[新聞] 余光中病逝 王奕凱:「白色恐怖幫兇」死好消失
文學家余光中病逝 王奕凱:「白色恐怖幫兇」死好
三立/綜合報導
https://goo.gl/o22Df2
▲王奕凱在臉書發文。
台灣代表性文學家余光中於今(14)日上午逝世,享壽90歲,各界人士都感到相當不捨。
不過社運人士王奕凱卻在臉書表示「死好」,隨後又重發文解釋,他認為余光中就是白色
恐怖時期的「幫兇」,「對他一點敬意也沒有」。
王奕凱今日下午發文表示余光中「死好」,隨後又解釋,余光中推從馬英九、中國是他的
事,「但對於白色恐怖時代,他就是一個幫兇,今天他去世了,我認為有些人等不及轉型
正義就走了,也有些人等不到該被轉型的正義也先走了而已。」
余光中於1997年發表〈狼來了〉,因內容牽涉政治、經濟層面,在當時引起熱議,而王奕
凱也引用作家陳明成於2002年的點評,內容指出余光中在《聯合報》發表〈狼來了〉一文
,咬定台灣的鄉土文學就是中國大陸的「工農兵文學」,其中若干觀點與毛澤東「在延安
文藝座談會上的講話」有暗合之處。陳明成認為,〈狼來了〉發表之後,「一時之間,被
喻為『血滴子』的大帽子在文壇弄得風聲鶴唳,瀰漫著肅殺的血腥氣息。」
貼文一出,引起熱議,「不是所有的死人都值得懷念」、「他那麼想念中國的故鄉,所以
可以把他連屍帶棺種回中國嗎?這樣皆大歡喜對吧?反正他也不怎麼喜歡台灣」、「這人
在文學上有其貢獻存在…但政治上就是個盲目的幫兇」、「他對文壇的貢獻你根本沒資格
嘴」、「做人基本品德都沒有」。
也有人表示,雖然自己也很討厭余光中,但「死好」這種話對於公眾人物不太適當,勸王
奕凱趕快把文刪除,王奕凱回應,「我不刪,但我改了,我直接講我的理由,刪了,反而
更顯的虛偽,他沒有擔任何責任就走了,這已經是他的幸運,但他確實是應該要被轉型的
對象之一。」。
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 61.228.45.102
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/Gossiping/M.1513244210.A.273.html
→
12/14 17:37, , 1F
12/14 17:37, 1F
→
12/14 17:37, , 2F
12/14 17:37, 2F
推
12/14 17:38, , 3F
12/14 17:38, 3F
→
12/14 17:38, , 4F
12/14 17:38, 4F
噓
12/14 17:38, , 5F
12/14 17:38, 5F
噓
12/14 17:38, , 6F
12/14 17:38, 6F
→
12/14 17:38, , 7F
12/14 17:38, 7F
→
12/14 17:38, , 8F
12/14 17:38, 8F
→
12/14 17:39, , 9F
12/14 17:39, 9F
→
12/14 17:39, , 10F
12/14 17:39, 10F
噓
12/14 17:41, , 11F
12/14 17:41, 11F
推
12/14 17:41, , 12F
12/14 17:41, 12F
→
12/14 17:41, , 13F
12/14 17:41, 13F
噓
12/14 17:42, , 14F
12/14 17:42, 14F
推
12/14 17:42, , 15F
12/14 17:42, 15F
噓
12/14 17:42, , 16F
12/14 17:42, 16F
噓
12/14 17:44, , 17F
12/14 17:44, 17F
噓
12/14 17:44, , 18F
12/14 17:44, 18F
→
12/14 17:44, , 19F
12/14 17:44, 19F
推
12/14 17:44, , 20F
12/14 17:44, 20F
噓
12/14 17:44, , 21F
12/14 17:44, 21F
推
12/14 17:44, , 22F
12/14 17:44, 22F
→
12/14 17:45, , 23F
12/14 17:45, 23F
→
12/14 17:45, , 24F
12/14 17:45, 24F
→
12/14 17:45, , 25F
12/14 17:45, 25F
噓
12/14 17:45, , 26F
12/14 17:45, 26F
噓
12/14 17:45, , 27F
12/14 17:45, 27F
→
12/14 17:46, , 28F
12/14 17:46, 28F
噓
12/14 17:46, , 29F
12/14 17:46, 29F
噓
12/14 17:47, , 30F
12/14 17:47, 30F
→
12/14 17:47, , 31F
12/14 17:47, 31F
噓
12/14 17:47, , 32F
12/14 17:47, 32F
→
12/14 17:47, , 33F
12/14 17:47, 33F
推
12/14 17:47, , 34F
12/14 17:47, 34F
噓
12/14 17:47, , 35F
12/14 17:47, 35F
推
12/14 17:48, , 36F
12/14 17:48, 36F
→
12/14 17:48, , 37F
12/14 17:48, 37F
推
12/14 17:48, , 38F
12/14 17:48, 38F
噓
12/14 17:50, , 39F
12/14 17:50, 39F
噓
12/14 17:50, , 40F
12/14 17:50, 40F
推
12/14 17:53, , 41F
12/14 17:53, 41F
噓
12/14 17:55, , 42F
12/14 17:55, 42F
推
12/14 17:56, , 43F
12/14 17:56, 43F
推
12/14 17:58, , 44F
12/14 17:58, 44F
推
12/14 17:58, , 45F
12/14 17:58, 45F
推
12/14 17:58, , 46F
12/14 17:58, 46F
→
12/14 18:01, , 47F
12/14 18:01, 47F
噓
12/14 18:03, , 48F
12/14 18:03, 48F
推
12/14 18:03, , 49F
12/14 18:03, 49F
噓
12/14 18:07, , 50F
12/14 18:07, 50F
噓
12/14 18:09, , 51F
12/14 18:09, 51F
推
12/14 18:10, , 52F
12/14 18:10, 52F
噓
12/14 18:10, , 53F
12/14 18:10, 53F
噓
12/14 18:11, , 54F
12/14 18:11, 54F
→
12/14 18:15, , 55F
12/14 18:15, 55F
→
12/14 18:15, , 56F
12/14 18:15, 56F
→
12/14 18:15, , 57F
12/14 18:15, 57F
推
12/14 18:28, , 58F
12/14 18:28, 58F
推
12/14 18:28, , 59F
12/14 18:28, 59F
推
12/14 18:29, , 60F
12/14 18:29, 60F
推
12/14 18:31, , 61F
12/14 18:31, 61F
推
12/14 18:32, , 62F
12/14 18:32, 62F
→
12/14 18:32, , 63F
12/14 18:32, 63F
推
12/14 18:35, , 64F
12/14 18:35, 64F
噓
12/14 18:39, , 65F
12/14 18:39, 65F
推
12/14 18:40, , 66F
12/14 18:40, 66F
→
12/14 18:41, , 67F
12/14 18:41, 67F
→
12/14 18:42, , 68F
12/14 18:42, 68F
噓
12/14 18:48, , 69F
12/14 18:48, 69F
→
12/14 18:49, , 70F
12/14 18:49, 70F
噓
12/14 18:54, , 71F
12/14 18:54, 71F
推
12/14 19:00, , 72F
12/14 19:00, 72F
噓
12/14 19:02, , 73F
12/14 19:02, 73F
推
12/14 19:06, , 74F
12/14 19:06, 74F
→
12/14 19:09, , 75F
12/14 19:09, 75F
推
12/14 19:11, , 76F
12/14 19:11, 76F
噓
12/14 19:18, , 77F
12/14 19:18, 77F
推
12/14 19:34, , 78F
12/14 19:34, 78F
噓
12/14 19:52, , 79F
12/14 19:52, 79F
噓
12/14 19:55, , 80F
12/14 19:55, 80F
噓
12/14 20:13, , 81F
12/14 20:13, 81F
推
12/14 21:11, , 82F
12/14 21:11, 82F
推
12/14 21:38, , 83F
12/14 21:38, 83F
推
12/14 22:49, , 84F
12/14 22:49, 84F
噓
12/14 23:44, , 85F
12/14 23:44, 85F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文 (最舊先):
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 12 篇):