作者查詢 / visorkk
作者 visorkk 在 PTT 全部看板的留言(推文), 共18589則
限定看板:全部
看板排序:
全部JinYong3773ask-why2530Buddhism2171MartialArts2017Christianity2011soul1433Learn_Buddha1007gallantry629haiku274Taoism257Cross_Life219TW-language213Feminism182Buddha115Warfare111meditation99Redology95poem94Atheism86CultureShock79TW-history72CATCH58Ancient51QueerHabit50Brethren44LAW44TransLaw44Supernatural39NCHUS35marvel34Gossiping33Confucianism32jawawa32kendo32WarringState32Catholic24DummyHistory24HK-movie21Nethood21Psychiatry21MuscleBeach19Military18feminine_sex17PushDoll17HumService14study14HKMCantonese13CHING12MMA12Monotheism12SENIORHIGH12Chinese11DPP10MJ10Violation9KMT8NewAge7SurvivalGame7Baki6Beauty6JapanHistory6paranormal6pighead6PublicIssue6Boxing5KNU5CCRomance4Chi-Gong4Ecophilia4FLAT_CLUB4Hate4ISUEE93A4NCCU_PubLaw4PttNewhand4StupidClown4ck51st3283Coffee3emprisenovel3HatePolitics3KS98-3023Mabinogi3riddle3WomenTalk3WriteService3asciiart2CTime2CYCU_MIS_93B2Drama-Ticket2FJU2Fund2Geography2GossipPicket2GTA2JamesWen2KARATE2Keelung2MCU_Talk2MdnCNhistory2Militarylife2NCHU-VM982NetRumor2NEW_ROC2OIT_main2RockMetal2specialman2TFSHS66th3072TKU_EW94B2youth_ddm2ASHS-93-li1BigPeitou1BigShiLin1Cga1China1ck62nd3141criminology1CrossStrait1CT24th3371CTS1Evangelion1FJU-ACC90a1FJU-ACC91a1GuideDog1gymnastics1HarryPotter1Hiking1image1JOJO1joke1kawaii1kochikame1Koei1KOTDFansClub1KOU1KS97-3101KS97-3201Language1LCD1Lineage1movie1NCCU1NCCU05_GIDS1NCCU07_PHILO1NCCU08_MAENG1NCCU_KungFu1NCHU-MKT991NCU97ME-B1NCU_MATH861NDHU-His1031NewYork1NFU1ntnuch95c1NTOU-AQUA981NTOU-EBFS931NTPU-STAT951NTU_stamp1NTUE-CS1021NTUEE_Lab2071NUU_CHE1PaintBall1Paradox1PCSH91_3051Post1PresidentLi1Ptt-Charity1SCU_Talk1Self-Healing1StraightMH1TaiwanDrama1TFSHS64th3091TigerBlue1TKU_EE_92C1Tobacco1TPC_Police1TryingTimes1TTU-AFL1VET1Wanhua1wearefriends1WuLing46-3171YP97-3131<< 收起看板(180)
4F推:長知識02/06 02:28
3F→:精闢01/26 11:23
1F推:好名字01/24 12:26
1F推:你的立論是 先相信>才能證明>才能看見01/24 12:36
2F→:那最後怎麼跑來攻擊 只相信不證明這塊呢?01/24 12:36
3F→:而且對方的反論是 未必要相信就可以證明吧?01/24 12:37
4F→:證明這件事的動機可能是相信可能是不信也可能是存疑01/24 12:38
5F→:我無法理解的是 這件事(證明的行動)的動機你是如何釘死在01/24 12:38
6F→:"相信"這部分上的?01/24 12:39
11F推:有了 感謝回覆01/26 11:02
10F→:^^01/24 08:54
14F推:新年快樂喔01/24 10:38
15F→:剛回國01/24 10:39
18F推:陪老人家過年啦01/24 11:44
20F→:沒阿 只是陪阿公阿嬤去國外過個年 輕鬆一下而已01/24 12:41
21F→:我離有錢人還很遙遠~~01/24 12:41
11F推:新年快樂 祝大家六時都吉祥 善願皆成辦!01/24 08:54
9F推:看需求 古代歐洲學者也提出過一個國家至少要有兩千萬人口01/24 12:32
10F→:才有機會成為強國 當人少的時候對人多有期待 當然多的時候01/24 12:33
11F→:又對於人口過剩有擔憂(如對岸的一胎化政策)01/24 12:33
4F→:好文推114.44.14.240 01/20 21:47
1F推:你怎麼不引前半部?01/20 21:16
2F→:慣例是 具結保證沒賣鴉片 才可以進來貿易 這是行政准駁01/20 21:16
3F→:權限 你只引後半部 讓人誤會這是刑事處罰範圍權限01/20 21:17
4F→:這跟後來的 結文如賣鴉片 願受清朝刑律制裁怎可謂相同01/20 21:18
5F→:有偷換概念之嫌01/20 21:19
9F→:你的回應不是又承認一次需要具保自願坐罪才能用...01/26 11:04
11F推:ok 承認混淆了02/03 16:20
12F→:那你搞清楚行政跟刑事的差別後02/03 16:20
13F→:請舉證未具保到鴉片即可直接審判的案例02/03 16:21
14F→:你所言並無證據支撐 或是用混淆的錯誤證據所支持的02/03 16:23