Re: [新聞] 促進產業 黃國昌:台灣不需另一個台
黃國昌講的也有道理,台積電投資1000億台幣只能蓋一座晶圓廠.
買外國的機台,錢都被應材,ASML等外國廠商賺走了.
然後這1000億,只能創造出幾百個工作機會,大約500個吧,畢竟現在自動化程度
越來越高.
但是這1000億台幣假如那去開咖啡廳,搞文創小確幸.可以開超過10000家咖啡廳.
1000億可以開20萬個雞排攤.
假設一家咖啡廳可以雇四個員工,加上老闆1人.10000家咖啡廳就可創造50000個工作機會.
200000個雞排攤,一攤雇一個員工就好,加老闆1人.就可創造400000個工作機會.
1000億台幣給台積電,只能蓋一座廠,創造500個工作機會.
給咖啡廳可以創造50000個工作機會
給雞排攤可以創造400000個工作機會
可見台積電耗費了多少台灣的資源???從人才到金融.
台灣為了台積電付出了多少機會成本???
我認為黃國昌要說的是這個.
有人說咖啡廳有甚麼用,雞排攤有什麼用??????
也許這1000億砸下去,10000間咖啡廳說不定會有間台巴克,可以打垮星巴克成為台灣之光.
200000萬間雞排攤,說不定有一間會成為台德基,台當勞打敗肯德基麥當勞啊,
誰說不可能??? 雖然我討厭黃國昌,但不以人廢言,他說的是正確的.
台灣為了台積電已經付出太多太大的代價了.
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 111.251.178.43
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/Stock/M.1455017526.A.8CB.html
→
02/09 19:35, , 1F
02/09 19:35, 1F
→
02/09 19:36, , 2F
02/09 19:36, 2F
噓
02/09 19:38, , 3F
02/09 19:38, 3F
→
02/09 19:39, , 4F
02/09 19:39, 4F
推
02/09 19:40, , 5F
02/09 19:40, 5F
噓
02/09 19:41, , 6F
02/09 19:41, 6F
→
02/09 19:41, , 7F
02/09 19:41, 7F
推
02/09 19:42, , 8F
02/09 19:42, 8F
→
02/09 19:46, , 9F
02/09 19:46, 9F
推
02/09 19:47, , 10F
02/09 19:47, 10F
噓
02/09 19:54, , 11F
02/09 19:54, 11F
→
02/09 19:54, , 12F
02/09 19:54, 12F
推
02/09 19:54, , 13F
02/09 19:54, 13F
推
02/09 20:00, , 14F
02/09 20:00, 14F
推
02/09 20:00, , 15F
02/09 20:00, 15F
→
02/09 20:01, , 16F
02/09 20:01, 16F
→
02/09 20:01, , 17F
02/09 20:01, 17F
推
02/09 20:02, , 18F
02/09 20:02, 18F
→
02/09 20:03, , 19F
02/09 20:03, 19F
→
02/09 20:04, , 20F
02/09 20:04, 20F
推
02/09 20:06, , 21F
02/09 20:06, 21F
→
02/09 20:07, , 22F
02/09 20:07, 22F
→
02/09 20:08, , 23F
02/09 20:08, 23F
推
02/09 20:08, , 24F
02/09 20:08, 24F
推
02/09 20:11, , 25F
02/09 20:11, 25F
→
02/09 20:12, , 26F
02/09 20:12, 26F
→
02/09 20:13, , 27F
02/09 20:13, 27F
推
02/09 20:14, , 28F
02/09 20:14, 28F
→
02/09 20:15, , 29F
02/09 20:15, 29F
→
02/09 20:21, , 30F
02/09 20:21, 30F
→
02/09 20:21, , 31F
02/09 20:21, 31F
→
02/09 20:22, , 32F
02/09 20:22, 32F
→
02/09 20:22, , 33F
02/09 20:22, 33F
→
02/09 20:27, , 34F
02/09 20:27, 34F
推
02/09 20:29, , 35F
02/09 20:29, 35F
推
02/09 20:30, , 36F
02/09 20:30, 36F
→
02/09 20:30, , 37F
02/09 20:30, 37F
噓
02/09 20:33, , 38F
02/09 20:33, 38F
→
02/09 20:39, , 39F
02/09 20:39, 39F
還有 65 則推文
→
02/10 00:31, , 105F
02/10 00:31, 105F
→
02/10 00:31, , 106F
02/10 00:31, 106F
→
02/10 00:31, , 107F
02/10 00:31, 107F
→
02/10 00:35, , 108F
02/10 00:35, 108F
→
02/10 00:35, , 109F
02/10 00:35, 109F
→
02/10 00:35, , 110F
02/10 00:35, 110F
→
02/10 00:35, , 111F
02/10 00:35, 111F
→
02/10 00:37, , 112F
02/10 00:37, 112F
→
02/10 00:37, , 113F
02/10 00:37, 113F
→
02/10 00:38, , 114F
02/10 00:38, 114F
→
02/10 00:38, , 115F
02/10 00:38, 115F
→
02/10 00:39, , 116F
02/10 00:39, 116F
→
02/10 00:39, , 117F
02/10 00:39, 117F
→
02/10 00:45, , 118F
02/10 00:45, 118F
→
02/10 00:53, , 119F
02/10 00:53, 119F
推
02/10 00:54, , 120F
02/10 00:54, 120F
→
02/10 00:55, , 121F
02/10 00:55, 121F
→
02/10 00:55, , 122F
02/10 00:55, 122F
→
02/10 00:56, , 123F
02/10 00:56, 123F
推
02/10 01:05, , 124F
02/10 01:05, 124F
→
02/10 01:05, , 125F
02/10 01:05, 125F
推
02/10 01:34, , 126F
02/10 01:34, 126F
噓
02/10 09:06, , 127F
02/10 09:06, 127F
→
02/10 09:06, , 128F
02/10 09:06, 128F
推
02/10 10:04, , 129F
02/10 10:04, 129F
→
02/10 10:04, , 130F
02/10 10:04, 130F
推
02/10 10:08, , 131F
02/10 10:08, 131F
推
02/10 10:15, , 132F
02/10 10:15, 132F
→
02/10 10:16, , 133F
02/10 10:16, 133F
→
02/10 10:16, , 134F
02/10 10:16, 134F
→
02/10 11:08, , 135F
02/10 11:08, 135F
推
02/10 15:52, , 136F
02/10 15:52, 136F
噓
02/10 22:35, , 137F
02/10 22:35, 137F
→
02/10 22:36, , 138F
02/10 22:36, 138F
推
02/10 23:47, , 139F
02/10 23:47, 139F
噓
02/11 00:46, , 140F
02/11 00:46, 140F
噓
02/11 00:58, , 141F
02/11 00:58, 141F
噓
02/11 08:01, , 142F
02/11 08:01, 142F
→
02/11 08:01, , 143F
02/11 08:01, 143F
噓
02/11 11:20, , 144F
02/11 11:20, 144F
討論串 (同標題文章)
完整討論串 (本文為第 2 之 10 篇):