Re: [心得] 為什麼沒3.5耳機孔會有人反應這麼大
過去我是個電信業的Trainning講師,
參加Apple內部的訓練時間不多不長,大約三年
如果從Apple的角度來思考這件事情的話,也許就不會太突兀
我自己的思考邏輯是這樣:
( 先說我對音質的部分並沒有特別講究,也並沒有辦法分辨音質的差異,
對我來說,有得聽不要破音就好了.... )
手機需要充電孔,也同時需要耳機孔來聽音樂,
但如果能夠把兩個"洞",變成只有一個,很方便,因為另外一個空間可以拿來
做其他的事情,也許就像庫克說的,可以加大音響、加強電力等等
然而最大反對問題來了:
如果我要同時充電跟聽音樂怎麼辦?
先思考為什麼這兩件事情會同時出現。
如果我在家,那麼我音樂會用喇叭放出來,或是用Apple TV,因為整合了
Apple Music ( 雖然我知道這不如Spotify,但我有些歌曲只有這邊有..)
反之如果我在外面,一定是接耳機,那麼誰會希望帶著行動電源聽音樂呢?
當然,這就扯到一個問題了 電量 是否足夠使用?
而這個問題其實一直以來Apple都有說明:Apple的電量表示永遠不會是xxxxmAh
而是可以連續使用XX小時。
所以Apple其實只要認真解決一件事情,續航力。
坦白說對我來講,耳機是不是變成 lighting,我真的不是這麼在意了..
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 123.192.193.122
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/iPhone/M.1473875740.A.B84.html
推
09/15 02:03, , 1F
09/15 02:03, 1F
推
09/15 02:06, , 2F
09/15 02:06, 2F
→
09/15 02:08, , 3F
09/15 02:08, 3F
→
09/15 02:08, , 4F
09/15 02:08, 4F
推
09/15 02:10, , 5F
09/15 02:10, 5F
→
09/15 02:14, , 6F
09/15 02:14, 6F
推
09/15 02:15, , 7F
09/15 02:15, 7F
→
09/15 02:16, , 8F
09/15 02:16, 8F
→
09/15 02:16, , 9F
09/15 02:16, 9F
→
09/15 02:16, , 10F
09/15 02:16, 10F
推
09/15 02:19, , 11F
09/15 02:19, 11F
噓
09/15 02:26, , 12F
09/15 02:26, 12F
噓
09/15 02:31, , 13F
09/15 02:31, 13F
推
09/15 02:34, , 14F
09/15 02:34, 14F
→
09/15 02:34, , 15F
09/15 02:34, 15F
→
09/15 02:34, , 16F
09/15 02:34, 16F
推
09/15 02:36, , 17F
09/15 02:36, 17F
→
09/15 02:36, , 18F
09/15 02:36, 18F
→
09/15 02:37, , 19F
09/15 02:37, 19F
推
09/15 02:39, , 20F
09/15 02:39, 20F
→
09/15 02:41, , 21F
09/15 02:41, 21F
推
09/15 02:43, , 22F
09/15 02:43, 22F
→
09/15 02:43, , 23F
09/15 02:43, 23F
→
09/15 02:43, , 24F
09/15 02:43, 24F
→
09/15 02:44, , 25F
09/15 02:44, 25F
→
09/15 02:44, , 26F
09/15 02:44, 26F
推
09/15 02:45, , 27F
09/15 02:45, 27F
推
09/15 02:53, , 28F
09/15 02:53, 28F
→
09/15 02:53, , 29F
09/15 02:53, 29F
推
09/15 02:56, , 30F
09/15 02:56, 30F
→
09/15 02:56, , 31F
09/15 02:56, 31F
→
09/15 02:56, , 32F
09/15 02:56, 32F
→
09/15 02:56, , 33F
09/15 02:56, 33F
→
09/15 02:56, , 34F
09/15 02:56, 34F
→
09/15 02:56, , 35F
09/15 02:56, 35F
→
09/15 02:56, , 36F
09/15 02:56, 36F
推
09/15 03:08, , 37F
09/15 03:08, 37F
推
09/15 03:18, , 38F
09/15 03:18, 38F
推
09/15 03:20, , 39F
09/15 03:20, 39F
推
09/15 04:59, , 40F
09/15 04:59, 40F
噓
09/15 05:26, , 41F
09/15 05:26, 41F
推
09/15 05:39, , 42F
09/15 05:39, 42F
推
09/15 06:24, , 43F
09/15 06:24, 43F
推
09/15 06:25, , 44F
09/15 06:25, 44F
噓
09/15 06:30, , 45F
09/15 06:30, 45F
推
09/15 07:01, , 46F
09/15 07:01, 46F
→
09/15 07:01, , 47F
09/15 07:01, 47F
→
09/15 07:01, , 48F
09/15 07:01, 48F
噓
09/15 07:11, , 49F
09/15 07:11, 49F
→
09/15 07:11, , 50F
09/15 07:11, 50F
噓
09/15 07:19, , 51F
09/15 07:19, 51F
→
09/15 07:19, , 52F
09/15 07:19, 52F
→
09/15 07:20, , 53F
09/15 07:20, 53F
→
09/15 07:20, , 54F
09/15 07:20, 54F
推
09/15 07:24, , 55F
09/15 07:24, 55F
推
09/15 07:42, , 56F
09/15 07:42, 56F
→
09/15 07:42, , 57F
09/15 07:42, 57F
推
09/15 08:08, , 58F
09/15 08:08, 58F
噓
09/15 08:18, , 59F
09/15 08:18, 59F
噓
09/15 08:45, , 60F
09/15 08:45, 60F
→
09/15 09:12, , 61F
09/15 09:12, 61F
噓
09/15 09:17, , 62F
09/15 09:17, 62F
噓
09/15 09:27, , 63F
09/15 09:27, 63F
噓
09/15 09:29, , 64F
09/15 09:29, 64F
噓
09/15 10:48, , 65F
09/15 10:48, 65F
噓
09/15 11:08, , 66F
09/15 11:08, 66F
推
09/15 11:47, , 67F
09/15 11:47, 67F
噓
09/15 12:07, , 68F
09/15 12:07, 68F
→
09/15 15:57, , 69F
09/15 15:57, 69F
→
09/15 15:58, , 70F
09/15 15:58, 70F
→
09/15 15:59, , 71F
09/15 15:59, 71F
→
09/15 15:59, , 72F
09/15 15:59, 72F
→
09/15 15:59, , 73F
09/15 15:59, 73F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文:
完整討論串 (本文為第 17 之 20 篇):