作者查詢 / aloness
作者 aloness 在 PTT [ StockPicket ] 看板的留言(推文), 共1800則
限定看板:StockPicket
看板排序:
全部home-sale26592Stock24795Kaohsiung2970StockPicket1800CFP842Koei729Tech_Job626Chan_Mou600Gossiping594SRW401Law-Service354car345Military283Salary250movie219FireEmblem164GVOnline154HatePolitics133CMWang121NY-Yankees105AboutBoards103Baseball103TY_Research103L_LifeInfo86PokemonGO86ONE_PIECE80ChainChron79BoardCourt77nCoV201970NBA69money68MLB67Employee57WorldCup39Elephants31GoldenEagles30Hiking29Sagittarius27ForeignEX25Lions23Sangokumusou23PublicIssue22Golden-Award21Old-Games21Philippines21NSwitch20basketballTW19Tainan19WOW18Monkeys17Economics15Urban_Plan15Zombie15WomenTalk12Pisces11BioHazard9joke9Nationals9C_Chat8cksh85th3198CSMU-Talk8FatMonkeys8Guardians8Marginalman8marriage8HCKuo7sex7Bank_Service6NeedFood6Orioles6PokeMon6CLHu4Emergency4NobuOnline4PingTung4Boy-Girl3CrossStrait3FinalFantasy3Gov_owned3Insurance3kochikame3Malaysia3MdnCNhistory3OgreBattle3TW-history3young-jiang3Chiayi2EarthScience2Ecophilia2Fund2GUNDAM2ID_Multi2Japan_Travel2L_TalkandCha2LAW2LTK2MaiKuraki2NCCU_SEED2NCU97ME-B2NTU-EM922Nurse2PlayStation2Soft_Job2BabyMother1Beauty1BoardGame1Buddhism1CCU-3DVG1CFantasy1ChiLing1ck51st3281Digitalhome1DragonBall1Evangelion1FCU_ECON_93B1FJU-ACC90a1FLAT_CLUB1GAMEMUSIC1Germany1HSNU_10981Hunter1Ichiro1Interior1KERORO1KOU1KS92-3061KS96-3181KS97-3201KS_PMAC1KUAS1L_TaiwanPlaz1Lifeismoney1Little-Games1Mechanical1media-chaos1Militarylife1NANLIN3011NCKU_ECO971NDHU-phy1021NTUST_Talk1Option1PublicServan1Road1SAN-YanYi1Scorpio1Simcity1specialman1sttmountain1TaichungBun1TFSHS64th3091TKU_EE_92C1TNFSH98th1TOEIC1Tour-Manager1Warfare1Whales1YP97-3131<< 收起看板(157)
10F→: 全ptt有哪個版面,版工只能處理檢舉不能主動處理違規,03/30 09:45
11F→: 你倒是舉來聽聽03/30 09:45
113F→: 4-6-1原意是"須與股票相關",不是每個政治議題都會跟總體03/30 01:24
114F→: 經濟上市櫃公司行號、產業特性有關03/30 01:24
115F→: 4-6-1刪除,代表這版也開放聊憲政改革,廢死,同性結婚,03/30 01:28
116F→: 役期,美麗島大審,軍公教薪餉 這類跟股票/市場毫無關聯03/30 01:28
117F→: 的議題,想清楚了?03/30 01:28
16F→: 小雨等狀況我會看有無相關證據(例如站內信),有的話有人03/30 01:22
17F→: 來投訴我就會拿來用…其他的像黑絲這種是說好玩的成份居03/30 01:22
18F→: 多,閒聊之中尺度也就放寬些了03/30 01:22
21F→: 兩個部份,立委部份舉證為etf相關政策質詢,雖非原文提及03/30 01:12
22F→: 的政治人物,但內容的確高度相關原文,也未指名道姓,倒03/30 01:12
23F→: 可從寬認定為事實舉證;網紅部份舉證影片的片頭片尾介紹03/30 01:12
24F→: 就是一直在招募會員,倒也說不上立場…問題在於要是原文03/30 01:12
25F→: 要是講"某網紅"那大概就沒什麼問題,該網紅影片版框色調03/30 01:12
26F→: 收費影片倒是黑色的,也無一致代表性03/30 01:12
7F→: https://i.imgur.com/XkwqiUl.jpg 原因就這出處,不然叫03/24 20:57
8F→: 他話吞回去吧…03/24 20:57
1F推: [1]~[5]4-6-1成立03/21 23:28
2F→: [6]大致上也與原文意相關,傾向未達03/21 23:30
1F推: 4-1 & 4-2-1成立03/21 23:26
1F推: 4-2-1成立03/21 23:25
1F推: 4-2-1成立03/21 23:24
1F推: 1-2-3成立03/21 23:23