[討論] [討論] 台灣真的需要巨蛋球場嗎?消失
大家好
棒球板首po
有不同看法歡迎各位前輩提出
隨著遠雄跟北市府可能解約
而中信又有可能接手
讓棒球迷的巨蛋夢又重新燃起希望
大家無非希望在下雨天也可以觀賞球賽
也希望有個國際級球場可以舉辦國際賽
但是蓋巨蛋只是因為下雨天可以打棒球?
這效益也太低了吧
雨季的時間我們無法掌握
聯盟在排賽程時也不知道何時會下雨延賽
舉個例子
假如中信在洲際打(跟巨蛋雙主場)
但是台中下雨了台北沒下
也不可能賽前當天決定改去台北比啊
所以巨蛋的益處就是有比賽時剛好又遇到雨天
但這機率佔了全年比賽的比例應該是很低吧
雖然我也希望台灣有一天
可以有個像樣的巨蛋球場供球員及球迷使用
但是我想還是從基本的做起
提升其他球場的品質
我本身是高雄人
其實澄清湖球場好好整修其實是不錯的
不過這又回到認養球場的問題了…
義大也是因為票房不得已減半在澄清湖的場次(認養好像跟市府有問題?)
像LM的桃猿球場也是經過好幾年才有這樣的設施與環境(排水天生問題就算了…)
中信今年也對洲際砸了不少錢改善球場
雖然不到完美卻也踏出了一大步
統一的台南球真的要打掉重練了Orz
畢竟離蓋巨蛋應該還要好幾年的時間
好好提升球場品質
才是當務之急的吧!
-----
Sent from JPTT on my Sony C6602.
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 1.175.57.4
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/Baseball/M.1460649724.A.9E4.html
推
04/15 00:02, , 1F
04/15 00:02, 1F
→
04/15 00:03, , 2F
04/15 00:03, 2F
推
04/15 00:03, , 3F
04/15 00:03, 3F
噓
04/15 00:03, , 4F
04/15 00:03, 4F
噓
04/15 00:04, , 5F
04/15 00:04, 5F
→
04/15 00:04, , 6F
04/15 00:04, 6F
→
04/15 00:04, , 7F
04/15 00:04, 7F
推
04/15 00:05, , 8F
04/15 00:05, 8F
推
04/15 00:05, , 9F
04/15 00:05, 9F
→
04/15 00:05, , 10F
04/15 00:05, 10F
→
04/15 00:05, , 11F
04/15 00:05, 11F
→
04/15 00:06, , 12F
04/15 00:06, 12F
推
04/15 00:07, , 13F
04/15 00:07, 13F
→
04/15 00:07, , 14F
04/15 00:07, 14F
推
04/15 00:07, , 15F
04/15 00:07, 15F
推
04/15 00:08, , 16F
04/15 00:08, 16F
→
04/15 00:08, , 17F
04/15 00:08, 17F
推
04/15 00:08, , 18F
04/15 00:08, 18F
→
04/15 00:08, , 19F
04/15 00:08, 19F
推
04/15 00:09, , 20F
04/15 00:09, 20F
→
04/15 00:10, , 21F
04/15 00:10, 21F
推
04/15 00:11, , 22F
04/15 00:11, 22F
→
04/15 00:11, , 23F
04/15 00:11, 23F
推
04/15 00:11, , 24F
04/15 00:11, 24F
推
04/15 00:11, , 25F
04/15 00:11, 25F
→
04/15 00:11, , 26F
04/15 00:11, 26F
推
04/15 00:12, , 27F
04/15 00:12, 27F
→
04/15 00:12, , 28F
04/15 00:12, 28F
推
04/15 00:12, , 29F
04/15 00:12, 29F
推
04/15 00:13, , 30F
04/15 00:13, 30F
推
04/15 00:13, , 31F
04/15 00:13, 31F
推
04/15 00:13, , 32F
04/15 00:13, 32F
→
04/15 00:13, , 33F
04/15 00:13, 33F
推
04/15 00:14, , 34F
04/15 00:14, 34F
→
04/15 00:15, , 35F
04/15 00:15, 35F
推
04/15 00:15, , 36F
04/15 00:15, 36F
→
04/15 00:15, , 37F
04/15 00:15, 37F
→
04/15 00:15, , 38F
04/15 00:15, 38F
噓
04/15 00:15, , 39F
04/15 00:15, 39F
還有 69 則推文
→
04/15 01:28, , 109F
04/15 01:28, 109F
→
04/15 01:34, , 110F
04/15 01:34, 110F
→
04/15 01:34, , 111F
04/15 01:34, 111F
→
04/15 01:41, , 112F
04/15 01:41, 112F
→
04/15 01:41, , 113F
04/15 01:41, 113F
推
04/15 01:43, , 114F
04/15 01:43, 114F
推
04/15 01:52, , 115F
04/15 01:52, 115F
→
04/15 01:52, , 116F
04/15 01:52, 116F
噓
04/15 02:00, , 117F
04/15 02:00, 117F
→
04/15 02:00, , 118F
04/15 02:00, 118F
→
04/15 02:05, , 119F
04/15 02:05, 119F
→
04/15 02:05, , 120F
04/15 02:05, 120F
推
04/15 02:17, , 121F
04/15 02:17, 121F
推
04/15 02:26, , 122F
04/15 02:26, 122F
推
04/15 02:28, , 123F
04/15 02:28, 123F
推
04/15 02:44, , 124F
04/15 02:44, 124F
→
04/15 02:44, , 125F
04/15 02:44, 125F
→
04/15 03:37, , 126F
04/15 03:37, 126F
→
04/15 03:44, , 127F
04/15 03:44, 127F
推
04/15 04:28, , 128F
04/15 04:28, 128F
→
04/15 06:30, , 129F
04/15 06:30, 129F
噓
04/15 06:33, , 130F
04/15 06:33, 130F
噓
04/15 06:59, , 131F
04/15 06:59, 131F
推
04/15 07:48, , 132F
04/15 07:48, 132F
推
04/15 09:04, , 133F
04/15 09:04, 133F
→
04/15 09:48, , 134F
04/15 09:48, 134F
推
04/15 10:13, , 135F
04/15 10:13, 135F
→
04/15 10:13, , 136F
04/15 10:13, 136F
推
04/15 10:19, , 137F
04/15 10:19, 137F
→
04/15 10:19, , 138F
04/15 10:19, 138F
噓
04/15 10:37, , 139F
04/15 10:37, 139F
→
04/15 10:38, , 140F
04/15 10:38, 140F
→
04/15 10:38, , 141F
04/15 10:38, 141F
→
04/15 10:39, , 142F
04/15 10:39, 142F
噓
04/15 10:46, , 143F
04/15 10:46, 143F
推
04/15 12:13, , 144F
04/15 12:13, 144F
推
04/15 18:33, , 145F
04/15 18:33, 145F
噓
04/16 08:01, , 146F
04/16 08:01, 146F
噓
04/16 12:14, , 147F
04/16 12:14, 147F
噓
04/16 14:24, , 148F
04/16 14:24, 148F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文 (最舊先):
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 7 篇):