[討論] 關於小號與飛人
理性,勿戰(起手式)
當初為甚麼禁飛人想必不用多說,
今天怎麼換個差不多的行為叫小號,
大家就轉彎?
套句開司的話:
「今天板上人氣夠少了,再禁止討論『飛人』都沒人發言啦!」
「不需要管吧,反正也不會因為禁止討論板友就不開『飛人』。」
「連『飛人』玩法也禁止,有點走火入魔。」
上面三句話會不會聽起來怪怪der?
我身邊就有個例子:
家鄉這邊有個道館路線,
http://i.imgur.com/pRaAPd3.jpg
基本上這圖上面最遠的騎車不到十分鐘。
那時候有個三人組會騎車一路打過來,遇到敵隊打掉放本尊,
遇到同隊用小號打掉,再用本尊打。
如此一來每天必定能領100。
假如你是同隊在他前後要打道館都會很衰,
你在他前面你可能只能領10元,你在他後面抱歉請等1小時後道館洗牌。
我不覺得這件事是正常的,豈不是每個人都要練小號才能領20元以上?
今天板上開放討論只會讓更多人知道這種投機取巧的方式,
我不認為對遊戲風氣有所幫助。
謝謝大家
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 1.160.130.142
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/PokemonGO/M.1486805572.A.D16.html
推
02/11 17:36, , 1F
02/11 17:36, 1F
事實上一堆人知道XDD 要不要做而已 也讓大家知道這件事有多荒謬
噓
02/11 17:39, , 2F
02/11 17:39, 2F
不是嗎? 抱歉我只有一個帳號 一個禮拜現在領10元就不錯了
推
02/11 17:41, , 3F
02/11 17:41, 3F
→
02/11 17:41, , 4F
02/11 17:41, 4F
→
02/11 17:42, , 5F
02/11 17:42, 5F
但實際上他們都是在阻止你領20元以上,他們卻每天爽爽領100
→
02/11 17:42, , 6F
02/11 17:42, 6F
推
02/11 17:42, , 7F
02/11 17:42, 7F
→
02/11 17:43, , 8F
02/11 17:43, 8F
真的 碰到這種我不相信誰會開心
推
02/11 17:44, , 9F
02/11 17:44, 9F
推
02/11 17:44, , 10F
02/11 17:44, 10F
※ 編輯: satan04 (1.160.130.142), 02/11/2017 17:46:50
→
02/11 17:44, , 11F
02/11 17:44, 11F
→
02/11 17:45, , 12F
02/11 17:45, 12F
→
02/11 17:46, , 13F
02/11 17:46, 13F
→
02/11 17:46, , 14F
02/11 17:46, 14F
→
02/11 17:47, , 15F
02/11 17:47, 15F
推
02/11 17:48, , 16F
02/11 17:48, 16F
雙機雙帳也只是少了切帳號步驟 然後鑽官方漏洞而已
推
02/11 17:48, , 17F
02/11 17:48, 17F
推
02/11 17:48, , 18F
02/11 17:48, 18F
推
02/11 17:50, , 19F
02/11 17:50, 19F
推
02/11 17:51, , 20F
02/11 17:51, 20F
推
02/11 17:56, , 21F
02/11 17:56, 21F
→
02/11 17:56, , 22F
02/11 17:56, 22F
→
02/11 17:56, , 23F
02/11 17:56, 23F
→
02/11 17:56, , 24F
02/11 17:56, 24F
→
02/11 17:56, , 25F
02/11 17:56, 25F
遇到就真的很賭爛 明明他是能訓練放上去的 卻只想投機用小號打
推
02/11 17:58, , 26F
02/11 17:58, 26F
→
02/11 17:59, , 27F
02/11 17:59, 27F
※ 編輯: satan04 (1.160.130.142), 02/11/2017 18:01:43
推
02/11 18:08, , 28F
02/11 18:08, 28F
→
02/11 18:08, , 29F
02/11 18:08, 29F
推
02/11 18:09, , 30F
02/11 18:09, 30F
→
02/11 18:10, , 31F
02/11 18:10, 31F
還有 267 則推文
還有 10 段內文
→
02/12 11:25, , 299F
02/12 11:25, 299F
→
02/12 11:25, , 300F
02/12 11:25, 300F
→
02/12 11:26, , 301F
02/12 11:26, 301F
→
02/12 11:26, , 302F
02/12 11:26, 302F
→
02/12 11:26, , 303F
02/12 11:26, 303F
→
02/12 11:26, , 304F
02/12 11:26, 304F
→
02/12 11:26, , 305F
02/12 11:26, 305F
→
02/12 11:26, , 306F
02/12 11:26, 306F
→
02/12 11:26, , 307F
02/12 11:26, 307F
→
02/12 11:27, , 308F
02/12 11:27, 308F
→
02/12 11:27, , 309F
02/12 11:27, 309F
→
02/12 11:27, , 310F
02/12 11:27, 310F
→
02/12 11:28, , 311F
02/12 11:28, 311F
→
02/12 11:31, , 312F
02/12 11:31, 312F
→
02/12 11:32, , 313F
02/12 11:32, 313F
→
02/12 11:34, , 314F
02/12 11:34, 314F
→
02/12 11:35, , 315F
02/12 11:35, 315F
→
02/12 11:36, , 316F
02/12 11:36, 316F
推
02/12 12:46, , 317F
02/12 12:46, 317F
→
02/12 12:47, , 318F
02/12 12:47, 318F
→
02/12 12:48, , 319F
02/12 12:48, 319F
→
02/12 15:14, , 320F
02/12 15:14, 320F
→
02/12 15:14, , 321F
02/12 15:14, 321F
→
02/12 15:14, , 322F
02/12 15:14, 322F
→
02/12 15:14, , 323F
02/12 15:14, 323F
推
02/13 14:11, , 324F
02/13 14:11, 324F
→
02/13 14:12, , 325F
02/13 14:12, 325F
→
02/13 14:12, , 326F
02/13 14:12, 326F
→
02/13 14:13, , 327F
02/13 14:13, 327F
推
02/13 14:40, , 328F
02/13 14:40, 328F
→
02/13 14:41, , 329F
02/13 14:41, 329F
→
02/13 14:42, , 330F
02/13 14:42, 330F
噓
02/15 10:02, , 331F
02/15 10:02, 331F
推
02/15 17:33, , 332F
02/15 17:33, 332F
→
02/15 17:34, , 333F
02/15 17:34, 333F
→
02/15 17:36, , 334F
02/15 17:36, 334F
推
02/15 17:39, , 335F
02/15 17:39, 335F
推
02/15 17:43, , 336F
02/15 17:43, 336F
噓
02/24 06:53, , 337F
02/24 06:53, 337F
→
09/22 21:14, , 338F
09/22 21:14, 338F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文 (最舊先):
討論
5
109
討論
31
317
討論
4
11
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 15 篇):
討論
5
109
討論
36
206
討論
20
59
討論
31
317
討論
15
37
討論
41
390
討論
7
19
討論
4
11
討論
8
33