Re: [問題] 拜託請讓求今天的剛果門診!!
我真的搞不懂,為什麼大家覺得全預約制是合理的?
平常在剛果看醫生的兔子突然需要掛急診,這時候你選擇上網求讓診還是去別間醫院看?
醫術什麼的是很主觀的,所以撇開醫術不談,別間醫生看你家的兔子再怎麼樣都沒有你
平常去健檢的醫院熟悉不是嗎?
別的不說,兔子的病歷只有在剛果才有,你選擇去別間看的話,對他們來說這是一支新
的兔子,沒辦法知道他之前的症狀,所以診斷也相對的困難,這樣對掛急診的兔子好嗎?
以我個人來說,除非萬不得已,我還是希望我的兔子都能在同一家醫院看診,不論我是
健檢還是生病,畢竟看得越久醫生也越了解我家的兔子。
所以覺得全預約制很合理的人,都覺得兔子永遠不需要看急診嗎?
可以讓醫院開個至少1/3給急診或是現場掛號的兔子不是很好嗎?
--
▄▄ ▄▄ ▄▄▄▄ ▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▌
▄▄█▄▄█▄▄▌▌ ▄▄ ▄▄▌▄▄▌
▌ ▌▄▄ ▌ ▌▄▄▄▌ ▌ ▌▄▄▄
▄█▄▄▄ ▄▄ ▄▄ ▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▌
▌ ▌▄▄ ▄▄▄▌ ▌▌▌▌▄▄ ▌ ▌
▄▄▄▄▄█▌▄▄▄▄▄▌ ▌▄▄▄▄▄▄
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 220.136.64.149
推
07/06 19:52, , 1F
07/06 19:52, 1F
→
07/06 20:04, , 2F
07/06 20:04, 2F
推
07/06 20:15, , 3F
07/06 20:15, 3F
推
07/06 20:23, , 4F
07/06 20:23, 4F
→
07/06 20:23, , 5F
07/06 20:23, 5F
推
07/06 20:53, , 6F
07/06 20:53, 6F
→
07/06 20:54, , 7F
07/06 20:54, 7F
推
07/06 21:16, , 8F
07/06 21:16, 8F
→
07/06 21:33, , 9F
07/06 21:33, 9F
推
07/06 21:40, , 10F
07/06 21:40, 10F
→
07/06 21:40, , 11F
07/06 21:40, 11F
→
07/06 21:41, , 12F
07/06 21:41, 12F
→
07/06 21:47, , 13F
07/06 21:47, 13F
→
07/06 21:48, , 14F
07/06 21:48, 14F
推
07/06 21:51, , 15F
07/06 21:51, 15F
推
07/06 22:05, , 16F
07/06 22:05, 16F
推
07/06 22:10, , 17F
07/06 22:10, 17F
→
07/06 22:11, , 18F
07/06 22:11, 18F
→
07/06 22:12, , 19F
07/06 22:12, 19F
→
07/06 22:12, , 20F
07/06 22:12, 20F
→
07/06 22:12, , 21F
07/06 22:12, 21F
→
07/06 22:13, , 22F
07/06 22:13, 22F
→
07/06 22:13, , 23F
07/06 22:13, 23F
→
07/06 22:14, , 24F
07/06 22:14, 24F
→
07/06 22:14, , 25F
07/06 22:14, 25F
推
07/06 22:16, , 26F
07/06 22:16, 26F
推
07/06 22:19, , 27F
07/06 22:19, 27F
→
07/06 22:19, , 28F
07/06 22:19, 28F
推
07/06 22:20, , 29F
07/06 22:20, 29F
→
07/06 22:21, , 30F
07/06 22:21, 30F
→
07/06 22:22, , 31F
07/06 22:22, 31F
→
07/06 22:35, , 32F
07/06 22:35, 32F
→
07/06 22:36, , 33F
07/06 22:36, 33F
→
07/06 22:37, , 34F
07/06 22:37, 34F
→
07/06 22:38, , 35F
07/06 22:38, 35F
→
07/06 22:39, , 36F
07/06 22:39, 36F
→
07/06 22:40, , 37F
07/06 22:40, 37F
推
07/06 22:41, , 38F
07/06 22:41, 38F
→
07/06 22:42, , 39F
07/06 22:42, 39F
→
07/06 22:43, , 40F
07/06 22:43, 40F
→
07/06 23:28, , 41F
07/06 23:28, 41F
→
07/06 23:29, , 42F
07/06 23:29, 42F
推
07/06 23:34, , 43F
07/06 23:34, 43F
→
07/06 23:34, , 44F
07/06 23:34, 44F
→
07/06 23:35, , 45F
07/06 23:35, 45F
→
07/06 23:35, , 46F
07/06 23:35, 46F
推
07/06 23:47, , 47F
07/06 23:47, 47F
→
07/06 23:47, , 48F
07/06 23:47, 48F
推
07/07 00:29, , 49F
07/07 00:29, 49F
→
07/07 00:33, , 50F
07/07 00:33, 50F
→
07/07 00:34, , 51F
07/07 00:34, 51F
→
07/07 00:35, , 52F
07/07 00:35, 52F
推
07/07 00:54, , 53F
07/07 00:54, 53F
→
07/07 00:54, , 54F
07/07 00:54, 54F
推
07/07 09:03, , 55F
07/07 09:03, 55F
→
07/07 09:04, , 56F
07/07 09:04, 56F
推
07/07 10:37, , 57F
07/07 10:37, 57F
→
07/07 10:38, , 58F
07/07 10:38, 58F
→
07/07 10:38, , 59F
07/07 10:38, 59F
→
07/07 10:40, , 60F
07/07 10:40, 60F
→
07/07 10:41, , 61F
07/07 10:41, 61F
推
07/07 11:05, , 62F
07/07 11:05, 62F
推
07/07 12:52, , 63F
07/07 12:52, 63F
→
07/07 13:41, , 64F
07/07 13:41, 64F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文:
完整討論串 (本文為第 6 之 13 篇):