[心得] 生技實在不需要列太重點產業
如題~
因為原因如下:
1.生藥研發創造的工作機會不多,尤指生科出身的,開一堆生科系,這些上市上櫃興櫃的
公司根本不用他們,,用也是低階實驗勞動者,創造出生技新貴機率很低
2.資本密集的產業,簡言之就是有錢才能拿到門票的遊戲,這個遊戲的主導權是出錢的
那個人,就算最後成功上市了,賺進大把鈔票,也是少數股東所有,其他人只能吃土
3. 新藥研發九成的機率都會打水瓢,最後只有一種成功了,那時候生技也已經死了, 現在
只是大家在興沖沖而已,你看解盲失敗個幾次,投資人還會想玩?
4.生技股可以吸收游資,如果現在資金太氾濫的話,可以把資金投入消磨個幾次,減少游資
這是炒生技股的好處
結論:生技股是很好的炒作工具,但是結果論會造成貧富差距變大,因為資訊不對稱,但誠如
蔡總統所說,要發展其他產業,不過所謂"其他產業",最好不要壓寶在生技產業,因為吃土
的人太多了,不要把賓果賓果當作是發展重點
沒有FDA藥證,浩鼎只值40元而已,就算有藥證治乳癌是要有多少產值?? 切掉是不是比較
快?
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 111.252.243.227
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/Stock/M.1456566245.A.B06.html
推
02/27 17:46, , 1F
02/27 17:46, 1F
推
02/27 17:49, , 2F
02/27 17:49, 2F
推
02/27 17:50, , 3F
02/27 17:50, 3F
推
02/27 17:50, , 4F
02/27 17:50, 4F
→
02/27 17:51, , 5F
02/27 17:51, 5F
→
02/27 17:52, , 6F
02/27 17:52, 6F
推
02/27 17:52, , 7F
02/27 17:52, 7F
推
02/27 17:53, , 8F
02/27 17:53, 8F
推
02/27 17:55, , 9F
02/27 17:55, 9F
→
02/27 17:55, , 10F
02/27 17:55, 10F
→
02/27 17:55, , 11F
02/27 17:55, 11F
推
02/27 17:55, , 12F
02/27 17:55, 12F
推
02/27 17:55, , 13F
02/27 17:55, 13F
→
02/27 18:00, , 14F
02/27 18:00, 14F
→
02/27 18:01, , 15F
02/27 18:01, 15F
推
02/27 18:02, , 16F
02/27 18:02, 16F
→
02/27 18:13, , 17F
02/27 18:13, 17F
→
02/27 18:13, , 18F
02/27 18:13, 18F
→
02/27 18:14, , 19F
02/27 18:14, 19F
→
02/27 18:15, , 20F
02/27 18:15, 20F
→
02/27 18:15, , 21F
02/27 18:15, 21F
→
02/27 18:16, , 22F
02/27 18:16, 22F
→
02/27 18:17, , 23F
02/27 18:17, 23F
推
02/27 18:30, , 24F
02/27 18:30, 24F
噓
02/27 18:33, , 25F
02/27 18:33, 25F
推
02/27 18:39, , 26F
02/27 18:39, 26F
噓
02/27 18:42, , 27F
02/27 18:42, 27F
→
02/27 18:42, , 28F
02/27 18:42, 28F
→
02/27 18:42, , 29F
02/27 18:42, 29F
噓
02/27 18:42, , 30F
02/27 18:42, 30F
→
02/27 18:43, , 31F
02/27 18:43, 31F
推
02/27 18:43, , 32F
02/27 18:43, 32F
噓
02/27 18:44, , 33F
02/27 18:44, 33F
噓
02/27 18:45, , 34F
02/27 18:45, 34F
→
02/27 18:45, , 35F
02/27 18:45, 35F
推
02/27 18:46, , 36F
02/27 18:46, 36F
→
02/27 18:46, , 37F
02/27 18:46, 37F
噓
02/27 18:55, , 38F
02/27 18:55, 38F
→
02/27 18:55, , 39F
02/27 18:55, 39F
還有 60 則推文
推
02/27 22:13, , 100F
02/27 22:13, 100F
→
02/27 22:47, , 101F
02/27 22:47, 101F
推
02/27 23:10, , 102F
02/27 23:10, 102F
噓
02/27 23:17, , 103F
02/27 23:17, 103F
噓
02/27 23:45, , 104F
02/27 23:45, 104F
噓
02/27 23:48, , 105F
02/27 23:48, 105F
推
02/28 00:20, , 106F
02/28 00:20, 106F
→
02/28 00:20, , 107F
02/28 00:20, 107F
推
02/28 01:19, , 108F
02/28 01:19, 108F
噓
02/28 01:37, , 109F
02/28 01:37, 109F
→
02/28 01:38, , 110F
02/28 01:38, 110F
噓
02/28 01:58, , 111F
02/28 01:58, 111F
→
02/28 01:58, , 112F
02/28 01:58, 112F
噓
02/28 02:00, , 113F
02/28 02:00, 113F
推
02/28 02:19, , 114F
02/28 02:19, 114F
噓
02/28 06:58, , 115F
02/28 06:58, 115F
推
02/28 07:35, , 116F
02/28 07:35, 116F
→
02/28 07:35, , 117F
02/28 07:35, 117F
→
02/28 07:36, , 118F
02/28 07:36, 118F
推
02/28 09:49, , 119F
02/28 09:49, 119F
→
02/28 09:49, , 120F
02/28 09:49, 120F
推
02/28 10:13, , 121F
02/28 10:13, 121F
推
02/28 10:19, , 122F
02/28 10:19, 122F
推
02/28 10:22, , 123F
02/28 10:22, 123F
→
02/28 10:23, , 124F
02/28 10:23, 124F
→
02/28 10:25, , 125F
02/28 10:25, 125F
推
02/28 12:43, , 126F
02/28 12:43, 126F
→
02/28 12:44, , 127F
02/28 12:44, 127F
推
02/28 13:25, , 128F
02/28 13:25, 128F
噓
02/28 13:40, , 129F
02/28 13:40, 129F
推
02/28 14:20, , 130F
02/28 14:20, 130F
噓
02/28 16:13, , 131F
02/28 16:13, 131F
噓
02/28 18:50, , 132F
02/28 18:50, 132F
噓
02/29 01:10, , 133F
02/29 01:10, 133F
→
02/29 01:12, , 134F
02/29 01:12, 134F
→
02/29 01:15, , 135F
02/29 01:15, 135F
推
02/29 09:25, , 136F
02/29 09:25, 136F
→
03/01 07:12, , 137F
03/01 07:12, 137F
推
03/01 11:00, , 138F
03/01 11:00, 138F
推
03/03 21:24, , 139F
03/03 21:24, 139F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文:
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 20 篇):