[討論] MS的防盜措施是否太薄弱了?
鋼彈的傳統就是機師私自出擊
或被敵人偷開走
然後艦長很幹
卻什麼都做不到
這點似乎太不考究了
備戰時讓MS待機也還罷了
但平時難道也沒任何防盜措施
讓人隨隨便便都可以開走嗎?
光是密碼鎖就能攔下一堆偷開的人吧
除了大神之外
應該沒人可以在被拖出駕駛艙前破解密碼...
布萊特一天到晚被中二病機師婊
為什麼他總是學不會教訓
叫整備班把MS看好一點啊
囧
阿斯納特吉也夠可憐了
不是被人用銲槍指著然後丟到太空
就是被小孩子綁起來
他的工作環境根本比機師還危險
--
▃▃▃▃▃▃▃▃ ◢ ◣ ◢████◣ ▃▃▃▃▃▃▃▃▃
哆啦A夢~~自動 ◣ ◢◤◤︵◤ ▄☆ ◤ ◥▌ 幹!!這個炮的用法
水龍頭不能用!! ▅ ● ● ◢◣ ⊙●⊙ ▌ ◥ 是要裝在穴上!
▅▅▅▅▅▅▅▅ ◢ "" > " ◣ ▌▅ ≡ 皿 ≡▌ ▅▅▅▅▅▅▅▅▅
◤ ◥ ~ ◤◥ ▍▏ ◥ ︶ ◢◤ ψa09374567+belleaya
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 123.192.127.149
※ 編輯: Savior09 來自: 123.192.127.149 (09/03 21:25)
推
09/03 21:32, , 1F
09/03 21:32, 1F
推
09/03 21:35, , 2F
09/03 21:35, 2F
推
09/03 21:39, , 3F
09/03 21:39, 3F
→
09/03 21:57, , 4F
09/03 21:57, 4F
→
09/03 21:58, , 5F
09/03 21:58, 5F
→
09/03 21:59, , 6F
09/03 21:59, 6F
推
09/03 21:59, , 7F
09/03 21:59, 7F
→
09/03 21:59, , 8F
09/03 21:59, 8F
→
09/03 21:59, , 9F
09/03 21:59, 9F
→
09/03 22:00, , 10F
09/03 22:00, 10F
→
09/03 22:00, , 11F
09/03 22:00, 11F
推
09/03 22:01, , 12F
09/03 22:01, 12F
→
09/03 22:02, , 13F
09/03 22:02, 13F
→
09/03 22:02, , 14F
09/03 22:02, 14F
→
09/03 22:02, , 15F
09/03 22:02, 15F
→
09/03 22:03, , 16F
09/03 22:03, 16F
→
09/03 22:04, , 17F
09/03 22:04, 17F
→
09/03 22:04, , 18F
09/03 22:04, 18F
→
09/03 22:04, , 19F
09/03 22:04, 19F
→
09/03 22:05, , 20F
09/03 22:05, 20F
→
09/03 22:06, , 21F
09/03 22:06, 21F
推
09/03 22:07, , 22F
09/03 22:07, 22F
→
09/03 22:07, , 23F
09/03 22:07, 23F
→
09/03 22:07, , 24F
09/03 22:07, 24F
→
09/03 22:08, , 25F
09/03 22:08, 25F
→
09/03 22:08, , 26F
09/03 22:08, 26F
→
09/03 22:08, , 27F
09/03 22:08, 27F
→
09/03 22:09, , 28F
09/03 22:09, 28F
→
09/03 22:09, , 29F
09/03 22:09, 29F
→
09/03 22:09, , 30F
09/03 22:09, 30F
→
09/03 22:09, , 31F
09/03 22:09, 31F
→
09/03 22:10, , 32F
09/03 22:10, 32F
推
09/03 22:14, , 33F
09/03 22:14, 33F
→
09/03 22:14, , 34F
09/03 22:14, 34F
→
09/03 22:15, , 35F
09/03 22:15, 35F
推
09/03 22:29, , 36F
09/03 22:29, 36F
推
09/03 22:33, , 37F
09/03 22:33, 37F
→
09/03 22:33, , 38F
09/03 22:33, 38F
→
09/03 22:34, , 39F
09/03 22:34, 39F
→
09/03 22:48, , 40F
09/03 22:48, 40F
→
09/03 22:49, , 41F
09/03 22:49, 41F
→
09/03 22:50, , 42F
09/03 22:50, 42F
→
09/03 22:51, , 43F
09/03 22:51, 43F
推
09/04 02:01, , 44F
09/04 02:01, 44F
→
09/04 02:01, , 45F
09/04 02:01, 45F
→
09/04 02:04, , 46F
09/04 02:04, 46F
推
09/04 03:52, , 47F
09/04 03:52, 47F
推
09/04 06:45, , 48F
09/04 06:45, 48F
→
09/04 06:45, , 49F
09/04 06:45, 49F
推
09/04 13:02, , 50F
09/04 13:02, 50F
推
09/04 14:41, , 51F
09/04 14:41, 51F
→
09/04 14:42, , 52F
09/04 14:42, 52F
推
09/04 16:35, , 53F
09/04 16:35, 53F
→
09/04 18:18, , 54F
09/04 18:18, 54F
→
09/04 18:18, , 55F
09/04 18:18, 55F
推
09/04 22:23, , 56F
09/04 22:23, 56F
推
09/06 16:22, , 57F
09/06 16:22, 57F
→
09/06 22:32, , 58F
09/06 22:32, 58F
→
09/06 22:33, , 59F
09/06 22:33, 59F
→
09/06 22:33, , 60F
09/06 22:33, 60F
→
09/06 22:34, , 61F
09/06 22:34, 61F
推
09/06 22:51, , 62F
09/06 22:51, 62F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文:
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 12 篇):