作者查詢 / env
作者 env 在 PTT [ LAW ] 看板的留言(推文), 共132則
限定看板:LAW
看板排序:
全部GUNDAM629model347LAW132Lawyer119TypeMoon90GatoShoji77SchoolRumble65Examination59Gossiping52FATE_GO37e-seller36FLAT_CLUB36Haruhi36FBG35CATCH34LeafKey33SRW33FSS29WindFantasy29media-chaos24CODE_GEASS23FuMouDiscuss20Nintendo20PC_Shopping17PttLifeLaw16BigSanchung14movie14C_Chat13mobilesales13NCCU13C_Question12China-Drama12Gintama12HardwareSale12cat11H-GAME11Modchip11P2PSoftWare10Broad_Band9FJU9nb-shopping9LUNA8NSwitch8RTS7ShowOff6ArakawaCow5Azumanga5Hayate5IA5LightNovel5MONSTER5Stephen5StupidClown5chatskill4Ecophilia4hardware4Macross4MobileComm4Shana4TigerBlue4AiYazawa3D_Fin_Law_923joke3KS94-3093Network3ONE_PIECE3PttLaw3swim3Zhongshan3AC_In2ANIMAX2army_58-1T2BBSmovie2Chan_Mou2CSMU-AFL2Expansion072FJU-EE-2005A2KS95-3112Kusan_89-3122LCD2LegalTheory2LTK2MCU-LAW2MRT2NDMC-D612NKUTEE2Notebook2TKU_trans2Ancient1Android1ask1CD-R1Chinese-B871ck58th3021CPU_7711CPU_PA7311Cross_Life1CSMU-Band1CSMU-MED931CSMU-N951CYCU_MIS_93A1CYUT1DistantLove1esahc1Evangelion1FJU-ACC90a1FJU-ACC91a1FJU-ACCR941FJU-EE-2005B1FJU_AD-011FJU_AD-031FJU_Chiayun1FJU_CLASS1FJU_OT2nd1FJU_PSY0941Gamesale1Gash1Ghost-Shell1God_Drop1graduate1Hate1Henin1HLHS_10thU1HoneyClover1HSNU_10051HSNU_9771Hunter1ID_Problem1kachaball1KS94-3071KS94-3201KS97-3181L_RelaxEnjoy1MacShop1marriage1marvel1Militarylife1money1Nanoha1NCCU_BM1NCCU_Info1NCHU-AGR981NDS1NKNU_Eng92B1NTHU-MSE091NTHU_STAT941ntnuHE951NTOU_MMD93A1NTPU-ACC871NTPU-STAT931NTUE_Nse961NTUEP1NTUGIEE_AMTG1NTUST-EE-B911NTUT_EE490A1PingTung1PushDoll1RO1Rozen_Maiden1RSSH91_3011RSSH92_3051SCU_ACC_96A1SK_SD_PL1SMHS91_3061SSSH-13th3141SuperHeroes1TaiwanDrama1TFSHS65th3151THUIM-5th1TMU-K2X1toberich1TTU-talk1TunHua05t3111TYSH48-3011USC1Viator94Ding1VideoCard1Wanhua1welcome_NHK1Yanzi1YLclub1<< 收起看板(181)
6F推:直接去跟檢察官告發就好啦~不過你很確定嗎?08/18 17:22
1F→:王老師新的民總有大略介紹~成年監護跟成年輔助~可以去翻一翻06/03 22:19
2F→:記得大約只有15頁左右~06/03 22:20
9F→:刑法傷害罪?沒劇情不清楚~05/25 08:51
1F→:以性別來做區別標準~應採取何種審查密度?05/22 21:02
6F推:那就上訴阿...法律又不是不給你救濟..來這邊寫有用?05/12 19:55
3F推:就是馬總統常說的依法行政~謝謝05/07 23:25
1F推:有可能成立傷害罪跟教唆傷害..(有打針之類的話)04/22 21:23
3F推:抱歉沒經過大腦就出來了04/22 22:11
1F推:引用300條的標準不是罪名嗎?只要罪名不同就得引用~04/09 21:06
4F推:傷重致死不是加重結果犯!?04/09 18:47
7F→:你的意思是說~這時候原本是起訴:過失傷害→審理:過失致死這樣?04/09 20:56
8F→:依然是同一目的與侵害性事實~是為事實同一~但罪名不同應引30004/09 20:58
9F→:變更後裁判04/09 20:59
1F推:第一題公式思考錯誤~既判力=實體確定力~不會再免訴判決上產生04/07 07:44
3F→:阿~打錯~04/07 07:45
4F推:你的第一公式怪怪的~無起訴不可分~卻又不得就未起訴部分審判?04/07 08:00
5F→:要有起訴不可分~才會產生實體上的確定力吧?才會被既判力所及04/07 08:02
6F→:而且是當一罪=一訴~並且有罪與有罪不可分時=單一案件04/07 08:06
7F→:照你所說的接續犯那邊~是無罪與有罪~自然不生單一案件問題04/07 08:11