[討論] 搭南迴鐵路的心酸
原訂:高雄-台東-高雄
432普悠瑪在台東轉程328自強
平常因為都是同月台,
車長都說328一定會等432才能開。
有很多次的連假返鄉(誤點)經驗,
都順利轉程,
五小時車程因此能從原本11點(又常誤點)到9:45縮短ㄧ小時搭車時間。
但今天因為普悠瑪誤點,
328就開走了!
台鐵人員只能幫忙換票,
沒位置只能自己認了...
「票一丟,要拿不拿隨便你...」
「這是轉程要承擔的風險...」
全台灣人都酸到「沒誤點才是八卦」
這種國營事業沒法監督?
好像我們兩週前辛苦訂票訂假的...
我們知道基層的辛苦,
車也不是售票員開,
就像颱風因素週五才搭程也毫無怨言~
很多次不爽大聲也沒用啊~
(南部人不就是去騎山豬)
基層也是辛苦服務
只是這一間國營事業的內部溝通已經到腐敗地步
我們搭南迴的早已懶的吼、懶的罵
「誤點是常態,風險自己擔」
多年搭南迴真的很感慨
一樣是要翻山越嶺
北迴從自強、太魯閣、到普悠瑪
南迴有什麼?
車廂有蟑螂、煤油味、引擎聲、常誤點
多謝北迴開到台東的快車才讓我們爽到ㄧ段車程
不然花蓮-高雄一天就各三班去回
搭車時間五個半小時...
鐵路沒電氣化至少也要花東雙向
不然普悠瑪等莒光自強先走也搞笑哦~
直到今天...看到基層不當ㄧ回事的態度
(台東站月台、售票、服務台)
真的是忍無可忍
PO 在這裡是想讓更多人知道
除了不會有任何回應的台鐵申訴管道
還有沒有其他方法表達南迴發展的無耐?
有鄉民也有同樣感受的嗎?
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 223.138.248.165
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/Railway/M.1474204966.A.6FF.html
推
09/18 21:28, , 1F
09/18 21:28, 1F
→
09/18 21:30, , 2F
09/18 21:30, 2F
→
09/18 21:30, , 3F
09/18 21:30, 3F
→
09/18 21:30, , 4F
09/18 21:30, 4F
→
09/18 21:30, , 5F
09/18 21:30, 5F
→
09/18 21:31, , 6F
09/18 21:31, 6F
→
09/18 21:31, , 7F
09/18 21:31, 7F
推
09/18 21:32, , 8F
09/18 21:32, 8F
→
09/18 21:33, , 9F
09/18 21:33, 9F
推
09/18 21:34, , 10F
09/18 21:34, 10F
→
09/18 21:36, , 11F
09/18 21:36, 11F
→
09/18 21:36, , 12F
09/18 21:36, 12F
推
09/18 21:39, , 13F
09/18 21:39, 13F
→
09/18 21:39, , 14F
09/18 21:39, 14F
→
09/18 21:39, , 15F
09/18 21:39, 15F
→
09/18 21:40, , 16F
09/18 21:40, 16F
→
09/18 21:42, , 17F
09/18 21:42, 17F
→
09/18 21:43, , 18F
09/18 21:43, 18F
→
09/18 21:43, , 19F
09/18 21:43, 19F
推
09/18 21:44, , 20F
09/18 21:44, 20F
→
09/18 21:45, , 21F
09/18 21:45, 21F
→
09/18 21:45, , 22F
09/18 21:45, 22F
→
09/18 21:45, , 23F
09/18 21:45, 23F
→
09/18 21:45, , 24F
09/18 21:45, 24F
→
09/18 21:46, , 25F
09/18 21:46, 25F
→
09/18 21:47, , 26F
09/18 21:47, 26F
推
09/18 21:50, , 27F
09/18 21:50, 27F
推
09/18 21:50, , 28F
09/18 21:50, 28F
→
09/18 21:50, , 29F
09/18 21:50, 29F
→
09/18 21:51, , 30F
09/18 21:51, 30F
→
09/18 21:52, , 31F
09/18 21:52, 31F
→
09/18 21:52, , 32F
09/18 21:52, 32F
→
09/18 21:52, , 33F
09/18 21:52, 33F
→
09/18 21:54, , 34F
09/18 21:54, 34F
→
09/18 21:54, , 35F
09/18 21:54, 35F
→
09/18 21:54, , 36F
09/18 21:54, 36F
→
09/18 21:54, , 37F
09/18 21:54, 37F
→
09/18 21:56, , 38F
09/18 21:56, 38F
→
09/18 21:56, , 39F
09/18 21:56, 39F
還有 134 則推文
→
09/19 06:46, , 174F
09/19 06:46, 174F
→
09/19 06:47, , 175F
09/19 06:47, 175F
推
09/19 06:58, , 176F
09/19 06:58, 176F
推
09/19 08:31, , 177F
09/19 08:31, 177F
→
09/19 08:31, , 178F
09/19 08:31, 178F
推
09/19 09:35, , 179F
09/19 09:35, 179F
推
09/19 09:39, , 180F
09/19 09:39, 180F
→
09/19 09:50, , 181F
09/19 09:50, 181F
推
09/19 10:06, , 182F
09/19 10:06, 182F
→
09/19 10:50, , 183F
09/19 10:50, 183F
→
09/19 11:45, , 184F
09/19 11:45, 184F
→
09/19 11:46, , 185F
09/19 11:46, 185F
推
09/19 13:07, , 186F
09/19 13:07, 186F
推
09/19 13:09, , 187F
09/19 13:09, 187F
推
09/19 14:11, , 188F
09/19 14:11, 188F
→
09/19 14:11, , 189F
09/19 14:11, 189F
推
09/19 14:20, , 190F
09/19 14:20, 190F
→
09/19 14:20, , 191F
09/19 14:20, 191F
→
09/19 14:21, , 192F
09/19 14:21, 192F
→
09/19 14:21, , 193F
09/19 14:21, 193F
推
09/19 14:41, , 194F
09/19 14:41, 194F
→
09/19 14:43, , 195F
09/19 14:43, 195F
推
09/19 14:50, , 196F
09/19 14:50, 196F
→
09/19 14:50, , 197F
09/19 14:50, 197F
→
09/19 14:53, , 198F
09/19 14:53, 198F
→
09/19 14:55, , 199F
09/19 14:55, 199F
推
09/19 15:00, , 200F
09/19 15:00, 200F
→
09/19 15:00, , 201F
09/19 15:00, 201F
→
09/19 20:45, , 202F
09/19 20:45, 202F
→
09/19 20:52, , 203F
09/19 20:52, 203F
推
09/19 21:40, , 204F
09/19 21:40, 204F
→
09/19 21:41, , 205F
09/19 21:41, 205F
→
09/19 21:41, , 206F
09/19 21:41, 206F
→
09/20 13:40, , 207F
09/20 13:40, 207F
→
09/20 13:40, , 208F
09/20 13:40, 208F
→
09/20 13:40, , 209F
09/20 13:40, 209F
→
09/20 13:40, , 210F
09/20 13:40, 210F
→
09/20 13:40, , 211F
09/20 13:40, 211F
→
09/20 20:41, , 212F
09/20 20:41, 212F
→
09/20 20:41, , 213F
09/20 20:41, 213F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文:
討論
14
48
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 7 篇):
討論
57
213
討論
4
14
討論
5
33
討論
14
48
討論
14
34
討論
6
13
討論
0
12