Re: [討論] 其實我不太懂「柯有負面外溢」是從哪來的消失
難得回文來回一下。
: 噓 g6m3kimo: 我看你真是 當初那場辯論開始的風向是連勝文贏了 03/10 03:42
: → g6m3kimo: 那時的情況是連勝文狂攻 柯文哲偶有反擊 連有主場優勢 03/10 03:51
: → g6m3kimo: 被你講的好像在宰神豬一樣 可見這版有效標汙染在 03/10 03:52
這...這是平行世界嗎?
當時任何人都看到柯文哲的靈光鏡反衝當場讓神豬一敗塗地了。
哪件事不提,提自己中槍時柯說自己是墨綠。
講出來已經讓人大吃一驚這人怎麼蠢到這樣,
柯文哲的回應更是讓人傻眼,這人完全不同於其他政客:
https://i.imgur.com/8EKZOAn.jpg
![](https://i.imgur.com/8EKZOAn.jpg)
而國民黨在選戰中狂打,但之後假裝沒發生的則是打「柯文哲仲介器官買賣」。
也在柯文哲於辯論會上直接出示信函之後,又一次的靈光鏡反衝。
http://www.peoplenews.tw/news/089995cc-d7fb-4e43-adbc-1549493f7e4f
在這之後所有人都相信連勝文只能吃國民黨基本盤也就是那不小於七十萬的票了。
而柯文哲能不能衝過民進黨最高紀錄六十九萬則是未定之天。
沒有所謂「辯論會連勝文贏了」這種道理,純粹是台北市歷屆選舉經驗使然。
當然結果是柯文哲突破天際,連勝文連國民黨鐵票都吃不下去。
現在就看誰要來挨柯文哲的靈光鏡反衝而已,我蠻看好姚文智被洗臉的。
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 118.168.75.194
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/HatePolitics/M.1520641140.A.A27.html
推
03/10 08:26, , 1F
03/10 08:26, 1F
→
03/10 08:27, , 2F
03/10 08:27, 2F
推
03/10 08:30, , 3F
03/10 08:30, 3F
→
03/10 08:31, , 4F
03/10 08:31, 4F
→
03/10 08:31, , 5F
03/10 08:31, 5F
→
03/10 08:31, , 6F
03/10 08:31, 6F
推
03/10 08:31, , 7F
03/10 08:31, 7F
→
03/10 08:31, , 8F
03/10 08:31, 8F
→
03/10 08:32, , 9F
03/10 08:32, 9F
→
03/10 08:32, , 10F
03/10 08:32, 10F
→
03/10 08:33, , 11F
03/10 08:33, 11F
→
03/10 08:33, , 12F
03/10 08:33, 12F
推
03/10 08:34, , 13F
03/10 08:34, 13F
→
03/10 08:39, , 14F
03/10 08:39, 14F
推
03/10 08:41, , 15F
03/10 08:41, 15F
推
03/10 08:48, , 16F
03/10 08:48, 16F
→
03/10 08:52, , 17F
03/10 08:52, 17F
→
03/10 08:52, , 18F
03/10 08:52, 18F
→
03/10 08:53, , 19F
03/10 08:53, 19F
→
03/10 08:54, , 20F
03/10 08:54, 20F
→
03/10 08:55, , 21F
03/10 08:55, 21F
→
03/10 08:55, , 22F
03/10 08:55, 22F
→
03/10 08:56, , 23F
03/10 08:56, 23F
推
03/10 08:56, , 24F
03/10 08:56, 24F
→
03/10 08:57, , 25F
03/10 08:57, 25F
→
03/10 08:57, , 26F
03/10 08:57, 26F
→
03/10 08:57, , 27F
03/10 08:57, 27F
→
03/10 08:58, , 28F
03/10 08:58, 28F
推
03/10 08:59, , 29F
03/10 08:59, 29F
→
03/10 08:59, , 30F
03/10 08:59, 30F
→
03/10 08:59, , 31F
03/10 08:59, 31F
推
03/10 09:11, , 32F
03/10 09:11, 32F
→
03/10 09:11, , 33F
03/10 09:11, 33F
→
03/10 09:11, , 34F
03/10 09:11, 34F
→
03/10 09:14, , 35F
03/10 09:14, 35F
→
03/10 09:14, , 36F
03/10 09:14, 36F
→
03/10 09:15, , 37F
03/10 09:15, 37F
→
03/10 09:15, , 38F
03/10 09:15, 38F
推
03/10 09:27, , 39F
03/10 09:27, 39F
還有 31 則推文
→
03/10 10:45, , 71F
03/10 10:45, 71F
→
03/10 10:50, , 72F
03/10 10:50, 72F
→
03/10 10:50, , 73F
03/10 10:50, 73F
→
03/10 10:51, , 74F
03/10 10:51, 74F
→
03/10 10:52, , 75F
03/10 10:52, 75F
→
03/10 10:52, , 76F
03/10 10:52, 76F
推
03/10 10:55, , 77F
03/10 10:55, 77F
→
03/10 10:55, , 78F
03/10 10:55, 78F
→
03/10 11:00, , 79F
03/10 11:00, 79F
→
03/10 11:00, , 80F
03/10 11:00, 80F
→
03/10 11:01, , 81F
03/10 11:01, 81F
推
03/10 11:01, , 82F
03/10 11:01, 82F
推
03/10 11:52, , 83F
03/10 11:52, 83F
推
03/10 12:08, , 84F
03/10 12:08, 84F
推
03/10 12:29, , 85F
03/10 12:29, 85F
→
03/10 12:35, , 86F
03/10 12:35, 86F
推
03/10 12:44, , 87F
03/10 12:44, 87F
→
03/10 12:44, , 88F
03/10 12:44, 88F
→
03/10 12:58, , 89F
03/10 12:58, 89F
那場辯論會真的讓連勝文一敗塗地到極度誇張的地步。
本來還以為只是不善言詞的富家子,結果比老爸還舉球手。
公民提問插暗樁還可以騙那些不懂的人,墨綠說跟器官買賣這個靈光鏡反衝完全無解。
....當初是柯文哲救他的耶,怎麼會拿這件事來打柯文哲,這智商太誇張。
推
03/10 13:42, , 90F
03/10 13:42, 90F
推
03/10 14:57, , 91F
03/10 14:57, 91F
推
03/10 15:01, , 92F
03/10 15:01, 92F
→
03/10 15:01, , 93F
03/10 15:01, 93F
→
03/10 15:01, , 94F
03/10 15:01, 94F
![](https://i.imgur.com/vjJCB5Z.jpg)
→
03/10 15:02, , 95F
03/10 15:02, 95F
→
03/10 15:02, , 96F
03/10 15:02, 96F
→
03/10 15:04, , 97F
03/10 15:04, 97F
→
03/10 15:05, , 98F
03/10 15:05, 98F
推
03/10 15:08, , 99F
03/10 15:08, 99F
※ 編輯: TheoEpstein (118.168.75.194), 03/10/2018 15:25:45
推
03/11 00:56, , 100F
03/11 00:56, 100F
噓
03/15 08:42, , 101F
03/15 08:42, 101F
→
03/15 08:43, , 102F
03/15 08:43, 102F
→
03/15 08:45, , 103F
03/15 08:45, 103F
噓
03/15 08:57, , 104F
03/15 08:57, 104F
→
03/15 08:58, , 105F
03/15 08:58, 105F
→
03/15 09:01, , 106F
03/15 09:01, 106F
→
03/15 09:03, , 107F
03/15 09:03, 107F
噓
03/15 09:05, , 108F
03/15 09:05, 108F
討論串 (同標題文章)
本文引述了以下文章的的內容:
完整討論串 (本文為第 21 之 22 篇):