[討論] 玩到現在爐石根本就還不需要退環境已回收
光是爐石的退還境很難說服可以避免強度通膨
通膨的現象還是存在 可以證明退還境不會影響通膨
不能否認退還境有他的必要性
就是卡牌相容性太高限制新卡開發
也只有這個問題而已
舉凡咆嘯德
每當組德魯伊必放咆嘯配自然之力 其他套牌就不用研發了
隨著牌池越大 咆嘯德組法就會越豐富
到最後演變成萬夫莫敵的牌組 其他套路不用玩了
就只有這問題
當然這問題也不需要退環境去解決
因為只要篩選出有限制發展疑慮的卡片
並限制他與擴充包搭配就可以解決
在卡牌的擴充中自然沒落
還有說什麼照顧新手根本就是騙人的
卡牌都30張組成 除非一組套牌擴充到60張才可以打
欠缺的套牌只要粉塵就能合出來
何來比較照顧新手?
單卡異能過強就只要附加限制條件就好了
大不了nerf體質
手上有 機械/原素/沒手牌/法術卡/...可以XXX
就可以限制其套牌的組成
死聲過強就是缺乏有效的反制手段望向SV的banish
我不懂把惡魔領主和聖光炸彈為什麼也要被退還境?
這決策簡直是天大笑話
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 60.250.30.118
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/C_Chat/M.1492478364.A.A58.html
推
04/18 09:20, , 1F
04/18 09:20, 1F
推
04/18 09:20, , 2F
04/18 09:20, 2F
→
04/18 09:21, , 3F
04/18 09:21, 3F
→
04/18 09:21, , 4F
04/18 09:21, 4F
推
04/18 09:21, , 5F
04/18 09:21, 5F
推
04/18 09:21, , 6F
04/18 09:21, 6F
推
04/18 09:22, , 7F
04/18 09:22, 7F
→
04/18 09:22, , 8F
04/18 09:22, 8F
→
04/18 09:22, , 9F
04/18 09:22, 9F
→
04/18 09:24, , 10F
04/18 09:24, 10F
→
04/18 09:24, , 11F
04/18 09:24, 11F
→
04/18 09:26, , 12F
04/18 09:26, 12F
→
04/18 09:26, , 13F
04/18 09:26, 13F
推
04/18 09:29, , 14F
04/18 09:29, 14F
→
04/18 09:29, , 15F
04/18 09:29, 15F
→
04/18 09:30, , 16F
04/18 09:30, 16F
→
04/18 09:30, , 17F
04/18 09:30, 17F
噓
04/18 09:31, , 18F
04/18 09:31, 18F
→
04/18 09:31, , 19F
04/18 09:31, 19F
→
04/18 09:31, , 20F
04/18 09:31, 20F
噓
04/18 09:36, , 21F
04/18 09:36, 21F
→
04/18 09:38, , 22F
04/18 09:38, 22F
→
04/18 09:38, , 23F
04/18 09:38, 23F
→
04/18 09:39, , 24F
04/18 09:39, 24F
推
04/18 09:46, , 25F
04/18 09:46, 25F
推
04/18 09:49, , 26F
04/18 09:49, 26F
推
04/18 09:51, , 27F
04/18 09:51, 27F
→
04/18 09:55, , 28F
04/18 09:55, 28F
噓
04/18 10:00, , 29F
04/18 10:00, 29F
→
04/18 10:00, , 30F
04/18 10:00, 30F
→
04/18 10:02, , 31F
04/18 10:02, 31F
→
04/18 10:02, , 32F
04/18 10:02, 32F
噓
04/18 10:02, , 33F
04/18 10:02, 33F
噓
04/18 10:03, , 34F
04/18 10:03, 34F
噓
04/18 10:03, , 35F
04/18 10:03, 35F
→
04/18 10:03, , 36F
04/18 10:03, 36F
→
04/18 10:07, , 37F
04/18 10:07, 37F
→
04/18 10:10, , 38F
04/18 10:10, 38F
→
04/18 10:10, , 39F
04/18 10:10, 39F
→
04/18 10:11, , 40F
04/18 10:11, 40F
→
04/18 10:18, , 41F
04/18 10:18, 41F
→
04/18 10:18, , 42F
04/18 10:18, 42F
→
04/18 10:19, , 43F
04/18 10:19, 43F
→
04/18 10:19, , 44F
04/18 10:19, 44F
推
04/18 10:20, , 45F
04/18 10:20, 45F
推
04/18 10:21, , 46F
04/18 10:21, 46F
推
04/18 10:52, , 47F
04/18 10:52, 47F
噓
04/18 10:58, , 48F
04/18 10:58, 48F
→
04/18 11:00, , 49F
04/18 11:00, 49F
噓
04/18 13:13, , 50F
04/18 13:13, 50F
推
04/18 13:31, , 51F
04/18 13:31, 51F
噓
04/18 14:40, , 52F
04/18 14:40, 52F
→
04/18 23:20, , 53F
04/18 23:20, 53F
推
04/19 19:13, , 54F
04/19 19:13, 54F
推
04/20 18:51, , 55F
04/20 18:51, 55F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文:
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 7 篇):