Re: [討論] 所謂的開發強者是怎麼樣子的?

看板Soft_Job作者 (3d)時間1年前 (2022/11/15 07:47), 編輯推噓2(200)
留言2則, 2人參與, 1年前最新討論串11/13 (看更多)
一個週末寫TensorFlow或可以救火幾百次的。那是神人,我們凡人作不到,也不適合我們參考。 我記得 "Mythical man month"有提到,一個專業程式師一天平均寫10行程式。 那如何有效率利用這短短的幾行程式才是重點。 那如何成為有效率的0.1x工程師? https://benjiweber.co.uk/blog/2016/01/25/why-i-strive-to-be-a-0-1x-engineer/ https://tinyurl.com/y62xeak3 這篇很好可以看看 最重點 Let’s not build that feature. ( Is there existing software that could be used instead?) Let’s not add this functionality. ( Does the complexity it will introduce really justify its existence?) Let’s not build that product yet. ( Can we first do some small things to test the assumption that it will be valuable?) Let’s not build/deploy that development tool. ( Can we adjust our process or practices instead to make it unnecessary?) Let’s not adopt this new technology. ( Can we achieve the same thing with a technology that the team is already using and familiar with? “The best tool for the job” is a very dangerous phrase.) Let’s not keep maintaining this feature. ( What is blocking us from deleting this code?) Let’s not automate this. ( Can we find a way to not need to do it all?) 一個凡人能寫的文件,程式都有限,如何取捨是我們需要好好考慮與學習的。 ------------------ PS:我不喜歡Elon Musk,他現在處理twitter的方式也太粗暴,但他有些想法是值得我們學習的。 砍掉Microservice,砍掉無用的功能如(也許他是亂砍一通) https://i.imgur.com/APxfO9E.png
就看他如何精簡功能,看看那些考慮是值得我們學習的。 -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 101.137.165.66 (臺灣) ※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/Soft_Job/M.1668469641.A.9A2.html

11/15 11:42, 1年前 , 1F
目標正確,但是 refactor 的很粗暴,常見的老人新人衝突..
11/15 11:42, 1F

11/15 11:47, 1年前 , 2F
推。Gene Kim: 任何在非瓶頸上的最佳化成效都是幻覺。
11/15 11:47, 2F
文章代碼(AID): #1ZSjE9cY (Soft_Job)
討論串 (同標題文章)
文章代碼(AID): #1ZSjE9cY (Soft_Job)