Re: [外絮] Rodman:聯盟變太快,球員奪不了冠就會被
先聲明幾點,
1. 我並不認為當年 Rodman 搞怪求延長合約的做法是對的。
2. Rodman 在季後賽不幫 Robinson 防守 Olajuwon,這一點不服從
教練與 Popovich 所下的防守方針也是錯的。
但是不能把馬刺的輸球單純怪在這一點上,因為 Rodman 真的
去包夾了,會不會造成火箭隊那群瘋狂射手更加猖狂呢?
3. 1994-95 球季 Rodman 被球團整的很慘,出賽 49 場中只有 26 場先發,
這對當時的連三屆籃板王與曾經的兩屆 DPOY 來說根本是羞辱吧!
當然很多人會覺得 Rodman 罪有應得,因為不服從球團。
不過當時的 GM 與教練,應該也要認知到,這樣去整一個桀傲不馴的 Rodman,
還有辦法希望他在季後賽乖乖聽話嗎?XD
4. Popovich 是軍人出身,Robinson 也是軍人出身,希望 Rodman 服從球隊是
在正常不過的事。
Rodman 在 1993-94 球季不就乖乖聽話、認真出賽全力輔佐 Robinson 嗎?
當時有聽過他公開批評過 Robinson 嗎?
5. Popovich 當時雖然是球隊 GM,但是跨過 Bob Hill 過度插手球隊內部事務
是不是妥當也很難說。
當時 Popovich 在季後賽時還跑進休息室大吼 Rodman,叫他去防守 Olajuwon。
Popovich 的脾氣大家都知道,二十年前的 Popovich 肯定是更為火爆的。
6. 為什麼 Robinson 會被酸心理素質呢?
查一查 Robinson 在季賽對決 Olajuwon 的數據就知道 (1995 以前),
兩人成績並不是一面倒的,球隊勝負甚至是 Robinson 佔優。
Robinson 還拿過得分王與單場 71 分,得分能力並不輸 Olajuwon。
兩人都拿過 DPOY,也是公認防守一流。
可是一到季後賽怎麼全都變了樣呢?
1995 西區決賽
FG% Pts Reb Ast Stl Blk PER
Olajuwon 56.0 35.3 12.5 5.0 1.3 4.2 35.5
Robinson 44.9 23.8 11.3 2.7 1.5 2.2 22.2
1994-95 季賽成績
FG% Pts Reb Ast Stl Blk PER
Olajuwon 51.7 27.8 10.8 3.5 1.8 3.4 26.0
Robinson 53.0 27.6 10.8 2.9 1.7 3.2 29.1
除了心理素質以外,真的很難去解釋為什麼 Robinson 無法
跟 Olajuwon 在季後賽互爆。
媒體與球迷的觀點是:
Robinson 你在季賽成績不輸 Olajuwon,團隊勝利還佔優勢。
怎麼一到季後賽,Robinson 與馬刺團隊防守被 Olajuwon 打爆。
而 Robinson 卻無法打爆 Olajuwon 與火箭團隊防守。
這真的是個謎,所以只能用心理素質來解釋了。
: 推 huntai : Popo這段寫反了吧? 當初Popo也認為Rodman值得加薪 02/10 00:37
: → huntai : 3.5Mil, 但是Rodman卻在開季訓練營搞失蹤 02/10 00:37
: → huntai : 然後一系列的罰款, 禁賽, 脫序, 請假, 搞到Popo極度 02/10 00:38
: → huntai : 不爽.還放話 "我要是跟他談加薪我就是個白癡" 02/10 00:39
: → huntai : 員工要老闆加薪,公司守則就算你不再不屑至少也做做 02/10 00:40
: → huntai : 樣子吧. Rodman這樣自己一副老大的樣子, 再加上Popo 02/10 00:41
: → huntai : 這麼注重紀律的人, 你不是明著逼他趕走你嗎? 02/10 00:41
https://tinyurl.com/heukwdp
San Antonio Spurs general manager Bob Bass On benefits of trade (via LA
Times):
“Everybody thought we were a marshmallow team. In making this trade we feel
we have really improved in (rebounding). He said he just wanted to win and
would show us how to win. In Dennis Rodman, I think we have one of the most
unique players that has ever played basketball. He proved his value to
Detroit last year. They were 4-15 without Rodman and 36-26 with him, and
their defensive average was 98 points with Rodman and 112 points without him.
Those are astounding statistics.”
Spurs head coach John Lucas:
“Rodman is the type of player who will be good for me.”
-------------------------------
交易來 Rodman 的 GM 與當時的教練都把 Rodman 當寶,Rodman 感覺到被重視,
1993-94 球季他當然是全力以赴回報 GM 與教練的善意。
過了一年換了新的 GM 與教練,怎知對待 Rodman 的態度如天壤之別呢?
這種情況下希望任何一位球員能夠保持表現,應該是一件很困難的事吧!
-------------------------------
http://articles.latimes.com/1995-05-10/sports/sp-64421_1_jack-haley/2
By the time this season started, the Spurs were under new management.
The new CEO, Robert McDermott, an insurance magnate, liked to be called
"General," his rank in the reserves. Lucas was encouraged to leave. McDermott
hired no-nonsense Gregg Popovich as general manager. Popovich brought in
straight-arrow Coach Bob Hill.
Rodman was no easy convert. In Detroit, he had lamented Chuck Daly's exit so
keenly, he wouldn't talk to his successor, Ron Rothstein.
Rodman had a promise from the prior administration to extend his contract,
adding a season at $6 million. The new people said he had to prove himself
first and act like everyone else too.
By way of reply, Rodman blew off the pre-camp dinner and arrived late for the
first exhibition. They put him on leave, then suspended him for the first
month of the season.
---------------------------------------
Rodman 在 1993-94 球季的表現還不夠讓新團隊為他延長合約,
新的 GM Popovich 告訴他,除了場上表現要證明自己以外,
你必須跟其他人一樣服從球隊指命。
等做到這些以後,再來談加薪。
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 61.224.75.80
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/NBA/M.1486692439.A.C85.html
推
02/10 10:10, , 1F
02/10 10:10, 1F
推
02/10 10:11, , 2F
02/10 10:11, 2F
推
02/10 10:11, , 3F
02/10 10:11, 3F
→
02/10 10:11, , 4F
02/10 10:11, 4F
噓
02/10 10:11, , 5F
02/10 10:11, 5F
→
02/10 10:12, , 6F
02/10 10:12, 6F
推
02/10 10:12, , 7F
02/10 10:12, 7F
→
02/10 10:12, , 8F
02/10 10:12, 8F
→
02/10 10:13, , 9F
02/10 10:13, 9F
→
02/10 10:14, , 10F
02/10 10:14, 10F
推
02/10 10:14, , 11F
02/10 10:14, 11F
→
02/10 10:14, , 12F
02/10 10:14, 12F
推
02/10 10:15, , 13F
02/10 10:15, 13F
→
02/10 10:16, , 14F
02/10 10:16, 14F
推
02/10 10:16, , 15F
02/10 10:16, 15F
推
02/10 10:17, , 16F
02/10 10:17, 16F
推
02/10 10:17, , 17F
02/10 10:17, 17F
推
02/10 10:17, , 18F
02/10 10:17, 18F
→
02/10 10:18, , 19F
02/10 10:18, 19F
→
02/10 10:18, , 20F
02/10 10:18, 20F
→
02/10 10:18, , 21F
02/10 10:18, 21F
→
02/10 10:18, , 22F
02/10 10:18, 22F
→
02/10 10:18, , 23F
02/10 10:18, 23F
推
02/10 10:19, , 24F
02/10 10:19, 24F
→
02/10 10:19, , 25F
02/10 10:19, 25F
推
02/10 10:20, , 26F
02/10 10:20, 26F
→
02/10 10:20, , 27F
02/10 10:20, 27F
→
02/10 10:21, , 28F
02/10 10:21, 28F
→
02/10 10:21, , 29F
02/10 10:21, 29F
推
02/10 10:22, , 30F
02/10 10:22, 30F
推
02/10 10:22, , 31F
02/10 10:22, 31F
推
02/10 10:22, , 32F
02/10 10:22, 32F
→
02/10 10:22, , 33F
02/10 10:22, 33F
→
02/10 10:22, , 34F
02/10 10:22, 34F
推
02/10 10:23, , 35F
02/10 10:23, 35F
→
02/10 10:24, , 36F
02/10 10:24, 36F
→
02/10 10:24, , 37F
02/10 10:24, 37F
→
02/10 10:26, , 38F
02/10 10:26, 38F
→
02/10 10:27, , 39F
02/10 10:27, 39F
還有 171 則推文
→
02/10 11:55, , 211F
02/10 11:55, 211F
推
02/10 11:56, , 212F
02/10 11:56, 212F
→
02/10 11:56, , 213F
02/10 11:56, 213F
→
02/10 11:56, , 214F
02/10 11:56, 214F
推
02/10 11:59, , 215F
02/10 11:59, 215F
推
02/10 12:02, , 216F
02/10 12:02, 216F
→
02/10 12:03, , 217F
02/10 12:03, 217F
推
02/10 12:09, , 218F
02/10 12:09, 218F
噓
02/10 12:12, , 219F
02/10 12:12, 219F
→
02/10 12:13, , 220F
02/10 12:13, 220F
推
02/10 12:18, , 221F
02/10 12:18, 221F
推
02/10 12:18, , 222F
02/10 12:18, 222F
→
02/10 12:19, , 223F
02/10 12:19, 223F
→
02/10 12:19, , 224F
02/10 12:19, 224F
→
02/10 12:22, , 225F
02/10 12:22, 225F
推
02/10 12:29, , 226F
02/10 12:29, 226F
推
02/10 12:34, , 227F
02/10 12:34, 227F
→
02/10 12:35, , 228F
02/10 12:35, 228F
推
02/10 12:46, , 229F
02/10 12:46, 229F
→
02/10 12:46, , 230F
02/10 12:46, 230F
→
02/10 12:47, , 231F
02/10 12:47, 231F
→
02/10 12:47, , 232F
02/10 12:47, 232F
推
02/10 12:49, , 233F
02/10 12:49, 233F
→
02/10 12:50, , 234F
02/10 12:50, 234F
→
02/10 12:50, , 235F
02/10 12:50, 235F
→
02/10 12:51, , 236F
02/10 12:51, 236F
→
02/10 12:52, , 237F
02/10 12:52, 237F
→
02/10 12:53, , 238F
02/10 12:53, 238F
→
02/10 12:53, , 239F
02/10 12:53, 239F
→
02/10 12:56, , 240F
02/10 12:56, 240F
→
02/10 12:58, , 241F
02/10 12:58, 241F
推
02/10 12:59, , 242F
02/10 12:59, 242F
推
02/10 13:05, , 243F
02/10 13:05, 243F
→
02/10 13:49, , 244F
02/10 13:49, 244F
推
02/10 14:18, , 245F
02/10 14:18, 245F
→
02/10 14:18, , 246F
02/10 14:18, 246F
→
02/10 14:18, , 247F
02/10 14:18, 247F
→
02/10 14:18, , 248F
02/10 14:18, 248F
推
02/10 17:01, , 249F
02/10 17:01, 249F
→
02/10 17:02, , 250F
02/10 17:02, 250F
討論串 (同標題文章)