Re: [閒聊] 使用權,所有權。
法律這部份我不是專業,但以自身熟悉的例子舉例的話其實還滿好懂的
如果消費者某日買了一本小說
那麼他當然有對那本書籍的各種使用權利
只要不妨礙到他人的權益,就算不爽書中內容以及於要撕書吃書都是自由
(至於燒書?理論上也可以啦,但說不定會觸犯空汙法?)
然而即使消費者擁有手上購買書籍的使用權利
這並不代表他也擁有書中作品本身的版權,那是屬於作者和出版社的版權
也就是說消費者買的是那本書的使用權利,而非包含了書中內容的使用權利
……其實我最不懂的是,為什麼XB1的討論會離題到這種內容?
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 122.254.20.189
推
06/16 14:52, , 1F
06/16 14:52, 1F
→
06/16 14:53, , 2F
06/16 14:53, 2F
→
06/16 14:54, , 3F
06/16 14:54, 3F
推
06/16 14:54, , 4F
06/16 14:54, 4F
推
06/16 15:06, , 5F
06/16 15:06, 5F
→
06/16 15:06, , 6F
06/16 15:06, 6F
→
06/16 15:07, , 7F
06/16 15:07, 7F
推
06/16 15:49, , 8F
06/16 15:49, 8F
→
06/16 15:50, , 9F
06/16 15:50, 9F
→
06/16 15:52, , 10F
06/16 15:52, 10F
推
06/16 15:55, , 11F
06/16 15:55, 11F
→
06/16 16:03, , 12F
06/16 16:03, 12F
→
06/16 16:03, , 13F
06/16 16:03, 13F
→
06/16 16:04, , 14F
06/16 16:04, 14F
推
06/16 16:20, , 15F
06/16 16:20, 15F
→
06/16 16:24, , 16F
06/16 16:24, 16F
→
06/16 16:26, , 17F
06/16 16:26, 17F
→
06/16 16:28, , 18F
06/16 16:28, 18F
→
06/16 16:29, , 19F
06/16 16:29, 19F
→
06/16 16:31, , 20F
06/16 16:31, 20F
→
06/16 16:32, , 21F
06/16 16:32, 21F
→
06/16 16:33, , 22F
06/16 16:33, 22F
→
06/16 16:34, , 23F
06/16 16:34, 23F
→
06/16 16:35, , 24F
06/16 16:35, 24F
推
06/16 16:38, , 25F
06/16 16:38, 25F
推
06/16 16:39, , 26F
06/16 16:39, 26F
→
06/16 16:39, , 27F
06/16 16:39, 27F
→
06/16 16:40, , 28F
06/16 16:40, 28F
→
06/16 16:40, , 29F
06/16 16:40, 29F
→
06/16 16:40, , 30F
06/16 16:40, 30F
推
06/16 18:23, , 31F
06/16 18:23, 31F
→
06/16 18:24, , 32F
06/16 18:24, 32F
→
06/16 18:25, , 33F
06/16 18:25, 33F
推
06/16 18:28, , 34F
06/16 18:28, 34F
推
06/16 21:47, , 35F
06/16 21:47, 35F
→
06/16 21:48, , 36F
06/16 21:48, 36F
討論串 (同標題文章)