Re: [情報]蘋果官方回應A9芯片事件:測試方法誤導用戶
以常理判斷
蘋果的SoC審核條件,台積三星都有通過
表示三星製的在蘋果眼中如果是"正常"
那
台積製的其實是"超越標準的好品質"
可是台灣幾乎買不太到台積的也沒用
要換可能也換不到
請果粉們就將就點,用"正常"的iPhone6S/iPhone6S Plus吧
噢對了,如果還有下次
你覺得庫克還會選擇台積三星一起搞SoC嗎?
我覺得很會CostDown的蘋果依然選擇這樣做唷~~~
選我正解~~~
-----
Sent from JPTT on my Samsung SM-N910U (5.1.1)
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 223.138.171.118
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/MobileComm/M.1444375339.A.868.html
→
10/09 15:24, , 1F
10/09 15:24, 1F
刷一下啊XDDDD
→
10/09 15:25, , 2F
10/09 15:25, 2F
推
10/09 15:26, , 3F
10/09 15:26, 3F
→
10/09 15:27, , 4F
10/09 15:27, 4F
品質...三星也是過了蘋果那一關啊XDD
推
10/09 15:31, , 5F
10/09 15:31, 5F
→
10/09 15:32, , 6F
10/09 15:32, 6F
→
10/09 15:33, , 7F
10/09 15:33, 7F
→
10/09 15:34, , 8F
10/09 15:34, 8F
推
10/09 15:35, , 9F
10/09 15:35, 9F
推
10/09 15:36, , 10F
10/09 15:36, 10F
推
10/09 15:37, , 11F
10/09 15:37, 11F
推
10/09 15:37, , 12F
10/09 15:37, 12F
→
10/09 15:40, , 13F
10/09 15:40, 13F
→
10/09 15:42, , 14F
10/09 15:42, 14F
→
10/09 15:42, , 15F
10/09 15:42, 15F
→
10/09 15:42, , 16F
10/09 15:42, 16F
推
10/09 15:44, , 17F
10/09 15:44, 17F
→
10/09 15:44, , 18F
10/09 15:44, 18F
→
10/09 15:44, , 19F
10/09 15:44, 19F
→
10/09 15:45, , 20F
10/09 15:45, 20F
→
10/09 15:45, , 21F
10/09 15:45, 21F
→
10/09 15:45, , 22F
10/09 15:45, 22F
→
10/09 15:46, , 23F
10/09 15:46, 23F
→
10/09 15:46, , 24F
10/09 15:46, 24F
→
10/09 15:46, , 25F
10/09 15:46, 25F
→
10/09 15:46, , 26F
10/09 15:46, 26F
→
10/09 15:47, , 27F
10/09 15:47, 27F
→
10/09 15:47, , 28F
10/09 15:47, 28F
推
10/09 15:49, , 29F
10/09 15:49, 29F
推
10/09 15:50, , 30F
10/09 15:50, 30F
→
10/09 15:50, , 31F
10/09 15:50, 31F
推
10/09 15:51, , 32F
10/09 15:51, 32F
→
10/09 15:51, , 33F
10/09 15:51, 33F
推
10/09 15:53, , 34F
10/09 15:53, 34F
→
10/09 15:53, , 35F
10/09 15:53, 35F
→
10/09 15:54, , 36F
10/09 15:54, 36F
推
10/09 15:55, , 37F
10/09 15:55, 37F
→
10/09 15:55, , 38F
10/09 15:55, 38F
推
10/09 15:56, , 39F
10/09 15:56, 39F
→
10/09 15:57, , 40F
10/09 15:57, 40F
推
10/09 15:57, , 41F
10/09 15:57, 41F
→
10/09 15:59, , 42F
10/09 15:59, 42F
→
10/09 16:00, , 43F
10/09 16:00, 43F
推
10/09 16:03, , 44F
10/09 16:03, 44F

→
10/09 16:03, , 45F
10/09 16:03, 45F
→
10/09 16:03, , 46F
10/09 16:03, 46F
推
10/09 16:06, , 47F
10/09 16:06, 47F
→
10/09 16:06, , 48F
10/09 16:06, 48F
→
10/09 16:07, , 49F
10/09 16:07, 49F
→
10/09 16:07, , 50F
10/09 16:07, 50F
推
10/09 16:08, , 51F
10/09 16:08, 51F
→
10/09 16:09, , 52F
10/09 16:09, 52F
→
10/09 16:09, , 53F
10/09 16:09, 53F
噓
10/09 16:13, , 54F
10/09 16:13, 54F
推
10/09 16:17, , 55F
10/09 16:17, 55F
推
10/09 16:27, , 56F
10/09 16:27, 56F
→
10/09 16:36, , 57F
10/09 16:36, 57F
推
10/09 17:03, , 58F
10/09 17:03, 58F
→
10/09 17:45, , 59F
10/09 17:45, 59F
→
10/09 17:45, , 60F
10/09 17:45, 60F
推
10/09 17:49, , 61F
10/09 17:49, 61F
→
10/09 17:49, , 62F
10/09 17:49, 62F
反正呢...
[宗旨] 官方聲明三星製的SoC對蘋果來說沒有問題。
好了,這下你還能怎麼說呢
???
就...快點謝主隆恩吧 (叭~~叭~~叭~~)
※ 編輯: DiChik (114.39.187.11), 10/09/2015 18:41:27
→
10/09 23:41, , 63F
10/09 23:41, 63F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文:
完整討論串 (本文為第 4 之 6 篇):