[討論] 其實我不太懂「柯有負面外溢」是從哪來的消失
這似乎是泛綠政治人物普遍的說法,
但是每篇正規民調都告訴你柯支持度過半,
那這說法是從哪來的?
支持者的反應嗎?那都不怕是同溫層?
如果只有一篇民調那還能說他偏頗,
當第二第三篇出來之後為什麼還能說的如此堅持?
而且這還是用市話民調,把年輕人考慮進去會差更多,
他們為什麼要堅持柯有負面外溢?
-----
Sent from JPTT on my iPhone
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 1.166.189.14
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/HatePolitics/M.1520570314.A.5D1.html
推
03/09 12:40, , 1F
03/09 12:40, 1F
推
03/09 12:43, , 2F
03/09 12:43, 2F
推
03/09 12:44, , 3F
03/09 12:44, 3F
→
03/09 12:44, , 4F
03/09 12:44, 4F
推
03/09 12:46, , 5F
03/09 12:46, 5F
→
03/09 12:49, , 6F
03/09 12:49, 6F
推
03/09 12:49, , 7F
03/09 12:49, 7F
→
03/09 12:49, , 8F
03/09 12:49, 8F
→
03/09 12:51, , 9F
03/09 12:51, 9F
→
03/09 12:51, , 10F
03/09 12:51, 10F
→
03/09 12:52, , 11F
03/09 12:52, 11F
→
03/09 12:52, , 12F
03/09 12:52, 12F
→
03/09 12:53, , 13F
03/09 12:53, 13F
→
03/09 12:53, , 14F
03/09 12:53, 14F
推
03/09 12:55, , 15F
03/09 12:55, 15F
→
03/09 12:55, , 16F
03/09 12:55, 16F
→
03/09 12:56, , 17F
03/09 12:56, 17F
推
03/09 12:56, , 18F
03/09 12:56, 18F
推
03/09 12:57, , 19F
03/09 12:57, 19F
→
03/09 12:58, , 20F
03/09 12:58, 20F
→
03/09 12:59, , 21F
03/09 12:59, 21F
→
03/09 12:59, , 22F
03/09 12:59, 22F
→
03/09 12:59, , 23F
03/09 12:59, 23F
→
03/09 13:00, , 24F
03/09 13:00, 24F
推
03/09 13:01, , 25F
03/09 13:01, 25F
→
03/09 13:01, , 26F
03/09 13:01, 26F
→
03/09 13:02, , 27F
03/09 13:02, 27F
推
03/09 13:02, , 28F
03/09 13:02, 28F
→
03/09 13:02, , 29F
03/09 13:02, 29F
→
03/09 13:03, , 30F
03/09 13:03, 30F
→
03/09 13:03, , 31F
03/09 13:03, 31F
推
03/09 13:06, , 32F
03/09 13:06, 32F
→
03/09 13:06, , 33F
03/09 13:06, 33F
→
03/09 13:07, , 34F
03/09 13:07, 34F
推
03/09 13:07, , 35F
03/09 13:07, 35F
→
03/09 13:07, , 36F
03/09 13:07, 36F
→
03/09 13:08, , 37F
03/09 13:08, 37F
→
03/09 13:08, , 38F
03/09 13:08, 38F
→
03/09 13:08, , 39F
03/09 13:08, 39F
推
03/09 13:09, , 40F
03/09 13:09, 40F
→
03/09 13:09, , 41F
03/09 13:09, 41F
推
03/09 13:13, , 42F
03/09 13:13, 42F
→
03/09 13:13, , 43F
03/09 13:13, 43F
推
03/09 13:15, , 44F
03/09 13:15, 44F
→
03/09 13:15, , 45F
03/09 13:15, 45F
→
03/09 13:15, , 46F
03/09 13:15, 46F
→
03/09 13:17, , 47F
03/09 13:17, 47F
推
03/09 13:18, , 48F
03/09 13:18, 48F
推
03/09 13:22, , 49F
03/09 13:22, 49F
推
03/09 13:23, , 50F
03/09 13:23, 50F
推
03/09 13:25, , 51F
03/09 13:25, 51F
推
03/09 13:30, , 52F
03/09 13:30, 52F
→
03/09 13:30, , 53F
03/09 13:30, 53F
→
03/09 13:30, , 54F
03/09 13:30, 54F
推
03/09 13:41, , 55F
03/09 13:41, 55F
→
03/09 13:42, , 56F
03/09 13:42, 56F
→
03/09 13:42, , 57F
03/09 13:42, 57F
→
03/11 08:19, , 58F
03/11 08:19, 58F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文 (最舊先):
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 22 篇):