Re: [分享] 中和人未來轉乘
中永和有很多來台北打拼外地人居住在此
所以往台北車站的需求勢必不低
在沒分家前可以在古亭轉
順利轉到的機率是1/2,即淡水新店線
另一種則是到中正紀念堂再轉,也就是轉兩次
分家以後,因為淡水新店線的消失
中永和前往台北車站若在古亭轉,註定就是要轉兩次
當然,你說也可以在東門轉
但可別忘了古亭-東門這段是出奇的慢
更不用說去忠孝新生轉,更是繞遠路
所以在我看來
分家後對中永和居民前往台北車站是有很大的不便
要不忍受轉兩次的不便利性(古亭、中正紀念堂)
要不忍受較長的搭乘時間(到東門或忠孝新生轉)
對於因為要返鄉而趕高鐵或火車的人,實在並非好消息
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 111.249.38.158
※ 文章網址: http://www.ptt.cc/bbs/MRT/M.1397013006.A.72A.html
→
04/09 11:12, , 1F
04/09 11:12, 1F
推
04/09 11:12, , 2F
04/09 11:12, 2F
噓
04/09 11:14, , 3F
04/09 11:14, 3F
→
04/09 11:14, , 4F
04/09 11:14, 4F
→
04/09 11:15, , 5F
04/09 11:15, 5F
→
04/09 11:16, , 6F
04/09 11:16, 6F
→
04/09 11:16, , 7F
04/09 11:16, 7F
→
04/09 11:17, , 8F
04/09 11:17, 8F
→
04/09 11:18, , 9F
04/09 11:18, 9F
→
04/09 11:18, , 10F
04/09 11:18, 10F
→
04/09 11:19, , 11F
04/09 11:19, 11F
→
04/09 11:19, , 12F
04/09 11:19, 12F
推
04/09 11:21, , 13F
04/09 11:21, 13F
噓
04/09 11:22, , 14F
04/09 11:22, 14F
→
04/09 11:28, , 15F
04/09 11:28, 15F
→
04/09 11:28, , 16F
04/09 11:28, 16F
→
04/09 11:29, , 17F
04/09 11:29, 17F
→
04/09 11:29, , 18F
04/09 11:29, 18F
→
04/09 11:30, , 19F
04/09 11:30, 19F
→
04/09 11:31, , 20F
04/09 11:31, 20F
→
04/09 11:33, , 21F
04/09 11:33, 21F
噓
04/09 11:33, , 22F
04/09 11:33, 22F
→
04/09 11:33, , 23F
04/09 11:33, 23F
→
04/09 11:34, , 24F
04/09 11:34, 24F
→
04/09 11:38, , 25F
04/09 11:38, 25F
噓
04/09 11:45, , 26F
04/09 11:45, 26F
推
04/09 11:50, , 27F
04/09 11:50, 27F
→
04/09 11:51, , 28F
04/09 11:51, 28F
噓
04/09 12:00, , 29F
04/09 12:00, 29F
推
04/09 12:06, , 30F
04/09 12:06, 30F
→
04/09 12:08, , 31F
04/09 12:08, 31F
→
04/09 12:09, , 32F
04/09 12:09, 32F
→
04/09 12:14, , 33F
04/09 12:14, 33F
→
04/09 12:18, , 34F
04/09 12:18, 34F
→
04/09 12:19, , 35F
04/09 12:19, 35F
推
04/09 12:22, , 36F
04/09 12:22, 36F
→
04/09 12:22, , 37F
04/09 12:22, 37F
→
04/09 12:22, , 38F
04/09 12:22, 38F
噓
04/09 12:30, , 39F
04/09 12:30, 39F
還有 30 則推文
→
04/09 14:47, , 70F
04/09 14:47, 70F
噓
04/09 14:51, , 71F
04/09 14:51, 71F
→
04/09 14:53, , 72F
04/09 14:53, 72F
→
04/09 15:14, , 73F
04/09 15:14, 73F
→
04/09 15:15, , 74F
04/09 15:15, 74F
噓
04/09 16:25, , 75F
04/09 16:25, 75F
噓
04/09 16:27, , 76F
04/09 16:27, 76F
推
04/09 16:53, , 77F
04/09 16:53, 77F
→
04/09 16:53, , 78F
04/09 16:53, 78F
→
04/09 16:53, , 79F
04/09 16:53, 79F
噓
04/09 17:13, , 80F
04/09 17:13, 80F
→
04/09 17:46, , 81F
04/09 17:46, 81F
推
04/09 17:52, , 82F
04/09 17:52, 82F
→
04/09 17:57, , 83F
04/09 17:57, 83F
謝謝樓上的pory大,這的確是我想表達的
既然分流利大於弊的話,我並沒有反對分流
但問題在於,分流勢必一部分的人受益,一部分的人受負面影響
我只是單純把負面影響闡述出來,如此而已
我們總不能把所有負面影響都視而不見吧?
※ 編輯: nowill (36.224.192.71), 04/09/2014 18:02:56
推
04/09 18:09, , 84F
04/09 18:09, 84F
→
04/09 19:28, , 85F
04/09 19:28, 85F
→
04/09 19:29, , 86F
04/09 19:29, 86F
噓
04/09 19:34, , 87F
04/09 19:34, 87F
→
04/09 19:35, , 88F
04/09 19:35, 88F
→
04/09 19:36, , 89F
04/09 19:36, 89F
→
04/09 19:41, , 90F
04/09 19:41, 90F
→
04/09 19:41, , 91F
04/09 19:41, 91F
推
04/09 19:57, , 92F
04/09 19:57, 92F
→
04/09 19:58, , 93F
04/09 19:58, 93F
推
04/09 20:30, , 94F
04/09 20:30, 94F
推
04/09 20:32, , 95F
04/09 20:32, 95F
→
04/09 20:32, , 96F
04/09 20:32, 96F
推
04/09 20:34, , 97F
04/09 20:34, 97F
→
04/09 20:34, , 98F
04/09 20:34, 98F
推
04/09 21:23, , 99F
04/09 21:23, 99F
推
04/10 01:07, , 100F
04/10 01:07, 100F
→
04/10 01:39, , 101F
04/10 01:39, 101F
噓
04/10 10:55, , 102F
04/10 10:55, 102F
推
04/10 10:58, , 103F
04/10 10:58, 103F
→
04/10 10:58, , 104F
04/10 10:58, 104F
→
04/10 16:51, , 105F
04/10 16:51, 105F
→
04/10 16:52, , 106F
04/10 16:52, 106F
→
04/10 16:58, , 107F
04/10 16:58, 107F
→
04/10 16:58, , 108F
04/10 16:58, 108F
討論串 (同標題文章)