[問卦] 柯P落選的話40歲以下人們會崩潰嗎?消失
照這個辦勢看起來
台北市長選舉89不離10是丁丁會上了
四年前柯P贏下了台灣首都的選戰
以白色力量突破了非藍即綠
以政治素人之姿打敗了藍營貴公子勝文
上任後認真做事,各種直白施鹽,打臉不分藍綠的各種垃圾
40歲以下的人民支持率高達9成左右
偏偏資進黨硬要推人出來選
在藍營基本盤非常大又非常穩的台北市
柯P競選連任的勝負差可能就在那幾個百分點
(砍敬老金,又阻人財路,肯定很多人不投他)
資進黨的垃圾再怎麼爛,還是能吸引到同類型的選民票數
好了,資進黨明知自推穩輸墊底
卻還是要拖下柯P,讓狗民黨贏下台北
40歲以下民眾對於台灣政治改變的希望
本來從柯P開始執政了首都台北還抱有些許憧憬
如果這次的市長選舉,資進黨這招玉石俱焚成功了
藍綠這招"只准我們玩,其它人都壓入水"繼續玩台灣人
年輕一輩的選民們還會對台灣的政治抱有絲毫希望嗎?
還是會跟肥宅我一樣崩潰潰呢?
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 223.137.135.160
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/Gossiping/M.1526460789.A.DD3.html
→
05/16 16:53, , 1F
05/16 16:53, 1F
→
05/16 16:53, , 2F
05/16 16:53, 2F
推
05/16 16:53, , 3F
05/16 16:53, 3F
→
05/16 16:53, , 4F
05/16 16:53, 4F
→
05/16 16:53, , 5F
05/16 16:53, 5F
→
05/16 16:53, , 6F
05/16 16:53, 6F
推
05/16 16:53, , 7F
05/16 16:53, 7F
→
05/16 16:53, , 8F
05/16 16:53, 8F
→
05/16 16:54, , 9F
05/16 16:54, 9F
推
05/16 16:54, , 10F
05/16 16:54, 10F
→
05/16 16:54, , 11F
05/16 16:54, 11F
噓
05/16 16:54, , 12F
05/16 16:54, 12F
推
05/16 16:54, , 13F
05/16 16:54, 13F
→
05/16 16:54, , 14F
05/16 16:54, 14F
→
05/16 16:54, , 15F
05/16 16:54, 15F
→
05/16 16:54, , 16F
05/16 16:54, 16F
→
05/16 16:54, , 17F
05/16 16:54, 17F
推
05/16 16:54, , 18F
05/16 16:54, 18F
→
05/16 16:54, , 19F
05/16 16:54, 19F
噓
05/16 16:54, , 20F
05/16 16:54, 20F
推
05/16 16:54, , 21F
05/16 16:54, 21F
→
05/16 16:55, , 22F
05/16 16:55, 22F
→
05/16 16:55, , 23F
05/16 16:55, 23F
推
05/16 16:55, , 24F
05/16 16:55, 24F
推
05/16 16:55, , 25F
05/16 16:55, 25F
→
05/16 16:55, , 26F
05/16 16:55, 26F
→
05/16 16:55, , 27F
05/16 16:55, 27F
推
05/16 16:55, , 28F
05/16 16:55, 28F
推
05/16 16:55, , 29F
05/16 16:55, 29F
→
05/16 16:56, , 30F
05/16 16:56, 30F
推
05/16 16:56, , 31F
05/16 16:56, 31F
推
05/16 16:56, , 32F
05/16 16:56, 32F
→
05/16 16:56, , 33F
05/16 16:56, 33F
推
05/16 16:56, , 34F
05/16 16:56, 34F
噓
05/16 16:56, , 35F
05/16 16:56, 35F
推
05/16 16:56, , 36F
05/16 16:56, 36F
→
05/16 16:56, , 37F
05/16 16:56, 37F
推
05/16 16:56, , 38F
05/16 16:56, 38F
推
05/16 16:56, , 39F
05/16 16:56, 39F
還有 368 則推文
推
05/16 19:10, , 408F
05/16 19:10, 408F
推
05/16 19:10, , 409F
05/16 19:10, 409F
推
05/16 19:10, , 410F
05/16 19:10, 410F
噓
05/16 19:10, , 411F
05/16 19:10, 411F
→
05/16 19:11, , 412F
05/16 19:11, 412F
推
05/16 19:11, , 413F
05/16 19:11, 413F
→
05/16 19:12, , 414F
05/16 19:12, 414F
推
05/16 19:12, , 415F
05/16 19:12, 415F
推
05/16 19:13, , 416F
05/16 19:13, 416F
噓
05/16 19:13, , 417F
05/16 19:13, 417F
推
05/16 19:14, , 418F
05/16 19:14, 418F
推
05/16 19:15, , 419F
05/16 19:15, 419F
推
05/16 19:19, , 420F
05/16 19:19, 420F
推
05/16 19:19, , 421F
05/16 19:19, 421F
推
05/16 19:19, , 422F
05/16 19:19, 422F
推
05/16 19:20, , 423F
05/16 19:20, 423F
推
05/16 19:21, , 424F
05/16 19:21, 424F
推
05/16 19:21, , 425F
05/16 19:21, 425F
推
05/16 19:21, , 426F
05/16 19:21, 426F
推
05/16 19:21, , 427F
05/16 19:21, 427F
推
05/16 19:21, , 428F
05/16 19:21, 428F
→
05/16 19:21, , 429F
05/16 19:21, 429F
→
05/16 19:21, , 430F
05/16 19:21, 430F
→
05/16 19:22, , 431F
05/16 19:22, 431F
推
05/16 19:22, , 432F
05/16 19:22, 432F
推
05/16 19:22, , 433F
05/16 19:22, 433F
推
05/16 19:23, , 434F
05/16 19:23, 434F
推
05/16 19:24, , 435F
05/16 19:24, 435F
推
05/16 19:24, , 436F
05/16 19:24, 436F
推
05/16 19:24, , 437F
05/16 19:24, 437F
→
05/16 19:25, , 438F
05/16 19:25, 438F
推
05/16 19:26, , 439F
05/16 19:26, 439F
推
05/16 19:26, , 440F
05/16 19:26, 440F
推
05/16 19:27, , 441F
05/16 19:27, 441F
→
05/16 19:27, , 442F
05/16 19:27, 442F
→
05/16 19:27, , 443F
05/16 19:27, 443F
噓
05/16 19:28, , 444F
05/16 19:28, 444F
推
05/16 19:28, , 445F
05/16 19:28, 445F
推
05/16 19:28, , 446F
05/16 19:28, 446F
推
05/16 19:29, , 447F
05/16 19:29, 447F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文 (最舊先):
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 100 篇):