作者查詢 / uka123ily
作者 uka123ily 在 PTT [ Teacher ] 看板的留言(推文), 共151則
限定看板：Teacher
看板排序：
全部gay8145Christianity6532PublicIssue3488GUNDAM2857Gossiping2595AfterPhD1637NTU1457W-Philosophy1328Master_D1225SENIORHIGH1142Education1139Policy1130PhD494TKU_Talk432LGBT_SEX426Tokusatsu421SRW316L_BoyMeetsGi268graduate204lesbian201textbook174MAC173IA169HumService152Teacher151MH148marriage127C_Chat121L_TalkandCha106Espannol103MobileComm75CCU_talk74Catholic61Channel_V59GossipPicket51medstudent47Ancient38About_Life36J-PopStation36JesusLove35feminine_sex30Falcom29SYSOP28C_ChatBM27Feminism27NCCU09_PHILO27Brethren26HSNU_114226movie26Buddhism25DragonQuest25FinalFantasy25SHENA-RINGO25haiku23creditcard22iOS22SW_Job22transgender22Confucianism21FLAT_CLUB21NDS21NSwitch21Aviation20TKU_CME96B19FJU18iPod18Seiya17DIGIMON16media-chaos15PSP-PSV15Sandy14EqualRights13CrossStrait12Macross12Militarylife12NCCU08_Ethno12nCoV201912sex12bi-sexual11BraveSaga11LAW11GreenParty10Marxism10RESIT10Sociology10TO-LesQu10ck-talk9model9PUBLICISS_PT9AU_Talk8KMT8LatinAmerica8PCSH91_3058pet8Salary8study8AC_In7AdvEduUK7book7cat7CSMU-CM-OP7KOU7medache7MEI-CHYI7SuperStarAve7Utada7Violation7Asexual6digitalk6HatePolitics6Health_Life6L_HappyLivin6LoL6TKU-Strategy6BookService5CSMU-MED975Ecophilia5JapanMovie5joke5junji-ITO5MCU_Talk5NCCU5NCCU08_HISTO5ONE_PIECE5popmusic5PuzzleDragon5studyteacher5WeiLi-geo5CKKC3132334CMU_CM444D_Fin_Law_924EarthQuake264EarthQuake434EUREKA4Lawyer4learnyf4Monotheism4NHU_Talk4NSYSU_EE95-14Nurse4pighead4RIPE_gender4SCU_Talk4scu_transfer4Suckcomic4TamShui4Aboriginal3AGEC993Bank_Service3CHU3ck59th3063DPP3Examination3HSNU_11123HSNU_8203Japandrama3kochikame3NCCU09_MAENG3NCCU_SEED3NTNU-HISBK3PttHistory3rent-exp3studyabroad3THU_BA20003THU_Talk3Trans_Study3AboutBoards2Anti-ramp2ChildrensDay2cksh85th3012CSMU-MED932DirectSales2dlsh-7th-3032Drama2Employee2FTHS-1582FuMouDiscuss2Google2Joi2MRT2NCCU_CCSH2NewYork2Nintendo2NTUGIPO_PNSL2NTUmed002NUK_AC982Olympics_ISG2PCSH_talk2Physics2psychedelico2Slayers2tattoo_ring2TNFSH98th2Tour-Manager2Transformers2TYSH50-3032WuLing46-3172AnimMovie1ArakawaCow1ASHS-93-li1Atheism1Bio-Job1Biology1Buddha1Cancer1CCU-GIE981Certificate1CFP1Cheer1CHING1civic_life1ck58th3111cksh79th011Cobras1CODE_GEASS1Conan1CPU_7711CS_TEACHER1CTSH97EXP1DiscoveryNGC1DistantLove1documentary1Doraemon1Drum1ESP1Evangelion1Finance1FineArt1FJU-ACCR941FJU-Stat95A1Folklore1GarbageCan1Gintama1GONZO1H-GAME1HarukiMuraka1HCSH_10th3121HCU1Holland1HSNU_10371HSNU_11461humanity1japanavgirls1JP_Entertain1juniorhigh1kawaii1Kids_Sucker1KingdomHuang1Kitty_Sanrio1kodomo1Kojima1KS93-3161KS94-3021KS94-3181KS95-3141KS96-3141KS98-3021LadyGaga1LightNovel1Lo-Sheng1London1LTK1MacShop1marvel1MetalGear1mknoheya1mobile-game1NCCU01_DIP1NCCU07_Ghis1NCCU_SSSH1NCHU-AE981NCHU-CE-SB1NCHUS1NetRumor1NKFUST1NTOU-MME-99B1NTOUEE981NTUOCGeo1NTUT_IPET4951NYUST98_FING1Ocean1Oceanography1Odoko-juku1P2PSoftWare1Patent1PCCU_Talk1PCman1PHS1PlayStation1PoliceRadio1PoliticLaw1politics1Pride1PT-961PublicAffair1PublicServan1Publish1Queer_drama1QueerHabit1Reptile1Rockman1Salesperson1San-Ying1Scout1SetMeUp1SFFamily1Shima-Kosaku1SHU-Gender951single1SK_SD_PL1SlamDunk1So-Edition1Sorry_Youth1SoulEater1SpongeBob1SSSH-16th-Fk1TaichungBun1Tainan1Taitung1TAS1TCFSH67TH101Tennis1Terry1TFSHS65th3131TFSHS65th3151TFSHS65th3201TFSHS67th3091TFSHS68th3021THEBACKHORN1THULAW1TNNUA-MUSEUM1TORIKO1TryingTimes1TSU1TW-language1UglyClub1USC1vetbasket1Vocaloid1WesternMusic1YMSC_94_3191Yup01-031Yup03-041Yup99-081YZU_CN99A1YZU_MBA971Z-Chen1ZenKwun1Zombie1<< 收起看板(349)
2F推: 除了菜花以外，我想不到有說的必要。09/07 22:14
48F推:台灣公民社會科教師訓練的問題是「來源」。07/03 22:11
2F推:理論上衛生局應該比你早知道？04/02 19:33
8F推:打小報告其實是好事10/26 15:29
24F推:你可以問翁山蘇姬06/04 11:36
26F推:理性代表他是符合自我的偏好06/05 18:25
31F推:90 99真的沒差很多05/05 23:59
33F推:潛力跟資質並沒有差很多，當然分數是有段差距05/06 00:32
34F→:而且國中成績或考試本來就很難去預測未來的發展05/06 00:34
41F推:這差距能代表什麼？ 這就是我所謂沒什麼差的意思05/06 01:54
42F→:已學術研究來說，這PR90的人未來就不能念到博士之類？05/06 01:56
43F→:況且人數有差距，那分數又是差多少？這區間是多少？05/06 01:57
44F→:你認為國中程度考試很合理可以區分這些？05/06 01:58
48F推:差很多是怎麼差，看你看重的是什麼吧05/06 03:17
50F→:這些人才能是能有多差？ 還算是可以培養的05/06 03:18
51F→:你都當過不就證明我說的，這並不是一個很明顯的區隔05/06 03:19
53F→:而且國中到高中還是可以塑造的階段，都還很難說05/06 03:20
56F推:到高中就會知道再完整，也比不過認真05/06 03:22
57F→:到高中一鬆懈，馬上就被後面輸你很多的超過05/06 03:22
60F→:我的意思是 這只是一個階段，PR90都還是可造之材05/06 03:23
64F推:身邊還蠻多的，倒是掉下來的很多05/06 03:27
65F→:很難說這些差距就真的代表一個人資質的好壞05/06 03:28
66F→:還有很多人格特質，求學態度，興趣都不在這裡面05/06 03:28
2F推:應該說讀經是個人選擇，但主張有幫助就是需要證據04/05 10:19
9F推:不須理解的話，那背圓周率就好啦04/05 12:48
10F→:至少還可以上新聞或是拿破紀錄的獎金04/05 12:49
15F推:字彙量沒有人說要用背的阿04/06 09:42
16F→:有人是說不需要理解啦，因此問題不是在於理解多少04/06 09:43
8F→:應該是說經典到底在這個西化的社會地位如何04/04 23:34
9F→:這是一個需要思考跟論述的，新儒家那套論述還很弱04/04 23:34
15F→:西方研究又不是要拿來做公民教育的04/05 12:50
9F推:你得到他了04/02 21:46
10F→:歷史很有用但也沒人你去背.....04/02 21:47
11F→:例如從某些戰爭了解殘酷，但沒人要你讀過所有戰爭04/02 21:47
14F推:就算歷史要背也就那些，沒人叫你去背其他有的沒的04/02 22:01
15F→:而且問題不是反對背這件事，而是背後的企圖何在04/02 22:02
16F→:為什麼要無條件複製某些經典？？？？04/02 22:03
17F→:就像歷史也有史觀的問題04/02 22:03
25F→:所以讀經是美學的教育？04/02 22:37
29F→:那個其實就沒什麼可以證明的，就是一個被連結的故事04/04 23:35
2F推:這「自主」是對孩子來說還是家長？04/02 22:06
4F推:推文04/02 22:36