Re: [閒聊] 其實用尿袋真的是很不環保的事消失
※ 引述《winall (winall)》之銘言:
: Apple 為了自己設計方便,首先推出不能換電池手機
: 但這個動作根本不環保,還排放大量炭
: 因為不能換電池,不可能不用尿袋
: 否則你可能面臨沒電可以用手機狀態
: 1. 你先將電充到尿袋,再將尿袋的電充到手機
: ===>總共充兩次才到你的手機
: (1) 耗時(花兩倍時間)
: (2) 耗電(二次轉換電都有損失,尿袋也不可能有100%的無損)
: (有70%的無損就偷笑了)
: (3) 排放很多炭,損壞地球
: 以上都相對於電池
: 2. 我不認為因為設計方便就可以這樣
: 可以換電池就不好設計?
: 3. 沒辦法享受即時100%的快感
: 4. 尿袋充電在很多場合不方便
先說我是挺可換電池的那派。我很喜歡運動。出去慢跑或是騎單車。騎單車最在意重量了怎麼可能還帶個行動電源增加自己的負擔。慢跑更不用說了身上口袋放電源跑起來很不舒服。如果用不可換電池的手機只會把自己搞得神經兮兮。例如完了電量只剩30或20趴。朋友突然找我去騎車還是跑步。開啟app記錄時間又噴了一堆電。跑完只剩15趴。順便再去吃個宵夜。看朋友手機沒電直接換電池繼續爽爽滑,你只能發呆。還是你會跟朋友說,對不起我手機快沒電了下次再約我騎車。蠢!
--
Sent from my Android
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 172.56.22.68
※ 文章網址: http://www.ptt.cc/bbs/MobileComm/M.1399153170.A.352.html
推
05/04 06:35, , 1F
05/04 06:35, 1F
→
05/04 06:35, , 2F
05/04 06:35, 2F
→
05/04 07:33, , 3F
05/04 07:33, 3F
推
05/04 07:46, , 4F
05/04 07:46, 4F
→
05/04 07:51, , 5F
05/04 07:51, 5F
→
05/04 07:51, , 6F
05/04 07:51, 6F
→
05/04 08:08, , 7F
05/04 08:08, 7F
推
05/04 08:19, , 8F
05/04 08:19, 8F
→
05/04 08:19, , 9F
05/04 08:19, 9F
推
05/04 08:20, , 10F
05/04 08:20, 10F
→
05/04 08:25, , 11F
05/04 08:25, 11F
→
05/04 08:25, , 12F
05/04 08:25, 12F
→
05/04 08:37, , 13F
05/04 08:37, 13F
→
05/04 08:38, , 14F
05/04 08:38, 14F
→
05/04 08:39, , 15F
05/04 08:39, 15F
→
05/04 08:41, , 16F
05/04 08:41, 16F
→
05/04 08:42, , 17F
05/04 08:42, 17F
推
05/04 08:42, , 18F
05/04 08:42, 18F
→
05/04 08:43, , 19F
05/04 08:43, 19F
推
05/04 08:43, , 20F
05/04 08:43, 20F
推
05/04 08:44, , 21F
05/04 08:44, 21F
推
05/04 08:58, , 22F
05/04 08:58, 22F
→
05/04 08:58, , 23F
05/04 08:58, 23F
→
05/04 08:58, , 24F
05/04 08:58, 24F
推
05/04 09:02, , 25F
05/04 09:02, 25F
→
05/04 09:02, , 26F
05/04 09:02, 26F
推
05/04 09:09, , 27F
05/04 09:09, 27F
→
05/04 09:09, , 28F
05/04 09:09, 28F
→
05/04 09:23, , 29F
05/04 09:23, 29F
→
05/04 09:32, , 30F
05/04 09:32, 30F
推
05/04 09:33, , 31F
05/04 09:33, 31F
→
05/04 09:37, , 32F
05/04 09:37, 32F
推
05/04 09:43, , 33F
05/04 09:43, 33F
推
05/04 09:49, , 34F
05/04 09:49, 34F
→
05/04 09:49, , 35F
05/04 09:49, 35F
→
05/04 09:50, , 36F
05/04 09:50, 36F
→
05/04 09:50, , 37F
05/04 09:50, 37F
→
05/04 09:57, , 38F
05/04 09:57, 38F
推
05/04 10:11, , 39F
05/04 10:11, 39F
→
05/04 10:11, , 40F
05/04 10:11, 40F
推
05/04 10:14, , 41F
05/04 10:14, 41F
→
05/04 10:14, , 42F
05/04 10:14, 42F
→
05/04 10:14, , 43F
05/04 10:14, 43F
→
05/04 10:14, , 44F
05/04 10:14, 44F
→
05/04 10:15, , 45F
05/04 10:15, 45F
→
05/04 10:17, , 46F
05/04 10:17, 46F
→
05/04 10:18, , 47F
05/04 10:18, 47F
→
05/04 10:23, , 48F
05/04 10:23, 48F
→
05/04 10:27, , 49F
05/04 10:27, 49F
→
05/04 10:28, , 50F
05/04 10:28, 50F
→
05/04 10:29, , 51F
05/04 10:29, 51F
推
05/04 10:31, , 52F
05/04 10:31, 52F
→
05/04 10:31, , 53F
05/04 10:31, 53F
推
05/04 10:40, , 54F
05/04 10:40, 54F
→
05/04 10:42, , 55F
05/04 10:42, 55F
→
05/04 11:01, , 56F
05/04 11:01, 56F
→
05/04 11:05, , 57F
05/04 11:05, 57F
→
05/04 11:06, , 58F
05/04 11:06, 58F
推
05/04 11:09, , 59F
05/04 11:09, 59F
→
05/04 11:10, , 60F
05/04 11:10, 60F
→
05/04 11:10, , 61F
05/04 11:10, 61F
→
05/04 11:10, , 62F
05/04 11:10, 62F
→
05/04 11:11, , 63F
05/04 11:11, 63F
推
05/04 11:24, , 64F
05/04 11:24, 64F
→
05/04 11:34, , 65F
05/04 11:34, 65F
→
05/04 11:58, , 66F
05/04 11:58, 66F
推
05/04 12:01, , 67F
05/04 12:01, 67F
→
05/04 12:01, , 68F
05/04 12:01, 68F
推
05/04 12:09, , 69F
05/04 12:09, 69F
推
05/04 13:06, , 70F
05/04 13:06, 70F
→
05/04 13:43, , 71F
05/04 13:43, 71F
→
05/04 13:43, , 72F
05/04 13:43, 72F
推
05/04 19:05, , 73F
05/04 19:05, 73F
→
05/04 19:05, , 74F
05/04 19:05, 74F
→
05/04 20:17, , 75F
05/04 20:17, 75F
→
05/04 20:17, , 76F
05/04 20:17, 76F
推
05/05 11:26, , 77F
05/05 11:26, 77F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文:
完整討論串 (本文為第 8 之 11 篇):