Re: [情報] Parker該拿MVP? 小跑車:不給LBJ可以給已回收
有些人很奇怪的就是相信了數據,卻不願相信真正去面對Kobe球員的感想。
這篇是迷迷說當時Kobe最強的嗎?
也不是阿,是Tony Parker。
所以Parker是迷迷嗎?
「在我的年代,Kobe是最佳球員!」Nowitzki說。
所以Dirk也是迷迷嗎?
還是這兩個球員也會沒事上一下北韓板拜仙?
這種氛圍很有趣,整篇訪問重點其實也不是Kobe,偏偏有人喜歡見獵心喜。
拿出了PER出來好像打了臉,問題是講這話的人在德州,你是在打哪國的?
還是其實德州才是仙迷總壇,北韓板只是小小支部?
對於PER以及ws/48而言,Kobe的效率值從未在頂峰這點是事實。
但球場影響力也一直不是用數據就能概括解釋。
並不想說服那些看了數據覺得Kobe is overrated的那些人,數據而言Kobe是如此沒錯。
只是提供另一個觀點,真實對上Kobe的球員的想法。
為什麼這些人不願相信數據的去認為Kobe is overrated,
卻要認為Kobe是當時or他的年代最好的球員?值得您好好思考。
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 42.76.114.226
噓
03/01 02:00, , 1F
03/01 02:00, 1F
Parker有說現在是LBJ最強阿,新聞不就寫了?
→
03/01 02:00, , 2F
03/01 02:00, 2F
推
03/01 02:01, , 3F
03/01 02:01, 3F
→
03/01 02:01, , 4F
03/01 02:01, 4F
推
03/01 02:01, , 5F
03/01 02:01, 5F
推
03/01 02:01, , 6F
03/01 02:01, 6F
→
03/01 02:01, , 7F
03/01 02:01, 7F
噓
03/01 02:02, , 8F
03/01 02:02, 8F
這不一定,看需求跟隊友。我會選我認為比較強的那位。
推
03/01 02:02, , 9F
03/01 02:02, 9F
→
03/01 02:03, , 10F
03/01 02:03, 10F
推
03/01 02:03, , 11F
03/01 02:03, 11F
→
03/01 02:03, , 12F
03/01 02:03, 12F
→
03/01 02:03, , 13F
03/01 02:03, 13F
→
03/01 02:04, , 14F
03/01 02:04, 14F
我是蠻認同不要給Kobe最後一擊的,坦白說他成名太久幾乎沒有可以輕鬆單打的機會。
並非不認同Kobe的能力,而是就現實狀況幾乎所有教練都會選擇包夾他。
如果真的有教練看數據覺得他最後一擊命中率很低不夾他那就好了。
在被包夾的情況下硬投命中率不太可能高到哪裡去。
→
03/01 02:04, , 15F
03/01 02:04, 15F
→
03/01 02:04, , 16F
03/01 02:04, 16F
噓
03/01 02:04, , 17F
03/01 02:04, 17F
→
03/01 02:04, , 18F
03/01 02:04, 18F
→
03/01 02:04, , 19F
03/01 02:04, 19F
→
03/01 02:05, , 20F
03/01 02:05, 20F
推
03/01 02:05, , 21F
03/01 02:05, 21F
→
03/01 02:05, , 22F
03/01 02:05, 22F
→
03/01 02:05, , 23F
03/01 02:05, 23F
噓
03/01 02:06, , 24F
03/01 02:06, 24F
→
03/01 02:06, , 25F
03/01 02:06, 25F
→
03/01 02:06, , 26F
03/01 02:06, 26F
推
03/01 02:06, , 27F
03/01 02:06, 27F
→
03/01 02:07, , 28F
03/01 02:07, 28F
→
03/01 02:07, , 29F
03/01 02:07, 29F
噓
03/01 02:07, , 30F
03/01 02:07, 30F
推
03/01 02:07, , 31F
03/01 02:07, 31F
→
03/01 02:08, , 32F
03/01 02:08, 32F
→
03/01 02:08, , 33F
03/01 02:08, 33F
→
03/01 02:08, , 34F
03/01 02:08, 34F
→
03/01 02:09, , 35F
03/01 02:09, 35F
→
03/01 02:09, , 36F
03/01 02:09, 36F
還有 359 則推文
還有 2 段內文
→
03/01 10:06, , 396F
03/01 10:06, 396F
推
03/01 10:07, , 397F
03/01 10:07, 397F
→
03/01 10:07, , 398F
03/01 10:07, 398F
→
03/01 10:08, , 399F
03/01 10:08, 399F
→
03/01 10:08, , 400F
03/01 10:08, 400F
推
03/01 10:08, , 401F
03/01 10:08, 401F
→
03/01 10:08, , 402F
03/01 10:08, 402F
推
03/01 10:09, , 403F
03/01 10:09, 403F
→
03/01 10:09, , 404F
03/01 10:09, 404F
→
03/01 10:09, , 405F
03/01 10:09, 405F
→
03/01 10:09, , 406F
03/01 10:09, 406F
→
03/01 10:09, , 407F
03/01 10:09, 407F
→
03/01 10:10, , 408F
03/01 10:10, 408F
→
03/01 10:12, , 409F
03/01 10:12, 409F
→
03/01 10:14, , 410F
03/01 10:14, 410F
→
03/01 10:15, , 411F
03/01 10:15, 411F
噓
03/01 10:16, , 412F
03/01 10:16, 412F
→
03/01 10:18, , 413F
03/01 10:18, 413F
推
03/01 10:23, , 414F
03/01 10:23, 414F
噓
03/01 10:40, , 415F
03/01 10:40, 415F
噓
03/01 11:11, , 416F
03/01 11:11, 416F
→
03/01 11:13, , 417F
03/01 11:13, 417F
→
03/01 11:14, , 418F
03/01 11:14, 418F
噓
03/01 12:10, , 419F
03/01 12:10, 419F
→
03/01 13:05, , 420F
03/01 13:05, 420F
→
03/01 13:08, , 421F
03/01 13:08, 421F
推
03/01 13:52, , 422F
03/01 13:52, 422F
→
03/01 14:48, , 423F
03/01 14:48, 423F
噓
03/01 16:38, , 424F
03/01 16:38, 424F
→
03/01 16:48, , 425F
03/01 16:48, 425F
→
03/01 16:49, , 426F
03/01 16:49, 426F
→
03/01 16:53, , 427F
03/01 16:53, 427F
噓
03/01 18:18, , 428F
03/01 18:18, 428F
→
03/01 18:19, , 429F
03/01 18:19, 429F
噓
03/01 19:36, , 430F
03/01 19:36, 430F
噓
03/01 19:47, , 431F
03/01 19:47, 431F
推
03/01 20:23, , 432F
03/01 20:23, 432F
噓
03/02 10:53, , 433F
03/02 10:53, 433F
推
03/03 11:05, , 434F
03/03 11:05, 434F
噓
12/12 19:32, , 435F
12/12 19:32, 435F
討論串 (同標題文章)
完整討論串 (本文為第 7 之 8 篇):