作者查詢 / env
作者 env 在 PTT [ FuMouDiscuss ] 看板的留言(推文), 共20則
限定看板:FuMouDiscuss
看板排序:
全部GUNDAM629model347LAW132Lawyer119TypeMoon90GatoShoji77SchoolRumble65Examination59Gossiping52FATE_GO37e-seller36FLAT_CLUB36Haruhi36FBG35CATCH34LeafKey33SRW33FSS29WindFantasy29media-chaos24CODE_GEASS23FuMouDiscuss20Nintendo20PC_Shopping17PttLifeLaw16BigSanchung14movie14C_Chat13mobilesales13NCCU13C_Question12China-Drama12Gintama12HardwareSale12cat11H-GAME11Modchip11P2PSoftWare10Broad_Band9FJU9nb-shopping9LUNA8NSwitch8RTS7ShowOff6ArakawaCow5Azumanga5Hayate5IA5LightNovel5MONSTER5Stephen5StupidClown5chatskill4Ecophilia4hardware4Macross4MobileComm4Shana4TigerBlue4AiYazawa3D_Fin_Law_923joke3KS94-3093Network3ONE_PIECE3PttLaw3swim3Zhongshan3AC_In2ANIMAX2army_58-1T2BBSmovie2Chan_Mou2CSMU-AFL2Expansion072FJU-EE-2005A2KS95-3112Kusan_89-3122LCD2LegalTheory2LTK2MCU-LAW2MRT2NDMC-D612NKUTEE2Notebook2TKU_trans2Ancient1Android1ask1CD-R1Chinese-B871ck58th3021CPU_7711CPU_PA7311Cross_Life1CSMU-Band1CSMU-MED931CSMU-N951CYCU_MIS_93A1CYUT1DistantLove1esahc1Evangelion1FJU-ACC90a1FJU-ACC91a1FJU-ACCR941FJU-EE-2005B1FJU_AD-011FJU_AD-031FJU_Chiayun1FJU_CLASS1FJU_OT2nd1FJU_PSY0941Gamesale1Gash1Ghost-Shell1God_Drop1graduate1Hate1Henin1HLHS_10thU1HoneyClover1HSNU_10051HSNU_9771Hunter1ID_Problem1kachaball1KS94-3071KS94-3201KS97-3181L_RelaxEnjoy1MacShop1marriage1marvel1Militarylife1money1Nanoha1NCCU_BM1NCCU_Info1NCHU-AGR981NDS1NKNU_Eng92B1NTHU-MSE091NTHU_STAT941ntnuHE951NTOU_MMD93A1NTPU-ACC871NTPU-STAT931NTUE_Nse961NTUEP1NTUGIEE_AMTG1NTUST-EE-B911NTUT_EE490A1PingTung1PushDoll1RO1Rozen_Maiden1RSSH91_3011RSSH92_3051SCU_ACC_96A1SK_SD_PL1SMHS91_3061SSSH-13th3141SuperHeroes1TaiwanDrama1TFSHS65th3151THUIM-5th1TMU-K2X1toberich1TTU-talk1TunHua05t3111TYSH48-3011USC1Viator94Ding1VideoCard1Wanhua1welcome_NHK1Yanzi1YLclub1<< 收起看板(181)
首頁
上一頁
1
下一頁
尾頁
25F→:很好呀,GATS的規定比ECFA談的齊全多了04/12 14:37
7F→:天哪....你千萬不能當談判代表,我怕會被你賣掉04/05 19:14
8F→:ECFA只有協商的義務,你先去看清楚條文好嗎04/05 19:14
12F→:ECFA沒有說,後面的服貿貨貿都一定要通過04/05 19:15
16F→:照你的解釋,我真擔心現在支持現版本服貿草率通過的人的未來04/05 19:16
21F→:可我們之前跟美國談,也是國會不同意後,退回重談呀04/05 18:44
24F→:還有你說兩岸關係條例,那也只是個說明法律保留原則的規定04/05 18:45
26F→:誰認定需不需要修法?還是立法院呀04/05 18:46
32F→:已經簽的因為法不溯及,就沒辦法了,但服貿正在簽啊04/05 18:48
34F→:你到底有沒有先去看過法學相關的論述呀?04/05 18:49
3F→:這點我認同,只是覺得政府為何不明說?04/05 18:47
1F→:不行呀,這個中國我可以呀....04/04 21:52
25F推:把美國TPA的法條丟給父母看,自由貿易協定是需要國會審的04/04 20:02
6F推:九點群賢樓,不見不散!04/01 19:57
105F→:天哪....你居然可以說沒有違憲....法律保留原則跟權力分立03/31 21:29
106F→:都可以推導出違憲的結論,你居然可以看條文就說沒違憲?03/31 21:29
107F→:現在的實際程序就是國會完全沒有置喙的空間,你居然可以無視?03/31 21:30
108F→:程序正義不是有就好...天哪...你真的有作過功課嗎?03/31 21:31
16F→:http://www.cna.com.tw/news/firstnews/201403295005-1.aspx03/29 19:22
17F→:上面是全文稿,我可沒有亂改別人的話。03/29 19:22
首頁
上一頁
1
下一頁
尾頁