Re: [情報] 戰國無雙三美版 IGN評分
看板Sangokumusou作者jackthegreat (jackthegreat)時間13年前 (2010/10/05 12:59)推噓35(35推 0噓 28→)留言63則, 33人參與討論串2/6 (看更多)
: -------------------------
: Presentation 5.0
: Even the menus and options of the game are dated. Playing this game makes you
: feel like you’re playing a retro game. Sadly, you’re not.
: 像是在玩懷舊遊戲,即使是選單都顯得過時
一款以歷史模擬遊戲為主題的公司 以歷史為主題而進行改編的動作遊戲
藉著日式古風表現方式 給予玩家歷史帶入感本來就是理所當然
毫無文化內涵的國家無法體會這樣的風格
: Graphics 3.5
: This game is ugly even with platform considerations. You may have a lot of
: guys on screen, but they all largely look like the same ugly dude.
:
我來完整翻譯一下這段話:
"即使把平台因素考慮進去,依然很醜陋。
在螢幕上的眾多雜魚看起來很醜而且臉都長得一樣。"
為什麼一款遊戲的雜魚長得醜而且長的一樣 就會讓他Graphics分數低的如此離譜?
這麼說來惡靈古堡之類的遊戲 雜魚都還長的不成人形 他們的graphic應該給0分!!
: Sound 3.0
: The voice acting and music is awful. If you insist on playing this game, I’d
: recommend doing it with the TV muted.
: 配音與音樂都很嚇人,如果你堅持要玩這款遊戲,建議把電視開無聲
: (譯註:我覺得日版的配音、音樂還不錯啊XD)
美版的語音沒有聽過所以不予置評 但日版語音都是專業聲優配音
在亞洲地區也鮮有對配音不滿的聲音
以日本歷史來改編的遊戲 BGM本身帶有日本傳統風格本來就很正常
我懷疑IGN的評論者根本就對美國以外 世界各地的民族風音樂毫無概念可言
"The music is great, but American's ears are motherfuxxing awful!!"
: Gameplay 3.0
: While many gameplay formulas stand the test of time, the Warriors one is not
: among them. This game is so repetitive and mindless that making it just might
: actually make you dumber.
: 遊玩過程重複而無腦
: (譯註:美媒評分通常不會給無雙式遊戲好臉色)
The game is fine. L2P(Learn to Play)
: Lasting Appeal 3.5
: Sure, there’s a lot of game here, but why would you want to play this over
: and over unless you were forced to?
: 有那麼多遊戲可選,除非有人逼你,不然何必一再玩它?
不爽不要玩 !!!
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 140.113.123.237
推
10/05 13:03, , 1F
10/05 13:03, 1F
推
10/05 13:06, , 2F
10/05 13:06, 2F
→
10/05 13:07, , 3F
10/05 13:07, 3F
推
10/05 13:07, , 4F
10/05 13:07, 4F
→
10/05 13:08, , 5F
10/05 13:08, 5F
→
10/05 13:09, , 6F
10/05 13:09, 6F
→
10/05 13:09, , 7F
10/05 13:09, 7F
→
10/05 13:09, , 8F
10/05 13:09, 8F
推
10/05 13:17, , 9F
10/05 13:17, 9F
推
10/05 13:41, , 10F
10/05 13:41, 10F
推
10/05 13:46, , 11F
10/05 13:46, 11F
推
10/05 14:03, , 12F
10/05 14:03, 12F
推
10/05 14:11, , 13F
10/05 14:11, 13F
推
10/05 14:47, , 14F
10/05 14:47, 14F
推
10/05 15:47, , 15F
10/05 15:47, 15F
推
10/05 15:51, , 16F
10/05 15:51, 16F
→
10/05 16:17, , 17F
10/05 16:17, 17F
推
10/05 16:17, , 18F
10/05 16:17, 18F
→
10/05 16:18, , 19F
10/05 16:18, 19F
推
10/05 16:46, , 20F
10/05 16:46, 20F
推
10/05 16:53, , 21F
10/05 16:53, 21F
推
10/05 18:34, , 22F
10/05 18:34, 22F
推
10/05 18:40, , 23F
10/05 18:40, 23F
推
10/05 18:43, , 24F
10/05 18:43, 24F
推
10/05 19:26, , 25F
10/05 19:26, 25F
推
10/05 21:11, , 26F
10/05 21:11, 26F
推
10/05 23:04, , 27F
10/05 23:04, 27F
→
10/05 23:30, , 28F
10/05 23:30, 28F
推
10/06 00:01, , 29F
10/06 00:01, 29F
推
10/06 02:47, , 30F
10/06 02:47, 30F
→
10/06 14:03, , 31F
10/06 14:03, 31F
→
10/06 17:35, , 32F
10/06 17:35, 32F
→
10/06 23:43, , 33F
10/06 23:43, 33F
→
10/06 23:47, , 34F
10/06 23:47, 34F
→
10/06 23:47, , 35F
10/06 23:47, 35F
→
10/06 23:47, , 36F
10/06 23:47, 36F
→
10/06 23:48, , 37F
10/06 23:48, 37F
→
10/06 23:48, , 38F
10/06 23:48, 38F
推
10/07 05:14, , 39F
10/07 05:14, 39F
推
10/07 09:16, , 40F
10/07 09:16, 40F
→
10/07 09:16, , 41F
10/07 09:16, 41F
推
10/07 12:52, , 42F
10/07 12:52, 42F
推
10/07 13:26, , 43F
10/07 13:26, 43F
→
10/07 13:27, , 44F
10/07 13:27, 44F
→
10/07 13:28, , 45F
10/07 13:28, 45F
→
10/07 13:29, , 46F
10/07 13:29, 46F
推
10/07 15:52, , 47F
10/07 15:52, 47F
推
10/08 12:30, , 48F
10/08 12:30, 48F
推
10/08 17:23, , 49F
10/08 17:23, 49F
→
10/08 17:24, , 50F
10/08 17:24, 50F
→
10/08 17:25, , 51F
10/08 17:25, 51F
→
10/08 17:27, , 52F
10/08 17:27, 52F
推
10/08 17:32, , 53F
10/08 17:32, 53F
→
10/08 17:33, , 54F
10/08 17:33, 54F
→
10/08 17:33, , 55F
10/08 17:33, 55F
推
10/08 17:35, , 56F
10/08 17:35, 56F
→
10/08 17:36, , 57F
10/08 17:36, 57F
→
10/08 20:45, , 58F
10/08 20:45, 58F
推
10/08 23:50, , 59F
10/08 23:50, 59F
推
10/10 14:48, , 60F
10/10 14:48, 60F
推
10/10 20:20, , 61F
10/10 20:20, 61F
→
10/12 03:44, , 62F
10/12 03:44, 62F
推
10/12 16:00, , 63F
10/12 16:00, 63F
討論串 (同標題文章)