作者查詢 / yw1002
作者 yw1002 在 PTT [ Eng-Class ] 看板的留言(推文), 共293則
限定看板:Eng-Class
看板排序:
全部Gossiping37524Physics2996NY-Yankees1597HatePolitics1426NBA1325ToS875MLB616movie412Math335Eng-Class293Poker248Beauty237Chemistry77Anchors59Tech_Job52TOEIC45joke27L_TalkandCha25home-sale21Electronics19Teacher19gallantry15Acad-Affairs14PublicIssue12specialman12ScienceNote10AfterPhD9EngTalk8BigSanchung7Chiayi7PublicServan7Salary7YOLO7DummyHistory6MuscleBeach6NTU6BaseballXXXX5Raptors5Baseball4Horror4SENIORHIGH4speech4Test4C_Chat3dog3EAseries3historia3medstudent3MenTalk3MMA3PhD3Stock3UTAH-JAZZ3WomenTalk3ask2Astros2car2CCK-GENERAL2cksh78th152CTU-242Cubs2FITNESS2JinYong2Marginalman2SuperBike2TaichungBun2Tainan2translator2Wen-Shan2WorldCup2About_Life1Aviation1baking1BLAZERS1BoardCourt1book1CareerPlan1Cavaliers1CCK-FREE1China-Drama1ClassicRock1Cloud1DivingSport1e-shopping1Examination1Finance1Football1GossipPicket1graduate1HK-movie1I-Lan1Ichiro1JetLi1Kaohsiung1Keelung1KOTDFansClub1Mavericks1Militarylife1Olympics_ISG1Road_Running1RockMetal1sex1SFGiants1SlamDunk1SMSlife1Translation1TSU1TW-history1YUYUHAKUSHO1<< 收起看板(109)
4F→:還是要查字典。有時候是要強調那個行為動作所以用Ving03/14 08:49
6F→:有點雙關阿....Right here? Right now?03/14 08:15
12F→:03/15 00:26
13F推:不一定有雙關....我說的:D03/15 00:29
1F推:全文?03/14 08:28
1F推:最近在看The Great Gatsby還蠻喜歡Fitzgerald03/14 01:00
4F→:我覺得要讀小說最好針對同一個作家。因為讀同一個人的文章03/14 01:21
5F→:多了就會熟悉風格便於模仿學習03/14 01:21
1F推:on是代表"持續"的意思03/14 00:06
2F→:up意思我不太清楚,不知道是因為循著上游(upstream)還怎樣03/14 00:07
3F→:through the borough表示經營範圍達整個borough03/14 00:08
4F推:其實up省略意思也還可以看出來03/14 00:11
5F→:也可能跟前面down有關03/14 00:11
8F推:有沒有可能down near the harbor是指位置地點03/14 06:35
3F→:先看of:想像一個大圈圈整個是emergency equipment,這個03/14 08:12
4F→:圈圈裡頭包含emergency equipment各種組成;可能是資訊、03/14 08:13
5F→:成分....有形無形的等等。information只是其中一環03/14 08:13
6F推:不管是of或for,都是兩個名詞沒有修飾界定作用03/14 08:23
7F→:除非你說using information of....那就是使用上的資訊03/14 08:23
8F→:如果是manufacturing info就是製造資訊03/14 08:24
1F推:do (exercises in) the workbook03/13 18:51
1F推:出處?03/13 17:15
2F推:03/13 16:24
2F推:你這句子有fallacy03/13 23:57
3F→:如果你知道compared to其實前面省略了"when"03/13 23:57
4F→:所以你這句會讓人誤會成"當你被比較時,你才....."03/13 23:58
5F→:你的邏輯上應該是「當被比較時,你的"貢獻"微不足道」03/13 23:58
8F推:原po的句子翻成中文意思就是「當我被拿去作比較時,我啥03/14 01:07
9F→:都沒作」類似的意思。這不是很奇怪嗎?原來要表達的意思應03/14 01:08
10F→:該是對社會的貢獻(difference in contribution)03/14 01:09
11F推:Compared to contribution from people who devote their03/14 01:14
12F→:time to environmental protection, that from me seems03/14 01:14
13F→:trivial who never even pay attention to concerned issue03/14 01:15
14F→:such as global warming.03/14 01:15
15F→:我的句子是不是比較清楚?被比較的應該是那個貢獻03/14 01:15
16F推:我想問題是主要子句的主詞。原po在main clause的主詞用03/14 01:19
17F→:I myself,這樣變成重點是在這個人本身。如果要改寫應該03/14 01:19
18F→:the attention paid by me to.......is far from enough03/14 01:20
22F推:也可能跟parallelism有關。原po在從屬子句主詞用的是人03/14 01:24
23F→:主要子句主詞用的也是人,表面看來符合parallelism03/14 01:25
25F→:但是這個前提本來就有問題。比較的應該是事--對事不對人03/14 01:25
27F→:如果真的要比較人本身,我建議可以說I feel humbled by...03/14 01:26
28F→:因為當你把主詞用人取代事物,那就代表你想比的是人本身03/14 01:27
29F→:例如道德標準比較高或低等等03/14 01:27
30F→:Compared to people who devote..., I feel ashamed of03/14 01:29
31F→:my own inaction.....03/14 01:29
32F推:大概沒啥人懂我的意思....就到此為止了03/14 01:32
33F推:我想到了。是在主要子句那裡。主要子句是個結論03/14 01:58
34F→:如果"I myself have never paid enough attention.."是個03/14 01:58
35F→:事實,那就根本不需要經過比較。主要子句應該說I find that03/14 01:59
37F推:原句唸起來好像很順沒錯,但是其實是有問題的03/14 06:33
42F推:那也許你應該用while句型03/14 08:38
44F推:compared to跟while最大區別在前者接名詞後者可以接子句03/14 08:48
52F推:原來是博士,請原諒我的無理。請刪掉我的推文謝謝!03/14 09:36
54F→:我只是提供參考。不認同那就算了03/14 09:39
56F→:總之compared to的to是介詞後面只能放phrase03/14 09:40
58F→:while卻是可以放clause03/14 09:40
59F推:懶得說了,去問一下專業英寫老師看我說的有沒有道理03/14 09:43
60F→:然後記得提醒小朋友演講要輔助手式吸引聽眾注意03/14 09:44