Re: 認同威權當然覺得威權與否不重要
威權體制下..有無因此獲益的人? 有無既得利益者.假如答案是有的話
那麼會有人挺這個體制也不令人意外..
過去國家考試依省區分發..大陸地區選出來的資深民代永遠不必改選.
這些都是當時針對特定人士'圖利'的產物.當時政策底下..倘若效忠黨國
會有好處可'卡'.你想會不會有人擔當黨國打手? 一定會的啊
那個時候.軍公教三處.算是黨國思想滲透最深的地方..國小讀書時.
除了教科書盛讚國民黨外.校長.老師也整天說國民黨好話.然後什麼國語文運動執行徹底
不惜搞出說台語要罰錢..母姊會時.如果某個小朋友的家長講台語.老師對他的小孩
印象就會打折.黨國高官的小孩如果仗勢欺人.學校沒辦法也不敢處理.
甚至於國中時.老師喊三民主義統一中國.底下學生發表意見說台灣應是獨立個體
老師不爽的下場.就是請他罰站一整堂課.當個學生.連黨國都不能違背.你就知當時
管控多嚴了
另一個產物是中華民國反共救國團.早年國民黨也利用這個宣傳黨政思想.
當時的高中.大學生也會湧躍參加.特別是男孩子.WHY? 這可是關係你能不能考預官喔.
他們當然要參加..學校也會有教官問你要不要入國民黨.那就更不用說了.
還有就是工商方面.過去經商..要接國家案件..要受國家扶持.多少也要有效忠黨國的觀念
國家才願意挺..如果那個商人因為這樣而受益.他也會挺這政權吧
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 111.248.4.101
推
12/17 10:37, , 1F
12/17 10:37, 1F
推
12/17 10:38, , 2F
12/17 10:38, 2F
→
12/17 10:38, , 3F
12/17 10:38, 3F
→
12/17 10:39, , 4F
12/17 10:39, 4F
→
12/17 10:39, , 5F
12/17 10:39, 5F
→
12/17 10:39, , 6F
12/17 10:39, 6F
→
12/17 10:40, , 7F
12/17 10:40, 7F
→
12/17 10:41, , 8F
12/17 10:41, 8F
→
12/17 10:44, , 9F
12/17 10:44, 9F
推
12/17 10:48, , 10F
12/17 10:48, 10F
→
12/17 10:50, , 11F
12/17 10:50, 11F
推
12/17 10:53, , 12F
12/17 10:53, 12F
→
12/17 10:53, , 13F
12/17 10:53, 13F
→
12/17 10:54, , 14F
12/17 10:54, 14F
推
12/17 10:55, , 15F
12/17 10:55, 15F
→
12/17 10:55, , 16F
12/17 10:55, 16F
→
12/17 10:55, , 17F
12/17 10:55, 17F
→
12/17 10:55, , 18F
12/17 10:55, 18F
→
12/17 10:55, , 19F
12/17 10:55, 19F
推
12/17 11:10, , 20F
12/17 11:10, 20F
→
12/17 11:10, , 21F
12/17 11:10, 21F
→
12/17 11:11, , 22F
12/17 11:11, 22F
→
12/17 11:11, , 23F
12/17 11:11, 23F
→
12/17 11:11, , 24F
12/17 11:11, 24F
→
12/17 11:16, , 25F
12/17 11:16, 25F
→
12/17 11:17, , 26F
12/17 11:17, 26F
推
12/17 11:20, , 27F
12/17 11:20, 27F
→
12/17 11:20, , 28F
12/17 11:20, 28F
→
12/17 11:21, , 29F
12/17 11:21, 29F
推
12/17 11:21, , 30F
12/17 11:21, 30F
→
12/17 11:21, , 31F
12/17 11:21, 31F
→
12/17 11:21, , 32F
12/17 11:21, 32F
→
12/17 11:24, , 33F
12/17 11:24, 33F
→
12/17 11:29, , 34F
12/17 11:29, 34F
推
12/17 11:30, , 35F
12/17 11:30, 35F
→
12/17 11:30, , 36F
12/17 11:30, 36F
→
12/17 11:30, , 37F
12/17 11:30, 37F
推
12/17 11:32, , 38F
12/17 11:32, 38F
→
12/17 11:33, , 39F
12/17 11:33, 39F
→
12/17 11:33, , 40F
12/17 11:33, 40F
→
12/17 11:34, , 41F
12/17 11:34, 41F
→
12/17 11:48, , 42F
12/17 11:48, 42F
→
12/17 11:49, , 43F
12/17 11:49, 43F
→
12/17 11:50, , 44F
12/17 11:50, 44F
→
12/17 11:50, , 45F
12/17 11:50, 45F
→
12/17 11:50, , 46F
12/17 11:50, 46F
推
12/17 11:53, , 47F
12/17 11:53, 47F
→
12/17 11:53, , 48F
12/17 11:53, 48F
→
12/17 11:53, , 49F
12/17 11:53, 49F
→
12/17 11:54, , 50F
12/17 11:54, 50F
→
12/17 11:55, , 51F
12/17 11:55, 51F
→
12/17 12:06, , 52F
12/17 12:06, 52F
推
12/17 15:43, , 53F
12/17 15:43, 53F
→
12/17 16:49, , 54F
12/17 16:49, 54F
→
12/17 16:49, , 55F
12/17 16:49, 55F
→
12/17 21:23, , 56F
12/17 21:23, 56F
→
12/17 22:49, , 57F
12/17 22:49, 57F
→
12/17 23:13, , 58F
12/17 23:13, 58F
推
12/18 13:43, , 59F
12/18 13:43, 59F
→
12/18 13:44, , 60F
12/18 13:44, 60F
→
12/18 13:45, , 61F
12/18 13:45, 61F
→
12/18 23:55, , 62F
12/18 23:55, 62F
→
12/18 23:55, , 63F
12/18 23:55, 63F
→
12/18 23:56, , 64F
12/18 23:56, 64F
→
12/18 23:56, , 65F
12/18 23:56, 65F
→
12/18 23:57, , 66F
12/18 23:57, 66F
→
12/18 23:58, , 67F
12/18 23:58, 67F
→
12/18 23:59, , 68F
12/18 23:59, 68F
→
12/18 23:59, , 69F
12/18 23:59, 69F
→
12/18 23:59, , 70F
12/18 23:59, 70F
→
12/19 00:10, , 71F
12/19 00:10, 71F
→
12/19 00:11, , 72F
12/19 00:11, 72F
→
12/19 00:11, , 73F
12/19 00:11, 73F
→
12/19 00:15, , 74F
12/19 00:15, 74F
→
12/19 00:16, , 75F
12/19 00:16, 75F
→
12/19 00:16, , 76F
12/19 00:16, 76F
→
12/19 00:17, , 77F
12/19 00:17, 77F
→
12/19 00:18, , 78F
12/19 00:18, 78F
→
12/19 00:21, , 79F
12/19 00:21, 79F
→
12/19 00:22, , 80F
12/19 00:22, 80F
推
12/19 00:24, , 81F
12/19 00:24, 81F
→
12/19 00:35, , 82F
12/19 00:35, 82F
→
12/19 00:36, , 83F
12/19 00:36, 83F
推
12/19 00:55, , 84F
12/19 00:55, 84F
→
12/19 00:55, , 85F
12/19 00:55, 85F
推
12/19 09:28, , 86F
12/19 09:28, 86F
→
12/19 09:29, , 87F
12/19 09:29, 87F
→
12/19 19:37, , 88F
12/19 19:37, 88F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文:
完整討論串 (本文為第 3 之 6 篇):