Re: [討論] 這季對火箭隊其實是個失敗的球季已回收
以超低的球隊薪資來講根本是成功到不行啊,季後賽的門票應該是穩穩入手了
原本大家以為簽了些人是要來養成的,沒想到哈老大一來就晉身為勁旅,
看看薪資兩倍的現在進季後賽都還有疑慮,就可以知道教練的功力也是相當重要
球員年輕有他們的優勢在,要怎麼把這些好料炒出成一盤好菜就是教練的價值,
剛剛不小心看到外國火箭迷的評語,真的是相當台肯,分享給大家看看
http://bbs.clutchfans.net/showthread.php?t=233519
我認為火箭的進攻體系是NBA之中頂尖的
在我這些年來所看過的所有火箭比賽中,從三巨頭以來我還沒看過像今年這麼棒的一個
進攻系統,自從那時候開始總是有人說球員不適合這個體系,或是我們需要更好的球員,
但我們現在的進攻模式簡直太適合我們的球員陣容了,更令人驚訝的是哈老大甚至沒有
跟我們一起打季前賽。
我的意思是,我們加快節奏,因為我們在年齡和體能上有優勢,我們也有許多能控球
並發動快攻的球員,這掩飾了我們油漆區區進攻的不足,我們清出空間讓Harden
Lin 和 Parsons可以切入禁區,餵球給大個子讓他們保持動力(無論是禁區的Asik/Smith或
是三分線的PPT和Morris),每個球員都能發揮到他們的專長,這當然也包括Jeremy,他有
足夠的自由去做決定,也傳了很多快攻球
有些人可以一輩子去質疑McHale教練的上場時間分配和換人時間點,但你不能否認
我們的教練團創造了一個讓我們球員可以迎向勝利的系統。
偉哉 McHale
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 118.166.244.244
推
02/09 19:52, , 1F
02/09 19:52, 1F
推
02/09 19:54, , 2F
02/09 19:54, 2F
→
02/09 19:54, , 3F
02/09 19:54, 3F
→
02/09 19:54, , 4F
02/09 19:54, 4F
推
02/09 19:55, , 5F
02/09 19:55, 5F
→
02/09 19:55, , 6F
02/09 19:55, 6F
推
02/09 19:56, , 7F
02/09 19:56, 7F
→
02/09 19:56, , 8F
02/09 19:56, 8F
推
02/09 19:58, , 9F
02/09 19:58, 9F
推
02/09 20:07, , 10F
02/09 20:07, 10F
推
02/09 20:08, , 11F
02/09 20:08, 11F
→
02/09 20:08, , 12F
02/09 20:08, 12F
→
02/09 20:09, , 13F
02/09 20:09, 13F
推
02/09 20:09, , 14F
02/09 20:09, 14F
→
02/09 20:09, , 15F
02/09 20:09, 15F
→
02/09 20:10, , 16F
02/09 20:10, 16F
噓
02/09 20:10, , 17F
02/09 20:10, 17F
→
02/09 20:12, , 18F
02/09 20:12, 18F
→
02/09 20:13, , 19F
02/09 20:13, 19F
推
02/09 20:13, , 20F
02/09 20:13, 20F
推
02/09 20:14, , 21F
02/09 20:14, 21F
→
02/09 20:15, , 22F
02/09 20:15, 22F
推
02/09 20:20, , 23F
02/09 20:20, 23F
→
02/09 20:20, , 24F
02/09 20:20, 24F
→
02/09 20:21, , 25F
02/09 20:21, 25F
→
02/09 20:22, , 26F
02/09 20:22, 26F
→
02/09 20:23, , 27F
02/09 20:23, 27F
推
02/09 20:23, , 28F
02/09 20:23, 28F
推
02/09 20:24, , 29F
02/09 20:24, 29F
→
02/09 20:24, , 30F
02/09 20:24, 30F
推
02/09 20:26, , 31F
02/09 20:26, 31F
推
02/09 20:27, , 32F
02/09 20:27, 32F
→
02/09 20:27, , 33F
02/09 20:27, 33F
→
02/09 20:28, , 34F
02/09 20:28, 34F
噓
02/09 20:28, , 35F
02/09 20:28, 35F
→
02/09 20:29, , 36F
02/09 20:29, 36F
→
02/09 20:30, , 37F
02/09 20:30, 37F
→
02/09 20:31, , 38F
02/09 20:31, 38F
→
02/09 20:34, , 39F
02/09 20:34, 39F
還有 45 則推文
→
02/09 21:19, , 85F
02/09 21:19, 85F
→
02/09 21:19, , 86F
02/09 21:19, 86F
→
02/09 21:20, , 87F
02/09 21:20, 87F
→
02/09 21:22, , 88F
02/09 21:22, 88F
推
02/09 21:23, , 89F
02/09 21:23, 89F
→
02/09 21:23, , 90F
02/09 21:23, 90F
推
02/09 21:23, , 91F
02/09 21:23, 91F
→
02/09 21:24, , 92F
02/09 21:24, 92F
→
02/09 21:25, , 93F
02/09 21:25, 93F
→
02/09 21:27, , 94F
02/09 21:27, 94F
→
02/09 21:28, , 95F
02/09 21:28, 95F
推
02/09 21:28, , 96F
02/09 21:28, 96F
推
02/09 21:29, , 97F
02/09 21:29, 97F
→
02/09 21:29, , 98F
02/09 21:29, 98F
噓
02/09 21:33, , 99F
02/09 21:33, 99F
推
02/09 21:55, , 100F
02/09 21:55, 100F
→
02/09 21:56, , 101F
02/09 21:56, 101F
→
02/09 21:58, , 102F
02/09 21:58, 102F
推
02/09 22:00, , 103F
02/09 22:00, 103F
推
02/09 22:09, , 104F
02/09 22:09, 104F
→
02/09 22:09, , 105F
02/09 22:09, 105F
推
02/09 22:11, , 106F
02/09 22:11, 106F
推
02/09 22:23, , 107F
02/09 22:23, 107F
→
02/09 22:24, , 108F
02/09 22:24, 108F
推
02/09 22:25, , 109F
02/09 22:25, 109F
推
02/09 22:43, , 110F
02/09 22:43, 110F
推
02/09 22:47, , 111F
02/09 22:47, 111F
推
02/09 23:15, , 112F
02/09 23:15, 112F
→
02/09 23:16, , 113F
02/09 23:16, 113F
推
02/09 23:29, , 114F
02/09 23:29, 114F
推
02/09 23:32, , 115F
02/09 23:32, 115F
噓
02/09 23:50, , 116F
02/09 23:50, 116F
推
02/09 23:53, , 117F
02/09 23:53, 117F
→
02/09 23:54, , 118F
02/09 23:54, 118F
→
02/09 23:54, , 119F
02/09 23:54, 119F
推
02/10 03:16, , 120F
02/10 03:16, 120F
→
02/10 03:16, , 121F
02/10 03:16, 121F
推
02/10 08:44, , 122F
02/10 08:44, 122F
→
02/10 11:16, , 123F
02/10 11:16, 123F
推
02/10 17:29, , 124F
02/10 17:29, 124F
討論串 (同標題文章)
完整討論串 (本文為第 5 之 9 篇):
討論
-72
166