作者查詢 / yauhh
作者 yauhh 在 PTT [ logic ] 看板的留言(推文), 共386則
限定看板:logic
看板排序:
全部Soft_Job2172Master_D1344Tokusatsu1142JingXingBoys948C_and_CPP649Programming615logic386Lomo364Coffee298Visual_Basic231Cloud197PeopleSeries128Emergency124AndroidDev121Prob_Solve119Little-Games117photo102gallantry87CSSE78PLT78ComeHere77C_Sharp72book56CTV46Python44ShiauLiang42poem39Gossiping35L_TalkandCha35CodeJob28Ajax26L_LifeJob24magic_silver23Inference22Guolun20FJU-STAT95B19NCYU_BE_96b19NDHU-phy10119NIU-ECE94b19Isayama17LaTeX17soho15KingofPop12RealPlaying12TKU_EW94B12Linux10NTU-IPH9610NUK_AC9810share10Translate-CS10AfterPhD9NCKU-BEH959Christianity8FLAT_CLUB8NCCUflamenco8NCHU_CsHsnu8SYSOP8Viator98Bing8W-Philosophy8NUU-EE-97A7sky7SSSH-16th-Fk7GameDesign6JinYong6media-chaos6Ptt-Charity6TaiwanDrama6ai-photo5GossipPicket5HCHS933145KS93-3165XiangSheng5CYCU_Chem92b4CYCU_ICE90AB4Emulator4HSNU_11464Interdiscip4JP_Entertain4Militarylife4NCCU05_GIDS4NCCU_PFBASE4NCHU-Wind4NDHU-Ch994Notebook4NTPU-CSIE954NTUEE_Speech4NTUST-EE-B934PhD4PttLaw4Starbucks4Windows4Boy-Girl3Buddhism3FinalFantasy3Gamesale3Google3HarryPotter3Hate3HCSHch13_3113Keelung3KUAS_CSIE3NCCU3NCTU_CS_EDA3NDSH_6th3143NSwitch3NSYSU-Chem993OOAD3paranormal3PhotoCritic3Salary3Sijhih3SSSH-16th3093STREET_BALL3Tech_Job3TigerBlue3Violation3army_53-2T2B97A013XX2comm_and_RF2CS95WISDOM2Dragonica2Ecophilia2Education2EmailYang2FJU_JCS112Folklore2HHSH2HK-movie2java2Jeans2KOTDFansClub2KS98-3022MCU_Talk2Men5432MUSTMIS2NARUTO2NCHU-AGR052NCHU-MEgradu2NCHU-Mount2NCHU_MBA972NCNUEM2NDHU-phy1022NewAge2NKUTEE2NSYSU_EE95-12ntnuch95c2NTOU-EBFS932NTPU-CSIE982NTUEE_LAB2062NTUST-TX-B962Patent2Peter_EN2PHP2PttHistory2PublicServan2PushDoll2SayLove2SuperBike2Tainan2THU_BA20002transgender2Yup-mwgc2Yup03-042About_Life1AD_NCCU_VB1Ancient1Android1Anti-ramp1ASHS-93-li1AU_Talk1Aviation1B98A013XX1Badminton1Beauty1BigSanchung1bookhouse1Browsers1Bus1Butterfly1C_ChatBM1CareerLady1ChangHua1Cheer1Childhood1CHSH-96-3101Civil1ck46th3311ck47th3201ck55th3071ck55th3201ck57th3211ck58th3241cksh82nd3211clmusic1Comic1consumer1CPSHS10th3031Cross_Life1CrossGate1CSI1CSMU-D991customers1dance1DIABLO1digger1DJ_fightman1DummyHistory1Editor1Employee1EuropeTravel1Facebook1facelift1Fiction1FishShrimp1FJU-Family1Fooyin1GuildWars1GUNNM1HanDian1HRM1HSNU_10351HSNU_10651HSNU_10951HSNU_11421Hualien1ILSH-973091Instant_Mess1japanavgirls1jhs_30_51JOJO1joke1kawaii1KERORO1KingdomHuang1KNU1KS90-3111KS92-3161KS93-3171KS94-3121KS95-3211KS96-3151KS97-3101KS97-3131KS97-3181KS97-3201KS_PMAC1Lifeismoney1Lineage1LTK1M_Manson1marvel1meditation1MIT1Modchip1MRT1Nantou1NatureSeeker1Navy1NBAEasyChat1NCCU-YP1NCCU06_JAPAN1NCCU08_LawB1NCCU_PubLaw1NCCU_SEED1NCHU-FS981NCHU-MKT991NCKU_CSIE931NCKU_MEPhC1NCTU_HARCLUB1NCU97ME-B1NDHU1NDHU_ACC_5TH1NKNU_Phy0981NPUST1NSYSU_MSOE991NTHU_EDA2231NTHU_HIS971NTHU_IEEM-941NTHUTL981NTNU-HISBK1NTNUMasSport1NTPU-COECO951NTPU-CSIE961NTPU-STAT951NTU1NTUGIEE_RFIC1NTUMBA-981NTUphy971NTUST_Talk1NTUT_ME495A1NYUST00_FING1Old-Games1PCCU_Talk1peianyang1PingTung1Printer_scan1PttLifeLaw1RO1Rock_OE1RPGMaker1RumikoTWorld1SailorMoon1ScienceNote1SCU_Law101D1Seiya1ShowOff1SHU-JourM981Shu-Lin1ShuangHe1SongShan1SOS1Spain1SSSH-09th1141StoneAge1SuperHeroes1Supermission1Supernatural1SWORD1TA_AN1Taipei1tajen1TamShui1Taoism1TFSHS61st3211TFSHS67th3211TFSHS68th3211Tin-Ha1TNFSH98th1translator1TTU-AFL1TTU-talk1TY_Research1TypeMoon1Volleyball1WarHammer1Wego5-yi1WorkanTravel1WorkinChina1YUGIOH1YZU_EE96B1YZU_MLSB1YZUfinGrad961ZQ-Physics1<< 收起看板(343)
3F推:乍聽有問題,但好像要解決 "網內 <-> 網內價" 的關係10/21 01:01
4F→:才能確定有矛盾10/21 01:01
1F推:上課啦上課啦 (敲鑼)10/18 02:20
2F推:那麼,推論規則是syntactically或semantically處理?10/18 02:24
1F→:唯若... 唯不正是"只有"意思嗎,若則是"如果"意思,所以我認為10/18 00:45
2F→:是only if10/18 00:45
1F→:寫錯... 應該用"滿足" |= , 而不是"產生" |-10/16 00:58
3F→:是說可能,省略這一段的評析而已10/16 04:02
4F→:我認為可以吃巧克力與吃巧克力的差別是,一個是命題,另一個是10/16 04:04
5F→:論述所滿足的情況10/16 04:04
4F推:"吃巧克力"要再被"可以"修飾,要跳二階了嗎?10/15 22:55
2F推:語句遇到只有都該解為iif或是 only if (<-) 呢?10/15 10:30
3F推:這應該是312想要表達的. 解得漂亮.10/15 10:39
3F推:我本來想看看他對於對我人身攻擊有沒有悔意,如果沒有,我申訴10/15 10:24
4F→:差不多也可以水桶他了10/15 10:24
5F→:原來S/s是"結案"的意思,話談得差不多就該打住了,別拖爛棚10/15 10:28
7F推:程序正義是什麼? 是說程序該是對的嗎?10/16 17:55
8F推:原來如此,不過被桶的人超自大的,說別人錯沒人幫他指證?10/16 17:58
9F→:自己說別人錯不指出明確錯處,不提出證明,卻說別人欠缺指證10/16 17:58
10F→:還說沒他就沒人定義集合? 夠了,根本不缺他一人10/16 18:00
2F→:補充:右肩不是沒好嗎? 好好養病休休生息10/14 12:02
3F→:那我可以申訴有人一直對我人身攻擊嗎?10/14 13:40
2F推:我有個小問題,證這個的人有什麼原因想證這個題目?10/14 12:07
4F推:直覺上自然數跟實數差很多,證S-B是要套用而證兩數系一樣多嗎10/14 13:22
5F推:哦,抱歉我看錯了,是自然數和整數10/14 13:25
27F推:別鬧了,翻了Proof of the Book的確將實數證為不可數,有理數10/15 23:12
28F→:和整數證為可數,然後談bijection. 相信他只是一時打錯而已,10/15 23:13
29F→:312當你說一定不能用Cantor,我會冒出個問號:"要不然是要用什10/15 23:14
30F→:麼?" 指出錯處不是這樣指的,因為別人會期待你提出替代方案.10/15 23:16
1F推:好可怕,突然我們就是在胡說八道了,突然我們又是在人身攻擊了10/14 08:27
2F→:無論我們看了多少書和資料,提出資料卻被抨擊為不知哪裡看來10/14 08:28
3F→:的,彷彿某個人講話比許多書與電子百科的份量更重許多.10/14 08:28
4F→:好可怕,我們提出理由卻隨便被說"胡說八道",而某人講人胡說八10/14 08:30
5F→:道卻一直都不必提出任何理由.10/14 08:30