Re: [請益] 為什麼電源一定要上650W
看板PC_Shopping作者acctouhou (acctouhou)時間7年前 (2016/11/19 17:24)推噓27(27推 0噓 69→)留言96則, 25人參與討論串3/3 (看更多)
※ 引述《daumda (行不行)》之銘言:
: 大家好
: 常常看到版上拋兒瓦數的爭論,小弟發表一下淺見
: 有時候不是瓦數夠不夠的問題,而是接頭夠不夠用
: 比如說我要接8、9個sata電源,400w的拋哪有那麼多?
: 或是我要插雙卡,即使500、550w夠,大概也沒有雙八
: 另外就是功能以外的需求,信仰保固外觀...等等
: 所以我覺得有時候大家的反應可能太大了
: 看到自己不愛的就見獵心喜,互酸互嗆(比如1060vs480的爭論)
: 自己的愛人自己挑,電腦也是吧
: 希望優質電蝦(與其他版比起來XDD)還保有互相尊重的空間
: 謝謝大家
http://i.imgur.com/hShba3w.jpg
峰值真的有吃到300w啊
而且我蠻好奇一點,壓力測試耗電不應該更大,怎麼好像遊戲實際吃更多
是說廠商美化燒機成績,還是直接過熱降頻
這不只一家有發生,幾乎很多家測出來都差不多
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 140.113.69.232
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/PC_Shopping/M.1479547451.A.11A.html
※ 編輯: acctouhou (140.113.69.232), 11/19/2016 17:26:31
推
11/19 17:28, , 1F
11/19 17:28, 1F
是說鴿子封包有什麼卦,小的不清楚耶
推
11/19 17:29, , 2F
11/19 17:29, 2F
推
11/19 17:29, , 3F
11/19 17:29, 3F
像anandtech 有做遊戲的測試 rx480燒機比1060還省電喔 遊戲就反過來
推
11/19 17:30, , 4F
11/19 17:30, 4F
我同學的kernel power就爆掉惹
推
11/19 17:31, , 5F
11/19 17:31, 5F
※ 編輯: acctouhou (140.113.69.232), 11/19/2016 17:35:18
※ 編輯: acctouhou (140.113.69.232), 11/19/2016 17:36:39
推
11/19 17:48, , 6F
11/19 17:48, 6F
→
11/19 17:49, , 7F
11/19 17:49, 7F
推
11/19 17:52, , 8F
11/19 17:52, 8F
→
11/19 17:52, , 9F
11/19 17:52, 9F
→
11/19 17:52, , 10F
11/19 17:52, 10F
→
11/19 17:52, , 11F
11/19 17:52, 11F
→
11/19 17:52, , 12F
11/19 17:52, 12F
推
11/19 17:52, , 13F
11/19 17:52, 13F
→
11/19 17:55, , 14F
11/19 17:55, 14F
推
11/19 17:56, , 15F
11/19 17:56, 15F
→
11/19 17:56, , 16F
11/19 17:56, 16F
推
11/19 17:57, , 17F
11/19 17:57, 17F
推
11/19 18:02, , 18F
11/19 18:02, 18F
→
11/19 18:02, , 19F
11/19 18:02, 19F
→
11/19 18:02, , 20F
11/19 18:02, 20F
→
11/19 18:02, , 21F
11/19 18:02, 21F
→
11/19 18:03, , 22F
11/19 18:03, 22F
推
11/19 18:03, , 23F
11/19 18:03, 23F
→
11/19 18:05, , 24F
11/19 18:05, 24F
非公那吃電更兇喔
推
11/19 18:07, , 25F
11/19 18:07, 25F
話說我真的不懂當初是說pcie有超抽主板的風險,所以才在意啊 現在只是論單純功耗大
而已 ,我是真的不知道amd是有給妳錢喔? 每次480被嘴都超抽來反串就對了? 在網路
世界真的很難找到理性的人欸
→
11/19 18:08, , 26F
11/19 18:08, 26F
→
11/19 18:08, , 27F
11/19 18:08, 27F
→
11/19 18:08, , 28F
11/19 18:08, 28F
→
11/19 18:10, , 29F
11/19 18:10, 29F
→
11/19 18:11, , 30F
11/19 18:11, 30F
※ 編輯: acctouhou (140.113.69.232), 11/19/2016 18:15:10
※ 編輯: acctouhou (140.113.69.232), 11/19/2016 18:17:41
推
11/19 18:21, , 31F
11/19 18:21, 31F
推
11/19 18:22, , 32F
11/19 18:22, 32F
還有 24 則推文
還有 5 段內文
→
11/19 19:30, , 57F
11/19 19:30, 57F
→
11/19 19:31, , 58F
11/19 19:31, 58F
→
11/19 19:32, , 59F
11/19 19:32, 59F
→
11/19 19:32, , 60F
11/19 19:32, 60F
→
11/19 19:34, , 61F
11/19 19:34, 61F
→
11/19 19:35, , 62F
11/19 19:35, 62F
推
11/19 19:38, , 63F
11/19 19:38, 63F
→
11/19 19:38, , 64F
11/19 19:38, 64F
→
11/19 19:38, , 65F
11/19 19:38, 65F
→
11/19 19:38, , 66F
11/19 19:38, 66F
→
11/19 19:38, , 67F
11/19 19:38, 67F
→
11/19 19:38, , 68F
11/19 19:38, 68F
→
11/19 19:38, , 69F
11/19 19:38, 69F
→
11/19 19:39, , 70F
11/19 19:39, 70F
→
11/19 19:39, , 71F
11/19 19:39, 71F
推
11/19 20:22, , 72F
11/19 20:22, 72F
→
11/19 21:11, , 73F
11/19 21:11, 73F
→
11/19 21:14, , 74F
11/19 21:14, 74F
→
11/19 22:57, , 75F
11/19 22:57, 75F
→
11/19 22:57, , 76F
11/19 22:57, 76F
→
11/19 22:58, , 77F
11/19 22:58, 77F
→
11/19 23:00, , 78F
11/19 23:00, 78F
→
11/19 23:00, , 79F
11/19 23:00, 79F
推
11/19 23:04, , 80F
11/19 23:04, 80F
→
11/19 23:04, , 81F
11/19 23:04, 81F
→
11/19 23:23, , 82F
11/19 23:23, 82F
→
11/19 23:24, , 83F
11/19 23:24, 83F
推
11/19 23:42, , 84F
11/19 23:42, 84F
→
11/19 23:55, , 85F
11/19 23:55, 85F
推
11/20 00:55, , 86F
11/20 00:55, 86F
推
11/20 01:33, , 87F
11/20 01:33, 87F
推
11/20 03:39, , 88F
11/20 03:39, 88F
→
11/20 03:39, , 89F
11/20 03:39, 89F
推
11/20 04:43, , 90F
11/20 04:43, 90F
→
11/20 10:24, , 91F
11/20 10:24, 91F
推
11/20 13:11, , 92F
11/20 13:11, 92F
→
11/20 14:06, , 93F
11/20 14:06, 93F
→
11/20 15:17, , 94F
11/20 15:17, 94F
→
11/21 22:18, , 95F
11/21 22:18, 95F
→
11/22 10:06, , 96F
11/22 10:06, 96F
討論串 (同標題文章)