作者查詢 / eslite12
作者 eslite12 在 PTT [ MRT ] 看板的留言(推文), 共139則
限定看板:MRT
看板排序:
全部Railway948media-chaos652Geography526Military470Datong315Gossiping245historia214TW-history195pighead189IA178Taipei177GreenParty175MRT139WorldCup136Road135Urban_Plan133Aviation114UEFA109Ecophilia103NTPU-LCLS9195Germany89Deutsch84a-diane80BigShiLin76TSU67PingTung58TW-language45AdvEduUK43LegalTheory36Bundesliga35NEW_ROC35China26clmusic26politics25THU_BA200025Chelsea22BigPeitou20KMT19Shu-Lin19ShuangHe19SongShan19Wanhua15Zhongshan15PCSH91_30514movie13NTUniNews13PresidentLi13HsinYi11Russian11FAPL9Daan8specialman8CultureShock7Language7NCCU_SEED7Violation7FuMouDiscuss6Marxism6B97A013XX5DPP5FengYuan5HatePolitics5MdnCNhistory5AT_Badminton4Hanson-Wu4NDHU-phy954NTPUyouthCOM4Policy4PublicIssue4Singapore4travel4Belgium3CampusTour3Cross_Life3dlsh-7th-3033East_Europe3FJU-ACCR943KS98-3013Map-Guide3NCHU_CsHsnu3NOCHIGH3NTHU-MSE103PttHistory3SENIORHIGH3YLclub3Ancient2Architecture2basketballTW2Bus2EuropeTravel2FCU-ELEC-92A2FLAT_CLUB2gallantry2Inter2Keelung2KOTDFansClub2L_LifeInfo2London2NDMC-F82PoliticLaw2PublicAffair2R89325xxx2railtour2SHU-MIS982Taiwan3192WeiLi-geo2Wikipedia2WuLing46-3172Zhongzheng2AboutBoards1Africa1Anchors1AppleDaily1Arch-model1ask-why1B90A012XX1B90A013XX1BigSanchung1Catholic1Chan_Mou1Christianity1ck55th3271ck56th3231cksh78th031CTSH923011Disabled1DummyHistory1Economics1Education1eslite1FFF1FHSH-89-3161FJU_ADY2K1FJU_OT1st1France1GameDesign1GIEE_991global_univ1GossipPicket1HCHS593051HLHS5thU1Holland1HolySee1home-sale1HsinChuang1HSNU_8201HSNU_9361HSNU_9571KOU1KS93-3041LAW1LawBasketbal1Militarylife1NCCU05_SOCIO1NCCU_CriLaw1NCKU_CSIE931NDMC-M1051NTHUTL961NTNUMasCom961NTU_BOTDorm1NTUcontinent1NtuDormM11NtuDormM31NTUDormM71NtuDormM81NTUEE_BL5271NTUHI1NTUND901NTUST_Talk1NUK_AC981R99A41XXX1RSSH87_3031scu_transfer1SHU_LawGrad1Sportcenter1SSSH-16th3091SYSOP1T-I-R1TA_AN1TAHR1Tainan1TaitungH92-11tale1TamShui1WorkinChina1YCSH_alumni1<< 收起看板(186)
19F推: BMTC案的設定在當時看是沒有問題的,只是信義計劃及南04/22 13:09
20F→: 港的開發條件會相應不同。04/22 13:09
77F推: 高架BRT全生命周期的成本效益很差01/03 14:11
19F推:慕尼黑沒有"捷運局"12/18 22:42
20F推:不是耶 MVV不是營運者 是一個公法人團體12/18 23:14
21F→:所以不是"局" 也不是"公司"12/18 23:14
22F→:要說起來比較接近悠遊卡公司 但不是一間公司12/18 23:15
1F→:看到你這樣定義"古代"你的歷史老師應該會哭死06/02 00:16
2F→:如果 你真的有稍微唸過歷史的話06/02 00:16
1F噓:那你想怎樣?04/19 22:56
3F→:所以內湖人天天去日本嗎?02/19 23:37
13F噓:噓一樓02/14 21:54
23F推:根本的原因是 那些以為講國語了不起的家裡是來台北幾年啊02/14 22:00
24F→:英文才是大部分都不需要 大部分的英文站名根本沒意義02/14 22:00
26F→:而且像台北跟高雄捷運"貼心"的程度 根本就是第三世界國家02/14 22:01
28F→:瘋狂想跟世界接軌的次殖民地心態的產物02/14 22:01
41F推:加地夫又沒地鐵02/14 22:34
93F噓:科科科科科12/29 22:40
1F噓:你又知道人家沒討論了?12/04 11:31
2F→:只會躲在批踢踢上鬼叫才真的廢到不行12/04 11:32
3F噓:我從04開始參加反北纜的運動 議員看很多 倒沒聽過你這號12/04 11:58
4F→:人物 想來你應該是無影無形 或者是在工務局的臥底12/04 11:58
5F噓:隨便你12/05 00:22
1F推:中山國小以前是有名的貴族學校 當然有名06/07 14:04
6F噓:如果你只聽你想聽的 應該開個人版06/07 14:30