[問題] 福特比牛頭安全的說法是根據什麼來的?
就比較Focus跟Altis
NCAP:
http://i.imgur.com/V6Zj5uz.jpg
兩台差不多
iihs:
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=MhtRraJhi0E
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=9AnNSfVds9M
這…focus的A柱比Altis還慘吧
你說Altis不是歐規美規
但Focus也是國產 怎麼知道會跟國外版本相同
而且11.5代Altis還是採歐規版
再來鄉民最愛講的板金跟硼鋼
硼鋼有多硬我是不知道
我只知道有硼鋼的Fiesta撞起來好像沒比較強
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=Gp9ujLpnXpo
看一下新世代的elantra跟Altis
https://m.youtube.com/watch?list=PL45A6F77C93B2590A&v=XxdJDqCYGY4
https://m.youtube.com/watch?list=PL45A6F77C93B2590A&v=LdD-7TG7b00
那A柱之完整
所以可以得到的結論是
安全跟鈑金厚度還有鋼性沒有絕對的關係吧
重點是你的車體結構怎麼設計
回到主題
我當然不是想強調Altis多安全
在我看來 台灣撞擊測試如此黑箱的情況下
根本沒有辦法比較 車輛的安全性
尤其是國產車
進口車 也不能保證 輸入台灣的與國外是一樣
例如RAV4 小惡魔有網友網友研究
為了因應iihs的強化版本
台灣引進的根本沒有那個強化版的零件
(舉這個例子證明我非和泰派來的)
所以最後我還是想問
福特比牛頭牌安全的說法是根據什麼來的?
鈑金厚的車比較安全的說法又是根據什麼來的?
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 180.217.176.207
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/car/M.1490802299.A.FA2.html
→
03/29 23:46, , 1F
03/29 23:46, 1F
推
03/29 23:47, , 2F
03/29 23:47, 2F
→
03/29 23:47, , 3F
03/29 23:47, 3F
→
03/29 23:48, , 4F
03/29 23:48, 4F
推
03/29 23:49, , 5F
03/29 23:49, 5F
→
03/29 23:49, , 6F
03/29 23:49, 6F
推
03/29 23:49, , 7F
03/29 23:49, 7F
推
03/29 23:49, , 8F
03/29 23:49, 8F
→
03/29 23:55, , 9F
03/29 23:55, 9F
→
03/29 23:55, , 10F
03/29 23:55, 10F
推
03/29 23:57, , 11F
03/29 23:57, 11F
→
03/29 23:58, , 12F
03/29 23:58, 12F
→
03/29 23:58, , 13F
03/29 23:58, 13F
→
03/29 23:59, , 14F
03/29 23:59, 14F
→
03/30 00:02, , 15F
03/30 00:02, 15F
推
03/30 00:05, , 16F
03/30 00:05, 16F
推
03/30 00:06, , 17F
03/30 00:06, 17F
推
03/30 00:06, , 18F
03/30 00:06, 18F
噓
03/30 00:07, , 19F
03/30 00:07, 19F
噓
03/30 00:08, , 20F
03/30 00:08, 20F
推
03/30 00:09, , 21F
03/30 00:09, 21F
→
03/30 00:15, , 22F
03/30 00:15, 22F
→
03/30 00:16, , 23F
03/30 00:16, 23F
→
03/30 00:17, , 24F
03/30 00:17, 24F
→
03/30 00:18, , 25F
03/30 00:18, 25F
→
03/30 00:19, , 26F
03/30 00:19, 26F
→
03/30 00:20, , 27F
03/30 00:20, 27F
→
03/30 00:20, , 28F
03/30 00:20, 28F
→
03/30 00:20, , 29F
03/30 00:20, 29F
→
03/30 00:21, , 30F
03/30 00:21, 30F
推
03/30 00:21, , 31F
03/30 00:21, 31F
→
03/30 00:21, , 32F
03/30 00:21, 32F
→
03/30 00:22, , 33F
03/30 00:22, 33F
→
03/30 00:22, , 34F
03/30 00:22, 34F
推
03/30 00:23, , 35F
03/30 00:23, 35F
→
03/30 00:27, , 36F
03/30 00:27, 36F
→
03/30 00:27, , 37F
03/30 00:27, 37F
→
03/30 00:28, , 38F
03/30 00:28, 38F
→
03/30 00:29, , 39F
03/30 00:29, 39F
還有 78 則推文
噓
03/30 08:22, , 118F
03/30 08:22, 118F
推
03/30 08:47, , 119F
03/30 08:47, 119F
→
03/30 08:48, , 120F
03/30 08:48, 120F
噓
03/30 08:49, , 121F
03/30 08:49, 121F
推
03/30 08:52, , 122F
03/30 08:52, 122F
→
03/30 08:52, , 123F
03/30 08:52, 123F
噓
03/30 08:59, , 124F
03/30 08:59, 124F
噓
03/30 09:00, , 125F
03/30 09:00, 125F
推
03/30 09:04, , 126F
03/30 09:04, 126F
→
03/30 09:05, , 127F
03/30 09:05, 127F
噓
03/30 09:25, , 128F
03/30 09:25, 128F
推
03/30 09:29, , 129F
03/30 09:29, 129F
→
03/30 09:46, , 130F
03/30 09:46, 130F
推
03/30 09:54, , 131F
03/30 09:54, 131F
→
03/30 09:54, , 132F
03/30 09:54, 132F
→
03/30 09:54, , 133F
03/30 09:54, 133F
推
03/30 10:16, , 134F
03/30 10:16, 134F
→
03/30 10:17, , 135F
03/30 10:17, 135F
→
03/30 10:55, , 136F
03/30 10:55, 136F
→
03/30 11:06, , 137F
03/30 11:06, 137F
噓
03/30 11:13, , 138F
03/30 11:13, 138F
推
03/30 11:13, , 139F
03/30 11:13, 139F
推
03/30 11:15, , 140F
03/30 11:15, 140F
噓
03/30 11:22, , 141F
03/30 11:22, 141F
推
03/30 11:23, , 142F
03/30 11:23, 142F
噓
03/30 11:36, , 143F
03/30 11:36, 143F
推
03/30 11:39, , 144F
03/30 11:39, 144F
推
03/30 11:41, , 145F
03/30 11:41, 145F
推
03/30 12:04, , 146F
03/30 12:04, 146F
→
03/30 12:04, , 147F
03/30 12:04, 147F
→
03/30 12:05, , 148F
03/30 12:05, 148F
推
03/30 12:07, , 149F
03/30 12:07, 149F
噓
03/30 12:47, , 150F
03/30 12:47, 150F
→
03/30 13:04, , 151F
03/30 13:04, 151F
→
03/30 13:46, , 152F
03/30 13:46, 152F
噓
03/30 17:52, , 153F
03/30 17:52, 153F
→
03/30 21:48, , 154F
03/30 21:48, 154F
噓
03/30 21:56, , 155F
03/30 21:56, 155F
噓
03/31 12:30, , 156F
03/31 12:30, 156F
→
03/31 12:30, , 157F
03/31 12:30, 157F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文 (最舊先):
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 9 篇):