Re: [分享] 中國車媒評納智捷U5
納牌犯了什麼錯,很簡單,就是自以為是
一個新品牌憑什麼要人家買單?
有什麼引以為傲的技術,還是特殊的原因嗎?
從納牌看來就是什麼也沒
憑著一個愛國心就想和日系韓系這些大廠售價平起平坐
會不會太好笑了一些
舉個韓國現代為例
當年現代進軍美國,也是名不見經傳的小車廠
人家靠什麼達成今天的成就
比一線品牌低的售價和十年的超長保固
當年現代可是狂到十年內進廠修車都不用錢
總會吸引一些經濟不好的人買單
沒有量怎麼會知道自己做的車問題在哪
這些人就是當你的白老鼠幫你練功
說這樣搞會虧錢?
在成功之前本來就是會虧錢的
如果連這點錢都虧不起,憑什麼說自己要進軍世界?
再舉Lexus為例
當初豐田可是徹底研究過美國市場的
一開始的Lexus定價就是略低於雙B,內裝配備略高於雙B
再靠著當年LS400那顆高品質的引擎慢慢打下江山
才有今天的成功
如果只想賺Easy money
那只能說成功品牌車廠永遠與他無緣
連自己的品牌定位都搞不清楚
連自己的車廠有幾兩重都一團混亂
隨便定價就要人家買單的車廠
說自己會成功誰會相信?
-----
Sent from JPTT on my HTC_U-1u.
--
這個世界並不只有黑色跟白色,你能接受越多灰色地帶,代表你越成熟
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 118.167.118.20
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/car/M.1505742399.A.79B.html
推
09/18 21:48, , 1F
09/18 21:48, 1F
→
09/18 21:48, , 2F
09/18 21:48, 2F
可是人家的決心和毅力有多大你有看到嗎?
他們可不是只會找政府討拍拍的這種角色
推
09/18 21:52, , 3F
09/18 21:52, 3F
→
09/18 21:52, , 4F
09/18 21:52, 4F
→
09/18 21:52, , 5F
09/18 21:52, 5F
推
09/18 21:53, , 6F
09/18 21:53, 6F
推
09/18 21:54, , 7F
09/18 21:54, 7F
推
09/18 21:55, , 8F
09/18 21:55, 8F
※ 編輯: DoraeCookie (118.167.118.20), 09/18/2017 22:01:21
推
09/18 22:14, , 9F
09/18 22:14, 9F
→
09/18 22:17, , 10F
09/18 22:17, 10F
推
09/18 22:18, , 11F
09/18 22:18, 11F
推
09/18 22:20, , 12F
09/18 22:20, 12F
推
09/18 22:23, , 13F
09/18 22:23, 13F
→
09/18 22:25, , 14F
09/18 22:25, 14F
→
09/18 22:25, , 15F
09/18 22:25, 15F
推
09/18 22:32, , 16F
09/18 22:32, 16F
→
09/18 22:33, , 17F
09/18 22:33, 17F
推
09/18 22:36, , 18F
09/18 22:36, 18F
推
09/18 22:36, , 19F
09/18 22:36, 19F
→
09/18 22:36, , 20F
09/18 22:36, 20F
→
09/18 22:36, , 21F
09/18 22:36, 21F
推
09/18 22:37, , 22F
09/18 22:37, 22F
→
09/18 22:37, , 23F
09/18 22:37, 23F
推
09/18 22:49, , 24F
09/18 22:49, 24F
→
09/18 22:54, , 25F
09/18 22:54, 25F
→
09/18 23:01, , 26F
09/18 23:01, 26F
推
09/18 23:02, , 27F
09/18 23:02, 27F
推
09/18 23:07, , 28F
09/18 23:07, 28F
→
09/18 23:07, , 29F
09/18 23:07, 29F
推
09/18 23:08, , 30F
09/18 23:08, 30F
→
09/18 23:08, , 31F
09/18 23:08, 31F
推
09/18 23:09, , 32F
09/18 23:09, 32F
推
09/18 23:11, , 33F
09/18 23:11, 33F
推
09/18 23:14, , 34F
09/18 23:14, 34F
推
09/18 23:15, , 35F
09/18 23:15, 35F
推
09/18 23:16, , 36F
09/18 23:16, 36F
推
09/18 23:17, , 37F
09/18 23:17, 37F
還有 112 則推文
還有 3 段內文
推
09/19 11:46, , 150F
09/19 11:46, 150F
→
09/19 11:46, , 151F
09/19 11:46, 151F
→
09/19 11:47, , 152F
09/19 11:47, 152F
→
09/19 11:47, , 153F
09/19 11:47, 153F
推
09/19 12:16, , 154F
09/19 12:16, 154F
→
09/19 12:16, , 155F
09/19 12:16, 155F
推
09/19 12:17, , 156F
09/19 12:17, 156F
推
09/19 12:22, , 157F
09/19 12:22, 157F
→
09/19 12:23, , 158F
09/19 12:23, 158F
→
09/19 12:25, , 159F
09/19 12:25, 159F
推
09/19 13:13, , 160F
09/19 13:13, 160F
推
09/19 13:37, , 161F
09/19 13:37, 161F
推
09/19 13:54, , 162F
09/19 13:54, 162F
推
09/19 14:49, , 163F
09/19 14:49, 163F
推
09/19 16:32, , 164F
09/19 16:32, 164F
推
09/19 16:37, , 165F
09/19 16:37, 165F
→
09/19 16:37, , 166F
09/19 16:37, 166F
→
09/19 16:37, , 167F
09/19 16:37, 167F
推
09/19 17:00, , 168F
09/19 17:00, 168F
→
09/19 17:00, , 169F
09/19 17:00, 169F
→
09/19 17:05, , 170F
09/19 17:05, 170F
→
09/19 17:05, , 171F
09/19 17:05, 171F
→
09/19 17:42, , 172F
09/19 17:42, 172F
→
09/19 17:43, , 173F
09/19 17:43, 173F
→
09/19 17:43, , 174F
09/19 17:43, 174F
推
09/19 17:46, , 175F
09/19 17:46, 175F
推
09/20 11:04, , 176F
09/20 11:04, 176F
→
09/20 11:04, , 177F
09/20 11:04, 177F
推
09/20 13:06, , 178F
09/20 13:06, 178F
→
09/20 13:07, , 179F
09/20 13:07, 179F
→
09/20 13:07, , 180F
09/20 13:07, 180F
→
09/20 13:08, , 181F
09/20 13:08, 181F
→
09/20 13:09, , 182F
09/20 13:09, 182F
→
09/20 13:10, , 183F
09/20 13:10, 183F
→
09/20 13:11, , 184F
09/20 13:11, 184F
→
09/20 13:12, , 185F
09/20 13:12, 185F
推
09/20 14:47, , 186F
09/20 14:47, 186F
推
09/20 17:57, , 187F
09/20 17:57, 187F
→
09/20 17:57, , 188F
09/20 17:57, 188F
推
09/23 00:32, , 189F
09/23 00:32, 189F
討論串 (同標題文章)