作者查詢 / eslite12
作者 eslite12 在 PTT [ Ecophilia ] 看板的留言(推文), 共103則
限定看板:Ecophilia
看板排序:
全部Railway923media-chaos652Geography526Military469Datong315Gossiping245historia214TW-history195pighead189IA178Taipei177GreenParty175MRT136WorldCup136Road135Urban_Plan133UEFA109Aviation104Ecophilia103NTPU-LCLS9195Germany89Deutsch84a-diane80BigShiLin76TSU67PingTung58TW-language45AdvEduUK43LegalTheory36Bundesliga35NEW_ROC35China26clmusic26politics25THU_BA200025Chelsea22BigPeitou20KMT19Shu-Lin19ShuangHe19SongShan19Wanhua15Zhongshan15PCSH91_30514movie13NTUniNews13PresidentLi13HsinYi11Russian11FAPL9Daan8specialman8CultureShock7Language7NCCU_SEED7Violation7FuMouDiscuss6Marxism6B97A013XX5DPP5FengYuan5HatePolitics5MdnCNhistory5AT_Badminton4Hanson-Wu4NDHU-phy954NTPUyouthCOM4Policy4PublicIssue4Singapore4travel4Belgium3CampusTour3Cross_Life3dlsh-7th-3033East_Europe3FJU-ACCR943KS98-3013Map-Guide3NCHU_CsHsnu3NOCHIGH3NTHU-MSE103PttHistory3SENIORHIGH3YLclub3Ancient2Architecture2basketballTW2Bus2EuropeTravel2FCU-ELEC-92A2FLAT_CLUB2gallantry2Inter2Keelung2KOTDFansClub2L_LifeInfo2London2NDMC-F82PoliticLaw2PublicAffair2R89325xxx2railtour2SHU-MIS982Taiwan3192WeiLi-geo2Wikipedia2WuLing46-3172Zhongzheng2AboutBoards1Africa1Anchors1AppleDaily1Arch-model1ask-why1B90A012XX1B90A013XX1BigSanchung1Catholic1Chan_Mou1Christianity1ck55th3271ck56th3231cksh78th031CTSH923011Disabled1DummyHistory1Economics1Education1eslite1FFF1FHSH-89-3161FJU_ADY2K1FJU_OT1st1France1GameDesign1GIEE_991global_univ1GossipPicket1HCHS593051HLHS5thU1Holland1HolySee1home-sale1HsinChuang1HSNU_8201HSNU_9361HSNU_9571KOU1KS93-3041LAW1LawBasketbal1Militarylife1NCCU05_SOCIO1NCCU_CriLaw1NCKU_CSIE931NDMC-M1051NTHUTL961NTNUMasCom961NTU_BOTDorm1NTUcontinent1NtuDormM11NtuDormM31NTUDormM71NtuDormM81NTUEE_BL5271NTUHI1NTUND901NTUST_Talk1NUK_AC981R99A41XXX1RSSH87_3031scu_transfer1SHU_LawGrad1Sportcenter1SSSH-16th3091SYSOP1T-I-R1TA_AN1TAHR1Tainan1TaitungH92-11tale1TamShui1WorkinChina1YCSH_alumni1<< 收起看板(186)
3F→:水電費調漲又不是為了反應成本 如果不是自由市場講這些04/05 16:05
4F→:都意義有限04/05 16:05
17F→:漲價只是為了繳給台電養無意義的備用容量跟人事費用 這種04/13 23:18
18F→:事情還想討拍拍也蠻離奇04/13 23:18
3F噓:噓一下原來的推文02/10 22:46
1F推:10/15 21:03
3F噓:所以台鐵具備系統整合的能力? 那快去諾曼地賺外匯拼經濟09/07 22:04
3F→:用一座新的拼裝電廠換兩座老電廠叫值得?09/06 23:08
4F→:擁核者一直都不敢面對的是 在俄羅斯以外的已開發國家09/06 23:09
5F→:新一代核電廠工程全部延宕超支09/06 23:09
6F→:世界上真的有"能力"(音:勇氣)蓋好核電廠的 只剩以中華人09/06 23:10
7F→:民共和國為首的第三世界國家09/06 23:10
16F→:中國經濟叫"好"? 那安哥拉叫什麼? 天堂嗎?09/11 23:23
2F噓:國際技術尚未完全成熟Zzz07/23 15:54
1F→:你的3寫的也太簡略的07/21 23:25
1F→:根本是在鼓勵摧毀都市記憶07/07 18:55
1F推:純從交通角度 只要北市這側不配合 我很懷疑這樣搞的用處?06/24 02:07
4F推:北市這邊不配合做引道蓋這條路是有什麼用? 科科06/24 23:40
1F→:核能擴展法案應該是誤譯 而且不應該加引號06/24 02:09