F
05/13 19:31, 244F
噓
05/13 19:42, , 245F
05/13 19:42, 245F
→
05/13 19:43, , 246F
05/13 19:43, 246F
噓
05/13 20:01, , 247F
05/13 20:01, 247F
→
05/13 20:01, , 248F
05/13 20:01, 248F
推
05/13 20:16, , 249F
05/13 20:16, 249F
噓
05/13 20:25, , 250F
05/13 20:25, 250F
噓
05/13 20:26, , 251F
05/13 20:26, 251F
推
05/13 20:28, , 252F
05/13 20:28, 252F
推
05/13 21:27, , 253F
05/13 21:27, 253F
推
05/13 21:48, , 254F
05/13 21:48, 254F
→
05/13 21:48, , 255F
05/13 21:48, 255F
噓
05/13 22:04, , 256F
05/13 22:04, 256F
推
05/13 22:14, , 257F
05/13 22:14, 257F
推
05/13 22:48, , 258F
05/13 22:48, 258F
推
05/13 22:51, , 259F
05/13 22:51, 259F
推
05/13 23:21, , 260F
05/13 23:21, 260F
→
05/13 23:22, , 261F
05/13 23:22, 261F
噓
05/14 02:26, , 262F
05/14 02:26, 262F
噓
05/14 06:55, , 263F
05/14 06:55, 263F
推
05/14 10:45, , 264F
05/14 10:45, 264F
→
05/14 10:45, , 265F
05/14 10:45, 265F
→
05/14 10:45, , 266F
05/14 10:45, 266F
→
05/14 10:46, , 267F
05/14 10:46, 267F
推
05/14 14:38, , 268F
05/14 14:38, 268F
推
05/14 15:27, , 269F
05/14 15:27, 269F
推
05/14 16:44, , 270F
05/14 16:44, 270F
推
05/14 17:21, , 271F
05/14 17:21, 271F
→
05/14 17:22, , 272F
05/14 17:22, 272F
→
05/14 17:22, , 273F
05/14 17:22, 273F
→
05/14 17:23, , 274F
05/14 17:23, 274F
→
05/14 17:45, , 275F
05/14 17:45, 275F
→
05/16 11:54, , 276F
05/16 11:54, 276F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文 (最舊先):
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 13 篇):