Re: [爆卦] 北院:已洩的秘密不是秘密消失
我早料到法院會判馬無罪
但至少該用合理一點的理由吧?
用馬英九說的理由也可以阿！
馬英九說 涉案層級高到國會院長
所以總統可以處理
用這個理由的話 雖然我不認同
但邏輯上至少可以接受阿
北院居然選擇用 已洩之祕非秘密
來當理由?
那法律就不存在洩密罪了！
因為洩密的同時 祕密已經消失
就已經不構成洩密
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 61.70.110.172
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/Gossiping/M.1490693810.A.DA5.html
推
03/28 17:37, , 1F
03/28 17:37, 1F
→
03/28 17:38, , 2F
03/28 17:38, 2F
→
03/28 17:38, , 3F
03/28 17:38, 3F
→
03/28 17:39, , 4F
03/28 17:39, 4F
→
03/28 17:40, , 5F
03/28 17:40, 5F
→
03/28 17:40, , 6F
03/28 17:40, 6F
推
03/28 17:42, , 7F
03/28 17:42, 7F
→
03/28 17:45, , 8F
03/28 17:45, 8F
推
03/28 17:45, , 9F
03/28 17:45, 9F
→
03/28 17:45, , 10F
03/28 17:45, 10F
推
03/28 17:46, , 11F
03/28 17:46, 11F
推
03/28 17:53, , 12F
03/28 17:53, 12F
→
03/28 17:53, , 13F
03/28 17:53, 13F
→
03/28 17:57, , 14F
03/28 17:57, 14F
推
03/28 17:58, , 15F
03/28 17:58, 15F
→
03/28 17:58, , 16F
03/28 17:58, 16F
推
03/28 17:59, , 17F
03/28 17:59, 17F
噓
03/28 18:00, , 18F
03/28 18:00, 18F
推
03/28 18:01, , 19F
03/28 18:01, 19F
→
03/28 18:02, , 20F
03/28 18:02, 20F
→
03/28 18:06, , 21F
03/28 18:06, 21F
推
03/28 18:06, , 22F
03/28 18:06, 22F
→
03/28 18:07, , 23F
03/28 18:07, 23F
推
03/28 18:10, , 24F
03/28 18:10, 24F
推
03/28 18:13, , 25F
03/28 18:13, 25F
推
03/28 18:15, , 26F
03/28 18:15, 26F
→
03/28 18:31, , 27F
03/28 18:31, 27F
推
03/28 18:35, , 28F
03/28 18:35, 28F
→
03/28 18:43, , 29F
03/28 18:43, 29F
推
03/28 18:50, , 30F
03/28 18:50, 30F
推
03/28 18:52, , 31F
03/28 18:52, 31F
討論串 (同標題文章)
完整討論串 (本文為第 15 之 22 篇)：