Re: [討論] 314反核的遊行可以認購綠電嗎?消失
※ 引述《summerlong (green)》之銘言:
: 截至103年12月25日止,綠電認購度數為434萬5400度,認購戶數總計533戶。
: 其中,個人戶數僅為319戶,最大認購量為1萬5000度,企業用戶為214戶,最大認購用戶
: 為日月光集團,認購量總計310萬度。
: 既然都去參加飯盒的遊行,不如現場順便申請認購綠電
: 化口號為實際,大家認為呢?
請問一下台電當初蓋核能電廠時有問過用戶要不要繳後端處理費嗎?
顯然沒有,而是強制徵收,只要你接台電的電網就要收這筆錢
就算反核的人不想繳這筆錢也不行
那為甚麼遇到再生能源就突然變得很「體貼」用戶
好聲好氣的問用戶要不要買綠電支持環保
根本就是不想推動嘛,不然就按照核電後端處理費用的模式一律都收不是嗎?
天主教會不賣贖罪券很久了,請台電不要搞那種幾百年前的老套好嗎?
日月光要不是偷排汙水被抓到,哪有可能買這種贖罪券
310萬度綠電就算一度10元,也不過3100萬
跟他汙染造成的傷害比起來恐怕是九牛一毛
台電還幫他宣傳,跟大愛電視台放送魏成美堂的新聞有什麼兩樣?
--
我做黑心油,我捐慈濟
我亂排汙水,我買綠電
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 118.163.118.235
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/PublicIssue/M.1425957634.A.092.html
噓
03/10 11:27, , 1F
03/10 11:27, 1F
等你散盡家財捐輸台電處理核廢料再來嗆聲可以嗎?
有沒有擁核人士要求反核者買綠電同時幫他分擔核電成本還敢大聲嗆人的八卦?
※ 編輯: kanako (118.163.118.235), 03/10/2015 11:33:26
噓
03/10 11:36, , 2F
03/10 11:36, 2F
只會要別人花錢解決問題,自己不肯花錢的擁核份子(蓋章)
況且就算我買了綠電,台電也不會因此減少或關閉核能電廠
那豈不是送肉飼虎,火上加油,達不到我的目的
※ 編輯: kanako (118.163.118.235), 03/10/2015 11:43:34
噓
03/10 11:40, , 3F
03/10 11:40, 3F
→
03/10 11:41, , 4F
03/10 11:41, 4F
噓
03/10 11:43, , 5F
03/10 11:43, 5F
→
03/10 11:43, , 6F
03/10 11:43, 6F
→
03/10 11:44, , 7F
03/10 11:44, 7F
→
03/10 11:47, , 8F
03/10 11:47, 8F
→
03/10 11:47, , 9F
03/10 11:47, 9F
這麼棒的東西台電應該是直接向所有用戶收綠電附加費才對
弄成讓人對嗆的贖罪券做什麼?
推
03/10 11:49, , 10F
03/10 11:49, 10F
※ 編輯: kanako (118.163.118.235), 03/10/2015 11:52:46
→
03/10 11:51, , 11F
03/10 11:51, 11F
噓
03/10 11:52, , 12F
03/10 11:52, 12F
→
03/10 11:52, , 13F
03/10 11:52, 13F
→
03/10 11:52, , 14F
03/10 11:52, 14F
→
03/10 11:52, , 15F
03/10 11:52, 15F
→
03/10 11:52, , 16F
03/10 11:52, 16F
→
03/10 11:53, , 17F
03/10 11:53, 17F
→
03/10 11:55, , 18F
03/10 11:55, 18F
噓
03/10 11:56, , 19F
03/10 11:56, 19F
→
03/10 11:56, , 20F
03/10 11:56, 20F
→
03/10 11:56, , 21F
03/10 11:56, 21F
→
03/10 11:56, , 22F
03/10 11:56, 22F
很好啊,比照核電後端處理費,每度都收0.17的綠電附加費不就好了?
想推的核電就強制收,不想推的綠電就來募捐點光明燈,真是精美的台電
※ 編輯: kanako (118.163.118.235), 03/10/2015 11:58:49
→
03/10 11:56, , 23F
03/10 11:56, 23F
→
03/10 11:57, , 24F
03/10 11:57, 24F
→
03/10 11:58, , 25F
03/10 11:58, 25F
→
03/10 11:58, , 26F
03/10 11:58, 26F
→
03/10 11:59, , 27F
03/10 11:59, 27F

→
03/10 11:59, , 28F
03/10 11:59, 28F

→
03/10 12:00, , 29F
03/10 12:00, 29F
噓
03/10 12:00, , 30F
03/10 12:00, 30F
噓
03/10 12:02, , 31F
03/10 12:02, 31F
→
03/10 12:02, , 32F
03/10 12:02, 32F
→
03/10 12:02, , 33F
03/10 12:02, 33F
→
03/10 12:03, , 34F
03/10 12:03, 34F
還有 37 則推文
還有 3 段內文
噓
03/10 13:10, , 72F
03/10 13:10, 72F
→
03/10 13:11, , 73F
03/10 13:11, 73F
噓
03/10 13:12, , 74F
03/10 13:12, 74F
→
03/10 13:13, , 75F
03/10 13:13, 75F
→
03/10 13:15, , 76F
03/10 13:15, 76F
噓
03/10 13:15, , 77F
03/10 13:15, 77F
推
03/10 13:17, , 78F
03/10 13:17, 78F
推
03/10 13:21, , 79F
03/10 13:21, 79F
→
03/10 13:22, , 80F
03/10 13:22, 80F

→
03/10 13:22, , 81F
03/10 13:22, 81F
推
03/10 14:20, , 82F
03/10 14:20, 82F
推
03/10 14:26, , 83F
03/10 14:26, 83F
噓
03/10 15:08, , 84F
03/10 15:08, 84F
→
03/10 15:09, , 85F
03/10 15:09, 85F
綠電只是手段,廢核才是反核人士的目的
請問台電承諾過綠電銷售額或銷售量到多少他就立刻廢核嗎?
如果沒有那怎麼能怪反核人士不買單呢?
※ 編輯: kanako (118.163.118.235), 03/10/2015 15:18:35
噓
03/10 15:53, , 86F
03/10 15:53, 86F
→
03/10 16:26, , 87F
03/10 16:26, 87F
→
03/10 16:28, , 88F
03/10 16:28, 88F
→
03/10 16:42, , 89F
03/10 16:42, 89F
推
03/10 16:43, , 90F
03/10 16:43, 90F
推
03/10 17:14, , 91F
03/10 17:14, 91F
噓
03/10 17:21, , 92F
03/10 17:21, 92F
→
03/10 17:22, , 93F
03/10 17:22, 93F
推
03/10 17:22, , 94F
03/10 17:22, 94F
→
03/10 17:23, , 95F
03/10 17:23, 95F
噓
03/10 17:24, , 96F
03/10 17:24, 96F
→
03/10 17:25, , 97F
03/10 17:25, 97F
→
03/10 17:51, , 98F
03/10 17:51, 98F
→
03/10 17:51, , 99F
03/10 17:51, 99F
推
03/10 17:52, , 100F
03/10 17:52, 100F
→
03/10 18:00, , 101F
03/10 18:00, 101F
→
03/10 18:00, , 102F
03/10 18:00, 102F
推
03/10 18:29, , 103F
03/10 18:29, 103F
推
03/10 18:32, , 104F
03/10 18:32, 104F
→
03/10 18:33, , 105F
03/10 18:33, 105F
噓
03/10 18:56, , 106F
03/10 18:56, 106F
推
03/10 20:48, , 107F
03/10 20:48, 107F
→
03/10 20:52, , 108F
03/10 20:52, 108F
推
03/10 21:50, , 109F
03/10 21:50, 109F
噓
03/11 18:03, , 110F
03/11 18:03, 110F
討論串 (同標題文章)