[討教] 葵花寶典是不是勝過正宗易筋經(任何武功)
以笑傲江湖裡面
任我行武功差不多=修練多年易筋經的少林方證大師=(>)嵩山派左左冷禪
但是任我行+令狐沖+向問天+上官雲都打不贏東方不敗
而且東方不敗還不是拿正統兵器 只拿繡花針
所以代表 東方不敗要輕鬆幹掉方證大師是很容易
換句話講 東方不敗只練了十年葵花寶典就輕鬆幹掉修為好幾十年易筋經的方證大師
而且或許沒練到十年就可以輕鬆贏 因為後期東方不敗都只沉溺於蓮弟身上根本沒在練
再說東方不敗的葵花寶典 還不是最正統的葵花寶典
更不用說更殘缺板的辟邪劍法
辟邪劍法有多猛
武功超低微的林平之 學一年就把余滄海電的哇哇叫
岳不群學一年辟邪劍法 就把左冷禪隨便打成廢人
金庸小說裡面 常常把易筋經當作武學正統 博大精深的一個典範
但是在笑傲江湖裡面 葵花寶典展現出 練完之後 幾乎天下無敵 易筋經根本忘塵莫及
更可怕的是 練功時間不用多長 幾乎只要自宮完 沒多久就直接站上武林顛峰
在金庸小說裡面似乎沒有任何一門武功可以這麼速成的
所以 葵花寶典 是不是金庸小說中 贏過任何武功或者武功秘笈!?
PS:而且小說裡面沒有人練過最正統的葵花寶典 全都是殘缺板的。
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 36.239.197.8
※ 文章網址: http://www.ptt.cc/bbs/JinYong/M.1415243586.A.987.html
※ 編輯: wohahala (36.239.197.8), 11/06/2014 11:18:08
→
11/06 11:33, , 1F
11/06 11:33, 1F
→
11/06 11:33, , 2F
11/06 11:33, 2F
→
11/06 11:34, , 3F
11/06 11:34, 3F
→
11/06 11:34, , 4F
11/06 11:34, 4F
→
11/06 11:51, , 5F
11/06 11:51, 5F
→
11/06 11:53, , 6F
11/06 11:53, 6F
→
11/06 12:04, , 7F
11/06 12:04, 7F
→
11/06 12:05, , 8F
11/06 12:05, 8F
→
11/06 12:07, , 9F
11/06 12:07, 9F
→
11/06 12:08, , 10F
11/06 12:08, 10F
→
11/06 12:08, , 11F
11/06 12:08, 11F
→
11/06 12:09, , 12F
11/06 12:09, 12F
→
11/06 12:09, , 13F
11/06 12:09, 13F
→
11/06 12:29, , 14F
11/06 12:29, 14F
推
11/06 12:32, , 15F
11/06 12:32, 15F
推
11/06 12:45, , 16F
11/06 12:45, 16F
→
11/06 12:45, , 17F
11/06 12:45, 17F
→
11/06 12:46, , 18F
11/06 12:46, 18F
→
11/06 13:12, , 19F
11/06 13:12, 19F
→
11/06 13:14, , 20F
11/06 13:14, 20F
→
11/06 13:15, , 21F
11/06 13:15, 21F
→
11/06 13:15, , 22F
11/06 13:15, 22F
推
11/06 13:27, , 23F
11/06 13:27, 23F
→
11/06 13:30, , 24F
11/06 13:30, 24F
→
11/06 13:30, , 25F
11/06 13:30, 25F
→
11/06 13:31, , 26F
11/06 13:31, 26F
→
11/06 13:32, , 27F
11/06 13:32, 27F
→
11/06 13:32, , 28F
11/06 13:32, 28F
推
11/06 14:26, , 29F
11/06 14:26, 29F
→
11/06 16:07, , 30F
11/06 16:07, 30F
推
11/06 16:12, , 31F
11/06 16:12, 31F
→
11/06 16:12, , 32F
11/06 16:12, 32F
→
11/06 16:13, , 33F
11/06 16:13, 33F
→
11/06 16:16, , 34F
11/06 16:16, 34F
→
11/06 16:17, , 35F
11/06 16:17, 35F
→
11/06 16:18, , 36F
11/06 16:18, 36F
→
11/06 16:20, , 37F
11/06 16:20, 37F
→
11/06 16:20, , 38F
11/06 16:20, 38F
→
11/06 16:22, , 39F
11/06 16:22, 39F
還有 153 則推文
→
11/08 15:59, , 193F
11/08 15:59, 193F
推
11/08 16:08, , 194F
11/08 16:08, 194F
→
11/08 16:09, , 195F
11/08 16:09, 195F
推
11/08 21:39, , 196F
11/08 21:39, 196F
→
11/08 21:40, , 197F
11/08 21:40, 197F
推
11/08 21:46, , 198F
11/08 21:46, 198F
→
11/08 21:47, , 199F
11/08 21:47, 199F
→
11/08 21:48, , 200F
11/08 21:48, 200F
→
11/08 21:49, , 201F
11/08 21:49, 201F
→
11/08 21:50, , 202F
11/08 21:50, 202F
推
11/08 21:51, , 203F
11/08 21:51, 203F
→
11/08 21:51, , 204F
11/08 21:51, 204F
→
11/08 21:52, , 205F
11/08 21:52, 205F
→
11/08 21:53, , 206F
11/08 21:53, 206F
→
11/08 21:55, , 207F
11/08 21:55, 207F
推
11/09 00:32, , 208F
11/09 00:32, 208F
→
11/09 00:36, , 209F
11/09 00:36, 209F
→
11/09 00:37, , 210F
11/09 00:37, 210F
推
11/09 01:07, , 211F
11/09 01:07, 211F
推
11/15 07:49, , 212F
11/15 07:49, 212F
推
11/15 09:44, , 213F
11/15 09:44, 213F
→
11/15 09:44, , 214F
11/15 09:44, 214F
→
11/15 09:45, , 215F
11/15 09:45, 215F
→
11/15 09:47, , 216F
11/15 09:47, 216F
→
11/15 09:48, , 217F
11/15 09:48, 217F
→
11/15 09:48, , 218F
11/15 09:48, 218F
→
11/15 09:49, , 219F
11/15 09:49, 219F
→
11/15 09:59, , 220F
11/15 09:59, 220F
→
11/15 10:00, , 221F
11/15 10:00, 221F
→
11/15 10:01, , 222F
11/15 10:01, 222F
→
11/15 10:02, , 223F
11/15 10:02, 223F
→
11/15 10:02, , 224F
11/15 10:02, 224F
→
11/15 10:03, , 225F
11/15 10:03, 225F
→
11/15 10:04, , 226F
11/15 10:04, 226F
→
11/15 10:05, , 227F
11/15 10:05, 227F
→
11/15 10:05, , 228F
11/15 10:05, 228F
→
11/15 10:10, , 229F
11/15 10:10, 229F
→
11/15 10:11, , 230F
11/15 10:11, 230F
→
11/15 10:11, , 231F
11/15 10:11, 231F
推
12/03 21:45, , 232F
12/03 21:45, 232F
討論串 (同標題文章)
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 8 篇):