Re: [問題] Manahattan SC 範例
※ 引述《IP101 (101)》之銘言：
: 各位板大 想請問一題關於平行的範例
: Wrong: Sal applied himself in his new job, arrivied early every day,
: skipped lunch regularly, and left every night.
: Right: Sal applied himself in his new job, arriving early every day, skipping
: lunch regulary, and leaving late every night.
: 剛剛估了一下，大致上都是說，-ed結構會改變句意，不過小弟還是分不太清楚是如何
: 改變句意? 以及如何判斷說此結構會改變句意@@
這點我想和您討論一下在句尾主動分詞ving的結構, 先修正先前其他板友看法, 其實表因
果的句尾主動分詞結構邏輯主語通常是前句整件事, 範例如下：
3. (24543-!-item-!-188;#058&001465) 句尾Ving表達對前句延伸說明
Defying efforts by policymakers on both sides of the Atlantic to
restrain it, the United States dollar continued its rise, reaching
its highest level in six years against the German mark.
還原成子句: The United States dollar reached its highest level in
six years against the German mark.（請注意reach邏輯主語是主要子句主詞）
T-3-Q19. 句尾Ving表達對前句因果關係
A Swiss government panel recommended that the country sell about
half of its gold reserves, raising fears that other countries do
the same and inundate the market.
還原成子句: The fact that the country sell about half of its gold
reserves raises fears that other countries do the same and
inundate the market.（請注意raise邏輯主語是前句整件事）
以上提出的manhattan句子應該是屬於延伸說明類型,邏輯主語是前句主詞, 這樣
的句子在官方版OG有說到是作adverb phrase, 修飾前面主要子句動詞,既然修飾
動詞, 代表分詞的動作和主要子句的動作是“有關聯”, 請注意arrving, skipping
和leaving都是對apply new job之後會發生的接續事件, 但是對於平衡的句子, 也就
是錯誤那句, OG官方版解釋說這些動作是“independent”, 不會有修飾關係, 這也
就是句意上的細微差別, 也就是為何manhattan會說改變句意的原因.
--
A兔GMAT作戰中心
http://tw.myblog.yahoo.com/tootoo5478/
歡迎加入FB社團A2 GMAT掌握GMAT考試資訊
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 111.248.66.212
推
09/23 17:29, , 1F
09/23 17:29, 1F
討論串 (同標題文章)